<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;cars&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Standing In The Alpha-Beta Parking Lot....</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1406149808/dailydirt-standing-alpha-beta-parking-lot.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1406149808/dailydirt-standing-alpha-beta-parking-lot.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ City planning in the future might have to take into account some technologies that sound like science fiction from the 1960s. Probably no flying cars, but there could be autonomous vehicles and less sprawl. Owning a car might not even be practical. In any case, parking lots will likely be long gone, and here are just a few links on some interesting parking situations.

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/the_million_parking_space_AjkgazGpILpNDaRLPm1iyK" href="http://nyp.st/MbJLId">What goes well with a liveried chauffeur? Perhaps a parking spot that costs a million bucks.</a> The first parking spot in NYC listed for $1 million is in a private garage at 66 E. 11th St. [<a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/the_million_parking_space_AjkgazGpILpNDaRLPm1iyK">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/06/realestate/commercial/06park.html" href="http://nyti.ms/KsFqPx">One of the first automated parking garages opened in NYC in 2002 -- and it dropped a few cars before working out its bugs.</a> But now, car owners don't have to worry about parking attendants (like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Edson">Richard Edson</a>) taking cars out for joyrides... [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/06/realestate/commercial/06park.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/38965/" href="http://bit.ly/K4NoyT">When cars can drive themselves, they'll just drop us off, circle the block and/or park themselves somewhere (hopefully in a good neighborhood).</a> They could also meet up with their other robot-car friends at the automated parking garage and waste time chatting about power converters.... [<a href="http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/38965/">url</a>]</li>

<li><b>To find some more bizarre/crazy stuff, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:426" href="http://bit.ly/rghIeN">check out some things that other StumbleUpon users have found.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:426">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1406149808/dailydirt-standing-alpha-beta-parking-lot.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1406149808/dailydirt-standing-alpha-beta-parking-lot.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100614/1406149808/dailydirt-standing-alpha-beta-parking-lot.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100614/1406149808</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Who Drives Best -- Men, Women... Or Robots?</title>
<dc:creator>Joyce Hung</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120207/11315417688/dailydirt-who-drives-best-men-women-robots.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120207/11315417688/dailydirt-who-drives-best-men-women-robots.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ If you believe in gender stereotypes, then you probably think that men are better drivers than women. However, auto insurance companies are inclined to believe that women are actually safer drivers. It's a hotly debated topic, but it's safe to say that there are lots of bad drivers -- both men and women -- on the road. That's why we need robot cars. Here are a few links to some driving-related studies.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/18/nyregion/18drivers.html" href="http://nyti.ms/yOnS7S">A New York City traffic study found that male drivers were responsible for 80% of car accidents in which pedestrians were severely injured or killed.</a> Blame it on testosterone, which increases aggression and risk-taking. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/18/nyregion/18drivers.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/07/women_worse_drivers_more_crashes_than_men_less_driving.html" href="http://bit.ly/zqZM6u">A University of Michigan analysis of 6.5 million car accidents in the U.S. between 1998-2007 found that female drivers were responsible for 68.1% of all crashes. </a> Apparently, women have trouble navigating intersections, as they were most often hit on the driver's or passenger side while trying to turn left or right. [<a href="http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2011/07/women_worse_drivers_more_crashes_than_men_less_driving.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9047627/Women-are-better-at-parking-than-men-study-suggests.html" href="http://tgr.ph/y3qxaG">A more recent UK study showed that women are actually better at parking than men, dispelling the myth that men have better spatial awareness than women.</a> According to the professional driving instructor who created the study, men learn and perform better during driving lessons, but it's possible that women retain what they learn better than men.  [<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9047627/Women-are-better-at-parking-than-men-study-suggests.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125883649914708.html" href="http://on.wsj.com/w8WapJ">Let the car park itself. Many automakers, including Ford, Toyota, and BMW, are offering self-parking systems in their vehicles now. </a> While they can guide cars into parking spaces with minimal driver involvement, they aren't always reliable. [<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703734504575125883649914708.html">url</a>]</li>

