Techdirt. Stories filed under "cease-and-desist" Easily digestible tech news... http://www.techdirt.com/ en-us Techdirt. Stories filed under "cease-and-desist"http://www.techdirt.com/images/td-88x31.gifhttp://www.techdirt.com/ Mon, 13 Apr 2009 06:01:00 PDT Goldman Sachs Doesn't Pay Attention: Threatens Gripe Site Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090412/2233464469.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090412/2233464469.shtml not to freak out and go legal when they saw a "gripes site" show up, it appears that Goldman Sachs has done exactly that. The company and its lawyers have apparently been threatening the site GoldmanSachs666.com. The company is pulling out the oldest trick in the book, claiming that Goldman Sachs customers are "confused" by the site:
"Your use of the mark Goldman Sachs violates several of Goldman Sachs' intellectual property rights, constitutes an act of trademark infringement, unfair competition and implies a relationship and misrepresents commercial activity and/or an affiliation between you and Goldman Sachs which does not exist and additionally creates confusion in the marketplace,"
This is a stretch. Many, many courts have found that such sites are perfectly legitimate, because no one would confuse a site complaining about a company for the company itself. It's likely that Goldman Sachs felt that sending the cease-and-desist would scare the blogger into shutting up. But... as with so many of these things, all it's actually done is draw a hell of a lot more attention to the site. You would think that the bank would have a few more important things to be focused on than some ranting blogger. Indeed, the fact that they seem to want him to shut up, gives him a lot more legitimacy than if the bank had simply ignored him. The fact that management or the lawyers (or both) think this is a big enough issue to deal with suggests that they're actually concerned about what he's saying.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
]]> this-will-end-badly http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090412/2233464469 Tue, 17 Jun 2008 06:32:00 PDT Why Do You Need A Doctor's Note To Get A Genetic Test? Mike Masnick http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080616/2222471429.shtml http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080616/2222471429.shtml other personal genetic testing services may actually be breaking California law. California has sent a bunch of these firms cease-and-desist letters demanding they close up shop until certain conditions are met.

Apparently any labs doing the tests need to get both state and federal certification and can only do tests based on a physician's recommendation. The state claims it sent the letters after receiving "multiple consumer complaints about the accuracy and costs of genetic testing advertised on the Internet." This seems quite questionable for a variety of reasons. First, if people have "complaints" about the costs... then the proper response is to simply not buy the test. I have complaints about the price of Ferraris, but I'm not going to complain to the state of California -- and I doubt that the state would send cease and desist letters to Ferrari dealers.

Secondly, it seems quite ridiculous to say that these sorts of tests can only be taken with permission from a physician. There seems no reason not to let those who are willing to pay the associated fees to get a personal genetic test without involving a physician at all. As we move more and more towards more personalized medicine, this problem is only going to come up more and more. Not all medical tests and treatments need to be done under a doctor's care -- and requiring it in all cases seems more like a way to protect physicians' fees rather than citizens' health.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
]]> makes-no-sense http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080616/2222471429