<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;chess&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Mostly Harmless Scams...</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18085511825/dailydirt-mostly-harmless-scams.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18085511825/dailydirt-mostly-harmless-scams.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There's cheating, and then there's cheating. There are obviously bad scams that hurt people or involve the loss of significant amounts of money or property, but some scams are hurtful on a much smaller scale. Here are just a few notable examples of some cheaters who were caught red-handed.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/8362701/the-evolution-cheating-chess" href="http://es.pn/WTNuy7">Now that computers are better than humans at playing chess, it shouldn't be too surprising that chess engines are being caught in use in human vs human tournaments.</a> One teenager was found using the Fritz chess engine during competition, and it could mean future chess tournaments will be held without any kind of technology near the competitors. [<a href="http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/8362701/the-evolution-cheating-chess">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="https://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/2013/01/14/case-study-pro-active-log-review-might-be-a-good-idea/" href="http://bit.ly/WRLutf">A mid-40s software developer was caught outsourcing his job to a team of programmers in China (for about a fifth of his annual salary).</a> And he would have gotten away with it, too, if he'd just covered his tracks a bit better. [<a href="https://securityblog.verizonbusiness.com/2013/01/14/case-study-pro-active-log-review-might-be-a-good-idea/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/05/how-the-professor-who-fooled-wikipedia-got-caught-by-reddit/257134/" href="http://bit.ly/UGjM4e">Prof T. Mills Kelly taught a class at George Mason University that encouraged undergraduates to enter fake information into Wikipedia.</a> Don't believe everything you read, kids... [<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/05/how-the-professor-who-fooled-wikipedia-got-caught-by-reddit/257134/">url</a>]</li>

</ul>


If you'd like to read more awesome and interesting stuff, check out this unrelated (but not entirely random!) <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt post</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18085511825/dailydirt-mostly-harmless-scams.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18085511825/dailydirt-mostly-harmless-scams.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101111/18085511825/dailydirt-mostly-harmless-scams.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101111/18085511825</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 May 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Fooling Some Of The People Some Of The Time...</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100420/1005249107/dailydirt-fooling-some-people-some-time.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100420/1005249107/dailydirt-fooling-some-people-some-time.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There's a sucker born every minute -- if you like to believe unverifiable statistics. Usually, if it's too good to be true, it ain't true. But as technology gets better, sometimes it's hard to distinguish sufficiently advanced algorithms from magic. Here are a few scams that successfully fooled some folks for a while.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303513404577355980891225456.html" href="http://on.wsj.com/II1lCu">A stock-picking robot named Marl convinced thousands of investors that it could identify penny stocks that were about to soar in price.</a> The SEC is looking to impose a fine and force the creators of Marl to repay their duped investors... but with claims on a website like: "The longer Marl is allowed to run on a computer &#8230; The More Advanced He Becomes!" How could anyone go wrong?  [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303513404577355980891225456.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/labscam.html" href="http://bit.ly/Iqbt0y">Penn and Teller don't usually do pranks, but when it comes to tricking Nobel prize laureate, Arno Penzias, they apparently make exceptions.</a> Creating a fake computer with voice recognition in the late 1980s fooled this brilliant physicist, but nowadays Apple's Siri is in TV ads all the time doing nearly the same routine. [<a href="http://cm.bell-labs.com/who/dmr/labscam.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1574" href="http://bit.ly/IvyNPo">Baron Wolfgang von Kempelen built a mechanical chess-playing machine (shaped like a Turk...) that gained widespread fame in 1769.</a> This mechanical turk was actually controlled by a hidden human being, but only a few hundred years later, we actually could build a chess playing robot with grandmaster skills. [<a href="http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=1574">url</a>]</li>