<li><b>To discover more interesting car-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:68" href="http://bit.ly/hPspBb">check out what's driving around StumbleUpon.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:68">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120207/11315417688/dailydirt-who-drives-best-men-women-robots.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120207/11315417688/dailydirt-who-drives-best-men-women-robots.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120207/11315417688/dailydirt-who-drives-best-men-women-robots.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120207/11315417688</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Autonomous Vehicles</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100111/1939327709/dailydirt-autonomous-vehicles.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100111/1939327709/dailydirt-autonomous-vehicles.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Autonomous vehicles are getting better and better all the time as their software learns to navigate all kinds of terrain. Commercial airlines have been using autopilot systems for years, but nowadays more autonomous cars could be driving next to humans. It's either a really scary idea or a brilliant new way to commute. Here are just a few more links on robot vehicles that are being set loose.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/03/24-hours-of-lemons-now-welcomes-driverless-entries/" href="http://aol.it/AB5kW9">The 24 Hours of LeMons is an endurance race for clunker cars (no cars worth more than $500), but this year, they've added a prize for autonomous vehicles.</a> The X Ceedingly Bad Idea Prize will award $50,000 to a driverless junker that can cross the finish line without hurting anyone. [<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/02/03/24-hours-of-lemons-now-welcomes-driverless-entries/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2012/02/autonomous-vehicles-q-and-a/" href="http://bit.ly/zZ7LKT">Wired has interviewed several autonomous vehicle experts, which means a lot of hedged predictions on the future of self-driving cars on public roads.</a> But automated airplane pilots seem to have gained more acceptance than replacing human drivers on the roads. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2012/02/autonomous-vehicles-q-and-a/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-12/marines-afghanistan-execute-first-cargo-resupply-unmanned-helo" href="http://bit.ly/xZN1Kf">NATO troops in Afghanistan have successfully received resupply cargo from an unmanned helicopter.</a> Kaman Aerospace's K-MAX can carry 3.5 tons of cargo about 250 miles, and it may help reduce human casualties (for one side of battle, at least). [<a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-12/marines-afghanistan-execute-first-cargo-resupply-unmanned-helo">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting robotics-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:335" href="http://bit.ly/fm7LdW">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:335">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100111/1939327709/dailydirt-autonomous-vehicles.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100111/1939327709/dailydirt-autonomous-vehicles.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100111/1939327709/dailydirt-autonomous-vehicles.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100111/1939327709</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:11:42 PST</pubDate>
<title>Oh No! Car Dealers Might Have To Deal With Informed Customers! That Must Be Illegal!</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120213/04002117742/oh-no-car-dealers-might-have-to-deal-with-informed-customers-that-must-be-illegal.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120213/04002117742/oh-no-car-dealers-might-have-to-deal-with-informed-customers-that-must-be-illegal.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A few folks sent over this recent NY Times article about how the traditional auto sales world was apparently <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/11/your-money/car-dealers-wince-at-a-site-to-end-sales-haggling.html?sq=truecar&st=cse&scp=1&pagewanted=all" target="_blank">up in arms about a company called TrueCar</a> that seeks to make the process of buying cars easier by providing more info to buyers about what cars are actually selling for, what the dealers' true prices are, and also offering guaranteed "haggle free" prices from certain dealers.  To be honest, this really doesn't sound all that different from a few other services online.  The last two times I've bought cars, I've been able to get good deals using online services like this and just emailing directly to dealers (and for anyone buying a car, I can't recommend <a href="http://www.carbuyingtips.com/" target="_blank">CarBuyingTips.com</a> enough, even with its 90's era web design -- that site has saved me a ton).
<br /><br />
However, what's really incredible is how the industry has reacted to this site -- basically freaking out and whining about how consumers actually being informed might put them all out of business.  The excuses are typical of what you'll find with an industry that works on a collusion or gatekeeper system when it's finally faced with real competition.  They start talking about how real competition is evil and how it will lead to a worse situation with <i>more scams</i>.  In fact, TrueCar got hit with claims that what it was doing, in providing consumers with more info, was <i>illegal</i>.  They've even had to change their practices in some states -- which really only goes to show just how much car dealers have influenced various state laws in their favor to protect against true competition and an informed consumer.
<blockquote><i>
Others, including Honda, have argued that TrueCar could open the door to unscrupulous dealers trying to sell a more expensive car or more options once they get the customers in the door &#8212; which Honda said reflected poorly on the brand. Honda also threatened to cut off marketing dollars to dealers who promoted its cars on the site below the invoice price, a price that is supposed to represent something close to the dealer&#8217;s cost (though dealers usually make more money on other manufacturer incentives and programs).
</i></blockquote>
Think of just how convoluted and insane this argument is.  Honda doesn't want informed consumers because (wait for it...) informed consumers might lead dealers to try to trick buyers.  Seriously.  Okay, time to cross Honda off any future potential car list.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120213/04002117742/oh-no-car-dealers-might-have-to-deal-with-informed-customers-that-must-be-illegal.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120213/04002117742/oh-no-car-dealers-might-have-to-deal-with-informed-customers-that-must-be-illegal.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120213/04002117742/oh-no-car-dealers-might-have-to-deal-with-informed-customers-that-must-be-illegal.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>felony-interference-of-a-business-model</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120213/04002117742</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: More Plastic Cars</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101020/11552911505/dailydirt-more-plastic-cars.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101020/11552911505/dailydirt-more-plastic-cars.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It's been a while since the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_Fiero">Pontiac Fiero</a> was considered a "radical" car. If you don't remember it, the Fiero had a plastic body -- which some folks said made it unsafe (even though owners of it were more likely to be injured from an engine fire). Plastic cars have continued to improve, and here are just a few more <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110223/10571613233/dailydirt-making-lightweight-cars.shtml">car parts</a> that are being made from environmentally-friendly plastic.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://inhabitat.com/bridgestones-new-air-free-tires-are-100-recyclable/" href="http://bit.ly/z10mbK">Bridgestone has designed some air-free tires from recyclable plastics.</a> These tires aren't quite ready for full-size cars yet, but maybe someday no one will have to check the air pressure in tires. [<a href="http://inhabitat.com/bridgestones-new-air-free-tires-are-100-recyclable/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkanellos/2011/10/27/the-fantastic-plastic-car/" href="http://onforb.es/xha2BQ">Replacing steel in cars with composite materials will make our four-wheeled friends lighter and more fuel efficient.</a> Unfortunately, carbon fiber car parts are still a bit too expensive, but that could change.... [<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelkanellos/2011/10/27/the-fantastic-plastic-car/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/08/24/canadian-researcher-working-on-making-car-plastics-from-mad-cow/" href="http://aol.it/zEmbrV">Car parts from mad cows? Does anyone want to drive a car made from infected cow skulls, brains, nerves, eyes, tonsils and spinal cords?</a> Oh, Canada! [<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/08/24/canadian-researcher-working-on-making-car-plastics-from-mad-cow/">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting car-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:68" href="http://bit.ly/hPspBb">check out what's driving around StumbleUpon.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:68">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101020/11552911505/dailydirt-more-plastic-cars.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101020/11552911505/dailydirt-more-plastic-cars.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101020/11552911505/dailydirt-more-plastic-cars.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101020/11552911505</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:00:23 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Crazy Coincidence, Plagiarism, Or An Obvious Idea For An Electric Car Ad?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110917/01081315991/could-ad-agencies-come-up-with-identical-idea-commercial.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110917/01081315991/could-ad-agencies-come-up-with-identical-idea-commercial.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ David points us to this fantastic post by Ken Segall, entitled <a href="http://kensegall.com/blog/2011/09/creativity-has-many-fathers/" target="_blank">Creativity has many fathers</a>, and analyzing the story of two car commercials that seem quite similar.  The first, for the Nissan LEAF, is below:
<center>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/N7K_hWuPwv0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</center>
The second is from Renault, for the Z.E.:
<center>
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qKg-LPOXIMs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
</center>
The two ads debuted within days of each other.  You might note some similarities.  Or, actually, a <i>ton</i> of similarities.  My first response was to remember that Nissan and Renault are connected at the hip in a slightly odd <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renault-Nissan_Alliance" target="_blank">non-merger alliance</a> where each company owns a substantial stake in the other.  However, the two companies are still mostly separate, and their marketing is apparently entirely separate.  More specifically, the two ads were developed by two different ad agencies -- and apparently neither is particularly happy about this, with each suggesting the other "plagiarized" the ad.  However, neither has been too vocal about this publicly, and no legal action has been threatened.
<br /><br />
Segall digs up the possible reason why, in the form of one more ad... for the Mitsubishi i-Miev.  This commercial came out way before the other two:
<center>
<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="270" src="http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/xiyvnq_i-miev_creation"></iframe>
</center>
Yeah, it's kind of tough to claim someone else plagiarized you, when your ad looks like a blatant copy of yet someone else's...
<br /><br />
Perhaps the reality is that this idea was just so obvious that three different ad agencies came up with it.  It's not hard to see how a brainstorming session might come up with exactly this concept pretty easily.  Or perhaps there really was some copying.  But, in the end, does it really matter?  As Segall notes about all three ads, "Wow, what a fantastic concept."<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110917/01081315991/could-ad-agencies-come-up-with-identical-idea-commercial.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110917/01081315991/could-ad-agencies-come-up-with-identical-idea-commercial.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110917/01081315991/could-ad-agencies-come-up-with-identical-idea-commercial.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>seems-possible</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110917/01081315991</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Bespoke Cars</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110712/15303615068/dailydirt-bespoke-cars.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110712/15303615068/dailydirt-bespoke-cars.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It seems like custom-built cars are getting more attention, lately. Some car enthusiasts are trying to preserve cool-looking cars that could be considered iconic. Other car builders are trying to retrofit old cars with "green" technologies. Here are a few examples. (And maybe someday Xzibit can pimp-my-ride with a biodiesel hybrid powertrain...)