<li><b>To discover more interesting AI-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:29" href="http://bit.ly/h0iGmR">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:29">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100420/1005249107/dailydirt-fooling-some-people-some-time.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100420/1005249107/dailydirt-fooling-some-people-some-time.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100420/1005249107/dailydirt-fooling-some-people-some-time.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100420/1005249107</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Games Of (For?) Skill</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/02575314478/dailydirt-games-skill.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/02575314478/dailydirt-games-skill.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Plenty of video games are just a waste of time, but some games aim to be more than just ways to entertain kids and people with too much free time. A few games try to solve real world problems, and there are a handful of games that claim to improve mental agility. Here are some quick links on games and human cognition.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2011/12/01/how-a-computer-game-is-reinventing-the-science-of-expertise-video/" href="http://bit.ly/zjHgCR">Chess used to be the game that could measure a person's cognitive capabilities, but StarCraft2 might be the new game that provides metrics for humans' abilities to plot and strategize.</a> Meanwhile, the computers are wondering why we're wasting so much time on variations of Tic-Tac-Toe and Rock-Paper-Scissors. [<a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2011/12/01/how-a-computer-game-is-reinventing-the-science-of-expertise-video/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/primerist/code-hero-a-game-that-teaches-you-to-make-games-he" href="http://kck.st/w2UT8S">Imagine a game that taught you how to program better video games, would that be a fun game?</a> If only the result was actually a virtuous cycle for improving video games and programmers... [<a href="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/primerist/code-hero-a-game-that-teaches-you-to-make-games-he">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110916/full/news.2011.543.html?WT.ec_id=NEWS-20110920" href="http://bit.ly/zJr6dJ">Previous studies that suggested video games can help improve human cognitive function may be seriously flawed.</a> Experimental design is really critical for generating psychology conclusions that aren't biased -- and surprise, surprise: there are a lot of widely-cited studies that are poorly designed. [<a href="http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110916/full/news.2011.543.html?WT.ec_id=NEWS-20110920">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To find some cool online games, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:117" href="http://bit.ly/ifsJE4">check out what StumbleUpon has found to play.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:117">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/02575314478/dailydirt-games-skill.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/02575314478/dailydirt-games-skill.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/02575314478/dailydirt-games-skill.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110531/02575314478</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Help Me, Software, You're Our Only Hope...</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110603/11150914548/dailydirt-help-me-software-youre-our-only-hope.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110603/11150914548/dailydirt-help-me-software-youre-our-only-hope.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Everyone relies on software nowadays -- sometimes without even realizing it. But when an entire airline shuts down due to a computer outage, our dependence on technology becomes obvious. (And Skynet is simply reminding us who is really in charge.) Here are a few links on software projects that humans might want to keep an eye on.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.technologyreview.com/article/37206/" href="http://bit.ly/kEAR4o">Wouldn't it be nice if there was software that could make sure that other software was crash-proof?</a> Who cares who watches the watchers... [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/article/37206/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/05/16/976509/-The-No-Losers-Tax-Simplification-Proposal" href="http://bit.ly/kpz4Co">David Brin has suggested that computer algorithms could make US tax code much simpler.</a> However, Brin's proposal sounds like a software version of Utilitarianism -- with a way to exact taxes but without a calculus for fairness. [<a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/05/16/976509/-The-No-Losers-Tax-Simplification-Proposal">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/88610-rybka-the-worlds-best-chess-engine-outlawed-and-disqualified" href="http://bit.ly/lJMMEZ">The world's best chess software has been caught cheating (because its human author copied from open source chess programs).</a> Sorry, Rybka, the International Computer Games Association (ICGA) says you can't play anymore. [<a href="http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/88610-rybka-the-worlds-best-chess-engine-outlawed-and-disqualified">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting software-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:29" href="http://bit.ly/h0iGmR">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:29">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110603/11150914548/dailydirt-help-me-software-youre-our-only-hope.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110603/11150914548/dailydirt-help-me-software-youre-our-only-hope.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110603/11150914548/dailydirt-help-me-software-youre-our-only-hope.