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.mercurynews.com/business-headlines/ci_18407904" href="http://bit.ly/nvBEs5">Converting a classic VW bug into an all-electric vehicle sounds a bit pricey at $25,000.</a> But the battery pack could outlast the vehicle and also serve as a backup power supply for your house? [<a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/business-headlines/ci_18407904">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.n2amotors.com/vehicles.aspx?VehicleID=2" href="http://bit.ly/pIpkcT">What do you get when you combine the front end of a 1957 Chevrolet, the mid-section of a 1958 Impala, and the bold tail fins of a 1959 Chevy?</a> A pretty funky-looking car, apparently. [<a href="http://www.n2amotors.com/vehicles.aspx?VehicleID=2">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ_LwpfU8oE" href="http://bit.ly/q9UhTB">Local Motors has built the first crowd-sourced military vehicle, the XC2V, in just a few weeks.</a> DARPA sponsored this "proof of principle project" to demonstrate how quickly a new military vehicle could be prototyped. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ_LwpfU8oE">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.rickwrench.com/index79master.htm?http://www.rickwrench.com/50dollarpaint.html" href="http://bit.ly/ovggqv">If you want to re-paint your car on a really tight budget, you could actually do it for about $50.</a> Rustoleum, FTW! [<a href="http://www.rickwrench.com/index79master.htm?http://www.rickwrench.com/50dollarpaint.html">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting car-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:68" href="http://bit.ly/hPspBb">check out what's driving around StumbleUpon.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:68">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110712/15303615068/dailydirt-bespoke-cars.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110712/15303615068/dailydirt-bespoke-cars.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110712/15303615068/dailydirt-bespoke-cars.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110712/15303615068</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:20:08 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Disney: When We Copy, It's Inspiration; When You Copy, It's Infringement</title>
<dc:creator>Timothy Geigner</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110620/04343514759/disney-when-we-copy-its-inspiration-when-you-copy-its-infringement.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110620/04343514759/disney-when-we-copy-its-inspiration-when-you-copy-its-infringement.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Ah, Disney.&nbsp; You have to love a group of people with the ability to compartmentalize their views on matters like intellectual property to the level of these folks.&nbsp; We're talking about a company that plants its mouse-shaped flag firmly in the land of family values...and then attempts to oddly <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110513/16472514270/disney-trademarks-seal-team-6-two-days-after-seal-team-6-kills-bin-laden.shtml">trademarks a term</a> associated with military operations and death.&nbsp; This same company is part of the chorus of folks out there decrying the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110324/17550313619/debunking-claim-that-bad-things-happen-when-works-fall-into-public-domain.shtml">public domain as a wasteland of unused creation</a>... despite the fact that many of their best-selling products are built off of public domain works.  I mean, this is the bastion of creation that <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101108/12333111766/remix-artists-pogo-expecting-to-be-sued-by-disney-for-releasing-latest-remix-created-for-disney.shtml"><em>hired</em> a guy to do some remixes for them...and then <em>refused</em>&nbsp;to release those works</a>.</p><p>And so it will come as a great shock to perhaps a couple of loin-cloth clad pygmies somewhere in the Amazon Rainforest when reader JMT alerts us that Disney, all-powerful harborer of their intellectual property, managed to be so inspired by a New Zealand-created supercar (called the Hulme CanAm Spyder) that they pretty much <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501119&#038;objectid=10733135">copied the design exactly</a> for their upcoming Cars 2 movie.&nbsp; The link to the New Zealand Herald discusses the situation with the car manufacturer's director, Jock Freemantle:</p><blockquote><p><i>&quot;Everybody is telling us, 'it's your car'. I have had emails from around the world saying it looks like our car. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.&quot; </i></p></blockquote><p>Oh, if only Disney had the same perspective as this Kiwi with the possibly single most-fun-to-say name of all time.&nbsp; Why is it that Disney, grim reaper of the copyright/trademark realm, has no problem with this?&nbsp; It's not like this is even the first time the Cars movie series has dealt with this kind of thing, having been <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101217/04203712317/court-rejects-publicity-rights-claim-over-pixars-lead-car-cars.shtml">through the court system over publicity rights</a> concerning a car in the first Cars movie.&nbsp; Take a look at the image comparison below and decide for yourself how closely Disney's car resembles the CanAm Spyder (hint: if your determination is anything other than &quot;Disney's looks <em>exactly</em> the same, except Disney's looks like they fed a bunch of Skittles to pigeons and then made them fly over the car to, er, color it," then you're insane).&nbsp; The irony of this rip off design bearing the name &quot;Rip&quot; in the movie isn't lost on anyone, either.</p><p>To make this as clear as day, the issue is <em>not</em> that Disney used a real life car as inspiration for one of their cartoon movie characters.&nbsp; Rather, the problem is that if the roles in this story were reversed, Disney likely would have pooped its pants as a result from filing a lawsuit with the kind of speed that'd put the Spyder supercar to shame.&nbsp; As one recent commentor put it in an unrelated story, Disney: Sue Thyself.</p><center><img src="http://i.imgur.com/oxB0O.jpg" /></center><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110620/04343514759/disney-when-we-copy-its-inspiration-when-you-copy-its-infringement.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110620/04343514759/disney-when-we-copy-its-inspiration-when-you-copy-its-infringement.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110620/04343514759/disney-when-we-copy-its-inspiration-when-you-copy-its-infringement.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>hypocrisy-you-has-it</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110620/04343514759</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Jun 2011 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Biodegradable Materials Are Good For... Cars?</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110210/13295413042/dailydirt-biodegradable-materials-are-good-cars.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110210/13295413042/dailydirt-biodegradable-materials-are-good-cars.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Lots of folks are working on projects to make car parts out of biodegradable materials. Growing car parts sounds like a cool idea, but there are still some bugs to be worked out (sometimes literally). Here are just a few examples of green materials that <i>might</i> make it into cars someday.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/11/ford-says-theres-wealth-in-weeds/" href="http://nyti.ms/imjJ9a">Latex from dandelions can be used as a plastics modifier for various car parts such as floor mats, cup holders and interior trim pieces.</a> That's nice, and dandelions can make a nice salad, as well... [<a href="http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/05/11/ford-says-theres-wealth-in-weeds/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.theengineer.co.uk/news/team-looks-at-possibility-of-biodegradable-cars/1005307.article" href="http://bit.ly/kSJKTO">Biodegradable car parts could be made with natural fiber composite materials.</a> But will the cars biodegrade before or after 10 years or 100,000 miles? [<a href="http://www.theengineer.co.uk/news/team-looks-at-possibility-of-biodegradable-cars/1005307.article">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.allcaradvice.com/news/1050343_rabbits-cause-no-start-symptom-at-airport" href="http://hgm.me/kMCwJf">Adding soy oil to rubber sounds like a good idea -- until little woodland creatures start chewing on your electrical wiring.</a> Rabbits have been known to eat through that new-car wiring... [<a href="http://www.allcaradvice.com/news/1050343_rabbits-cause-no-start-symptom-at-airport">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Researchers-sub-feathers-for-petroleum-in-plastic-1364697.php" href="http://bit.ly/mUkw7s">Getting the keratin from feathers into plastics could help turn a waste product into useful materials that aren't made from petroleum.</a> But all the 3 billion pounds of leftover chicken feathers won't even put that much of a dent in petroleum-based plastics production.  [<a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Researchers-sub-feathers-for-petroleum-in-plastic-1364697.php">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting car-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:68" href="http://bit.ly/hPspBb">check out what's driving around StumbleUpon.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:68">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110210/13295413042/dailydirt-biodegradable-materials-are-good-cars.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110210/13295413042/dailydirt-biodegradable-materials-are-good-cars.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110210/13295413042/dailydirt-biodegradable-materials-are-good-cars.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110210/13295413042</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 May 2011 19:04:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Nevada Looking To Proactively Legalize Autonomous Cars</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110506/03095114180/nevada-looking-to-proactively-legalize-autonomous-cars.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110506/03095114180/nevada-looking-to-proactively-legalize-autonomous-cars.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There's been a lot of advancement lately in the field of autonomous cars.  The DARPA Grand Challenge a few years ago convinced many people that autonomous vehicles were possible and since then we've been seeing more and more work on concepts around such vehicles, including Google's <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101010/23395911351/google-secretly-tested-autonomous-vehicles-on-the-road.shtml">secret testing</a> of its own autonomous cars and some other researchers doing an <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/14361511655/getting-closer-to-autonomous-cars-vans-make-the-trip-from-italy-to-china.shtml">autonomous drive</a> from Italy to China.  However, with Google, it needed to get special permission to take the car out on the roads, and apparently some politicians in Nevada are working hard to court autonomous vehicle manufacturers to its state.  They've put together a bill that would <a href="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/node/6663" target="_blank">make it easier to get autonomous vehicles on the road</a> in the state, by setting up a process to "authorize" such vehicles, and allow them to operate on Nevada highways.