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110603/11150914548</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Add Jeopardy! To The List Of Games That AI Is Better At Than You....</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110216/13575213130/dailydirt-add-jeopardy-to-list-games-that-ai-is-better-than-you.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110216/13575213130/dailydirt-add-jeopardy-to-list-games-that-ai-is-better-than-you.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Today is the final game of Jeopardy! where the IBM supercomputer Watson plays against two of the best human players to ever compete on the show.  Folks on the East Coast already know the outcome by now, so feel free to ruin the suspense in the comments below for those of us in later time zones.  But whatever the outcome, Watson's performance has been pretty interesting to watch.  And let's hope these supercomputers don't start playing thermonuclear war any time soon. In the meantime, here are some links on AI beating humans at other games and tests.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_-_Kasparov,_1996,_Game_1" href="http://bit.ly/ggkwRQ">Deep Blue won its first game of chess against Garry Kasparov in 1996.</a>  The computer didn't win the match that year, but it won the re-match in 1997. [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_-_Kasparov,_1996,_Game_1">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~chinook/project/" href="http://bit.ly/hbMduC">Checkers was declared "solved" in 2007 by the Chinook project.</a>  Chinook was actually stronger than any human player by 1996, but it took a few more years for Chinook to realize checkers was a futile game (like tic-tac-toe) and retire. [<a href="http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~chinook/project/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaris_(poker_bot)" href="http://bit.ly/emhD9p">A few years ago, the Polaris poker bot beat a few professionals at Texas hold'em.</a>  So be careful playing poker online... [<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaris_(poker_bot)">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1YE2wQ/www.longbets.org/1" href="http://bit.ly/hKDwzD">The famous long bet between Mitchell Kapor and Ray Kurzweil has $20,000 riding on the question of whether or not AI will pass a Turing test by 2029.</a>  The bet started in 2002, and Kapor even suggested back then that a machine might win at a Jeopardy! game show. [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/1YE2wQ/www.longbets.org/1">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting stuff on artificial intelligence, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:29" href="http://bit.ly/h0iGmR">check out what the robots at StumbleUpon suggest.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:29">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110216/13575213130/dailydirt-add-jeopardy-to-list-games-that-ai-is-better-than-you.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110216/13575213130/dailydirt-add-jeopardy-to-list-games-that-ai-is-better-than-you.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110216/13575213130/dailydirt-add-jeopardy-to-list-games-that-ai-is-better-than-you.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110216/13575213130</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Jun 2010 09:00:13 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Bulgarian Chess Tournament Organizers Sue Website For Reporting Chess Moves, Claim Copyright Infringement</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100604/1516129698.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100604/1516129698.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Some days you just shake your head in disbelief.  A year ago, we wrote about a Bulgarian chess federation was <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090305/0158524003.shtml">demanding</a> that websites stop broadcasting what moves were happening in its chess tournament, claiming it was a copyright violation.  As we noted at the time, you're not supposed to be able to copyright facts, such as chess moves, otherwise it would make playing chess itself pretty damn difficult.  It appears that this year, the organizers of this Bulgarian chess festival are taking it up a notch.  <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/profile.php?u=jshtaylo">Jeff T</a> alerts us to the stunning news that they have actually <a href="http://www.chessvibes.com/reports/bulgarian-organizers-take-to-court-chessbase/" target="_blank">sued a German website for reporting what moves were happening</a>.
<br /><br />
The article goes a bit more into the legal strategy, and highlights the insanity of certain copyright laws.  As we've discussed in the past, Europe has "database rights" -- a concept the US has (mostly) rejected -- which do grant the ability to apply copyrights on <i>collections</i> of facts, under the slightly warped theory that this kind of incentive is needed to aggregate those facts into a database.  Of course, research has been done on this for <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050225/1728231.shtml">years</a>, and they prove, without a doubt, that database rights appear to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080907/1642432187.shtml">hold back</a> database businesses!  Comparing identical industries in the US (without database rights) and Europe (with database rights) shows that the US industries are <i>significantly larger</i>.  Thus, if the whole point of the database right is to encourage creation of more databases, it has empirically failed.