<br /><br />
As Ryan Calo notes in his post (the one linked above)  about this, it's great that Nevada is taking a proactive approach, however, he does worry about some of the broad language:
<blockquote><i>
The bill's definition of autonomous vehicles is unclear, even circular. Autonomous driving exists on a spectrum. Many vehicles available today have autonomous features, while falling short of complete computer control. Surely the bill's authors do not intend to require that, for instance, today's self-parking Lexus LS 460L be tested and certified. 
</i></blockquote>
Either way, it's exciting to think that such vehicles are getting closer to being available to the public.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110506/03095114180/nevada-looking-to-proactively-legalize-autonomous-cars.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110506/03095114180/nevada-looking-to-proactively-legalize-autonomous-cars.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110506/03095114180/nevada-looking-to-proactively-legalize-autonomous-cars.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>paving-the-road-to-the-future</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110506/03095114180</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:40:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Does Your Car Need Its Own App Store?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110318/01354713533/does-your-car-need-its-own-app-store.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110318/01354713533/does-your-car-need-its-own-app-store.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Many years back, I remember hearing Jonathan Schwartz (before he was CEO of Sun) predict that one day people would buy "horntones" for their cars, the same way they bought ringtones for their mobile phones.  While we haven't quite reached that point yet, it appears that people may soon be buying "apps" for their cars.  <a href="http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/11/03/18/0055228/Tesla-CEO-Says-Model-S-Will-Support-Third-Party-Apps?from=twitter" target="_blank">Slashdot</a> points us to the news that Tesla has announced that (as many predicted) the giant touchscreen console on its Tesla S sedan <a href="http://www.greencarreports.com/blog/1056934_tesla-ceo-model-s-will-support-third-party-apps" target="_blank">will have support for third-party apps</a>.  Don't like the stereo interface?  Download a new one. Want a program that provides you better analytics on your driving habits?  Download it.  While I'm still pretty skeptical about the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100120/2344317854.shtml">appification of everything</a>, I am intrigued by the idea of being able to customize a car via apps.  The real question is if there will really be enough demand to make it worthwhile for developers... and if this means that we're going to face another standards battle as people try to standardize what in-dash apps look like.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110318/01354713533/does-your-car-need-its-own-app-store.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110318/01354713533/does-your-car-need-its-own-app-store.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110318/01354713533/does-your-car-need-its-own-app-store.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>apptastic</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110318/01354713533</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Jan 2011 17:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Automotive Apps And Other Car Stuff</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101220/00161112333/dailydirt-automotive-apps-other-car-stuff.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101220/00161112333/dailydirt-automotive-apps-other-car-stuff.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The past year brought some significant changes to the car industry, and the upcoming year is bound to bring a lot more.  Besides just gasoline and diesel, car buyers are going to have a few more options for how their cars are powered.  Fully electric or hybrid cars may only be the start.  While we're still waiting on flying cars to hit the dealerships, here are some quick car-related links. 

<blockquote>
<li> <a href="http://bit.ly/gFeGKt">Fans of Saturn say goodbye to the brand in 2010.</a>  How many other car brands would (or will?) be so thoughtfully eulogized? [<a href="http://jalopnik.com/5724254/">url</a>]
</li><li> <a href="http://bit.ly/ikwuwY">Android-powered car radios could create a nice little app market for commuters.</a>  If you can't use your smartphone while driving, Android-powered radios sound like a pretty geeky work-around. [<a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4088/parrot-asteroid-an-android-head-unit">url</a>]
</li><li> <a href="http://bit.ly/fy9lLM">Don't flash your headlights to warn other drivers about speed traps.</a> At least, don't do it in the UK. [<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1343959/Driver-flashed-headlights-warn-motorists-speed-trap-fined.html">url</a>]
</li><li> <a href="http://bit.ly/dVSaE4">Those "How's My Driving?" bumper stickers are turning to wireless crowdsourcing to find bad drivers.</a>  Insurance companies are gonna love this app... if folks really take to ratting on their fellow drivers. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/12/new-app-marks-the-end-of-automotive-anonymity/">url</a>]
</li> 
</blockquote><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101220/00161112333/dailydirt-automotive-apps-other-car-stuff.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101220/00161112333/dailydirt-automotive-apps-other-car-stuff.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101220/00161112333/dailydirt-automotive-apps-other-car-stuff.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101220/00161112333</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 04:45:58 PST</pubDate>
<title>Court Rejects Publicity Rights Claim Over Pixar's Lead Car  In Cars</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101217/04203712317/court-rejects-publicity-rights-claim-over-pixars-lead-car-cars.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101217/04203712317/court-rejects-publicity-rights-claim-over-pixars-lead-car-cars.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've talked a lot lately about the rise of <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101020/03475811495/the-rise-of-a-new-intellectual-property-category-ripe-for-trolling-publicity-rights.shtml">"publicity rights"</a> as a new, and dangerous, area of the law that is being used to stifle forms of speech.  The idea behind it was somewhat admirable.  It was to prevent companies from pretending someone famous endorsed their product when they did not.  But the law has been stretched and stretched and stretched in ridiculous ways with a series of ridiculous rulings.  Thankfully, the courts don't always let the really ridiculous cases go forward, such as the case where  Mark Brill claims that Disney/Pixar's movie <i>Cars</i> <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/appeals-court-pixar-didnt-steal-60848" target="_blank">violated his publicity rights</a>, because he owns a racecar that looks similar to the lead character in the movie, Lightning McQueen (voiced by Owen Wilson).  The article notes that "Apparently Brill is a big deal in the racing world and is closely associated with such a car." Of course, if he was that big of a deal, you would think that doing a Google image search for "Mark Brill, race car" would turn up some images.  And I can't find any...  Either way, the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals has upheld a lower court's summary judgment against Brill, saying:
<blockquote><i>
"a fictional, talking, driver-less red race car with the number 95 on it cannot be construed as a likeness of a driver of a similarly colored/numbered race car."
</i></blockquote>
Nice to know there are some limits on publicity rights.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101217/04203712317/court-rejects-publicity-rights-claim-over-pixars-lead-car-cars.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101217/04203712317/court-rejects-publicity-rights-claim-over-pixars-lead-car-cars.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101217/04203712317/court-rejects-publicity-rights-claim-over-pixars-lead-car-cars.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>publicity-rights-over-cars?!?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101217/04203712317</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:10:05 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Getting Closer To Autonomous Cars: Vans Make The Trip From Italy To China</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/14361511655/getting-closer-to-autonomous-cars-vans-make-the-trip-from-italy-to-china.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/14361511655/getting-closer-to-autonomous-cars-vans-make-the-trip-from-italy-to-china.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Back in July we mentioned that some researchers had begun an attempt to have <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100721/00461310302.shtml">an autonomous vehicle</a> drive safely from Italy to China.  Then, about a month ago, we also noted that Google had been <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101010/23395911351/google-secretly-tested-autonomous-vehicles-on-the-road.shtml">successfully testing</a> autonomous vehicles on the roads as well.  Now, <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/10/29/1224233/Vans-Drive-Themselves-Across-the-World" target="_blank">Slashdot</a> alerts us to the news that the <a href="http://www.techeye.net/science/vans-drive-themselves-across-the-world" target="_blank">Italy to China effort was completed successfully</a>.  As with the Google experiments, it wasn't "perfect."  Apparently, humans had to intervene during a Moscow traffic jam -- and at toll booths.  They also mention that "at one point, a van stopped to pick up hitchhikers."  That's quite a story the hitchhikers must have left with...  Either way, it's nice to see so much research going on in this field.  Hopefully we can start to see some of that research make its way into actual production vehicles, at least to improve accident reduction techniques.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/14361511655/getting-closer-to-autonomous-cars-vans-make-the-trip-from-italy-to-china.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/14361511655/getting-closer-to-autonomous-cars-vans-make-the-trip-from-italy-to-china.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101029/14361511655/getting-closer-to-autonomous-cars-vans-make-the-trip-from-italy-to-china.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>marco...-polo...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101029/14361511655</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 05:08:14 PDT</pubDate>
<title>The Car That's Driven 2.8 Million Miles</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100805/03150810506.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100805/03150810506.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ These days, any time you hear of a car that's been driven over 200,000 miles, it's pretty impressive.  But, apparently for a guy named Irv Gordon, that was just what it took to break in his 1966 Volvo P1800.  <a href="http://twitter.com/Shocklee/status/20327555607" target="_blank">Shocklee</a> points us to the astounding story of Gordon and <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-07/29/the-two-point-eight-million-mile-man" target="_blank">the 2.8 million miles he's put on the beloved car</a>, which he bought new all the way back in 1966.  He's hoping to get it up to 3 million in about 3 years. For anyone who believe "they don't make 'em, like they used to," apparently here's a datapoint.  The guy drives 125-mile  commute daily, but also apparently just loves driving and takes the car all over the place.