<br /><br />
And... on top of that, it leads to absolutely nonsensical lawsuits like the one above.  The database right is most certainly not intended to protect a list of chess moves.  It's intended (though, it fails on this) to provide incentives to create databases.  The idea that people would not play chess without a database right is obviously ridiculous.  But, the Bulgarian chess folks are insisting the law is on their side.  If the case were filed in the US it would be tossed pretty quickly.  Hopefully the same is true in Germany as well.  There is simply no legitimate reason to block reporting on the factual nature of chess moves.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100604/1516129698.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100604/1516129698.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100604/1516129698.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>is-that-the-spanish-opening-or-the-king's-gambit?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100604/1516129698</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:06:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Forget Video Games, Why Aren't Politicians Complaining About Chess?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090628/1613445386.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090628/1613445386.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ President Obama is the latest in a rather long line of politicians to start <a href="http://www.gamepolitics.com/2009/06/15/obama-names-video-games-health-concern-speech-ama" target="_new">calling out video games</a> as being something that is bad for kids and should be taken away from them, as encouragement to go outside and play:
<blockquote><i>
The second step that we can all agree on is to invest more in preventive care so that we can avoid illness and disease in the first place. That starts with each of us taking more responsibility for our health and the health of our children. It means quitting smoking, going in for that mammogram or colon cancer screening. It means going for a run or hitting the gym, and <b>raising our children to step away from the video games and spend more time playing outside</b>.
</i></blockquote>
Of course, there's been very little evidence that playing video games alone somehow leads kids to be less active or to play less outside, but it may also be worth putting this into a historical context.  Tom sends in a look back at <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=100-years-ago-baseballs" target="_new">some old quotes from Scientific American</a>, where the last one on the page, written in July of 1859 -- yes 150 years ago -- sounds quite similar to Obama's comments on video games, but is in reference to that pernicious child-obesity-causing monstrosity we call "chess":
<blockquote><i>
"A pernicious excitement to learn and play chess has spread all over the country, and numerous clubs for practicing this game have been formed in cities and villages. Why should we regret this? It may be asked. We answer, chess is a mere amusement of a very inferior character, which robs the mind of valuable time that might be devoted to nobler acquirements, while it affords no benefit whatever to the body. Chess has acquired a high reputation as being a means to discipline the mind, but persons engaged in sedentary occupations should never practice this cheerless game; they require out-door exercises--not this sort of mental gladiatorship."
</i></blockquote>
You heard them!  No more chess playing, you kids!<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090628/1613445386.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090628/1613445386.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090628/1613445386.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>sedentary-occupations!</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090628/1613445386</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:02:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Can You Copyright A Chess Move?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090305/0158524003.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090305/0158524003.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Stephen S. Power alerts us to an ongoing debate in the chess world over the question of <a href="http://www.chessvibes.com/columns/copyright-on-chess-moves-shadows-on-the-wall/" target="_new">whether or not you can copyright a chess move</a>.  Specifically, the current debate arises from a demand by the Bulgarian Chess Federation that certain websites stop "live broadcasting" a chess match, saying that it violates copyright law.  I'm certainly not familiar enough with Bulgarian copyright law to know if it actually could be interpreted in such a ridiculous manner, but in the US, at least, lawsuits have clearly stated that reporting on the facts and data from a sporting event is perfectly legal under copyright law.  Most of the article focuses on the philosophical questions concerning whether or not a chess move can be "owned," but it's hard to think about the issue in any terms and come up with a good explanation for how such a move could be covered by copyright law.  If you take that to the extreme, it would mean that you simply couldn't play chess.  Whoever played the first few games would "own" most of the opening moves and everyone else would be out of luck.  I imagine that the copyright supporters might insist that this would only force other players to use new moves, thereby increasing their creative output.  Yes... I'm being sarcastic here, but it does highlight just how silly it is to even think about the idea of copyrighting chess moves, or even a collection of chess moves in terms of "broadcasting" a match.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090305/0158524003.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090305/0158524003.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090305/0158524003.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>well,-no...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090305/0158524003</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>