<br /><br />
As for repairs and maintenance, obviously he takes pretty good care of the car, but doesn't seem to do anything special, beyond following the factory (not dealer) manual.  He began to realize the car was pretty damn reliable when he surpassed 250,000 miles without needing a single repair beyond basic maintenance.  And, yes, the engine has been rebuilt twice, but he admits that the first time it shouldn't have been.  Volvo, of course, is well aware of Gordon and even gave him a free car years back when he hit 1 million miles.  But he saw no reason to stop driving the original one.  And, if you're wondering, yes, Gordon is in the Guinness Book of World Records.  But he got there way back in 1998 when he only had 1.69 million miles on the car.  Suddenly, "just" having 200,000 miles on a car doesn't seem so special.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100805/03150810506.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100805/03150810506.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100805/03150810506.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>feeling-like-a-slacker-yet?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100805/03150810506</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 01:51:54 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Wait, Now I Need Security Software For My Car, Too?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100516/2107309432.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100516/2107309432.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Remember a few months ago when a disgruntled ex-employee from a car dealer was able to login to the dealer's computer system and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100317/2215398608.shtml">remotely disable</a> over 100 cars?  And, of course, there have been concerns over the ability to use systems like OnStar to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091021/1759416629.shtml">remotely disable</a> cars as well, with concerns about what would happen if malicious hackers were able to get their hands on the controls.  Now, to add to those concerns, some researchers are reporting that modern day car computing <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/science/14hack.html?src=twt&#038;twt=nytimestech" target="_blank">is vulnerable to malicious hacks</a> that could put drivers in danger.
<blockquote><i>
The scientists say that they were able to remotely control braking and other functions, and that the car industry was running the risk of repeating the security mistakes of the PC industry....
<br /><br />
The researchers, financed by the National Science Foundation, tested two versions of a late-model car in both laboratory and field settings. They did not identify the maker or the brand of the car, but said they believed they were representative of the computer network control systems that have proliferated in most cars today.
<br /><br />
The researchers asked what could happen if a hacker could gain access to the network of a car, said Tadayoshi Kohno, a University of Washington computer scientist. He said the research teams were able to demonstrate their ability to circumvent a wide variety of systems critical to the safety of drivers and passengers.
<br /><br />
They also demonstrated what they described as "composite attacks" that showed their ability to insert malicious software and then erase any evidence of tampering after a crash.
<br /><br />
The researchers were able to activate dozens of functions and almost all of them while the car was in motion. 
</i></blockquote>
Happy driving, everyone...
<br /><br />
To be fair, the researchers admit that they did not look at what kinds of "defense" the car might have to block such attacks, but they do point out that those developing car computing systems probably don't have as much experience or concern in the security realm.  For the most part, this sounds like it's not a problem that anyone's going to face in the short-term.  If anything, I'm guessing we'll have a lot more moral panic stories about what will happen before any reports of something bad actually happening.  However, at some point, it seems likely that these sorts of stories will pass over from the hypothetical into the real world, and at that point, I'll be looking for a car that runs on <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1208458199.shtml">open source software</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100516/2107309432.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100516/2107309432.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100516/2107309432.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>trojan-brakes?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100516/2107309432</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:34:59 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Disgruntled Ex-Auto Dealer Employee Hacks Computer System To Disable Over 100 Cars</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100317/2215398608.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100317/2215398608.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Ah, the fun of the electronic age.  A few years back we started hearing about tools to remotely disable a car.  These were talked about as a security system to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091021/1759416629.shtml">recover stolen vehicles</a>, but also as a device to put on leased cars, in case they need to be repossessed.  Of course, once you put that technology on the car, what's to stop someone from abusing it?  Turns out that a disgruntled ex-employee of a car dealership that put such a technology on its cars, was able to log into the computer system using a former co-workers account and then started <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/03/hacker-bricks-cars/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A wired27b %28Blog - 27B Stroke 6 %28Threat Level%29%29" target="_blank">methodically targeting the cars that used that system</a>:
<blockquote><i>
Ramos-Lopez’s account had been closed when he was terminated from Texas Auto Center in a workforce reduction last month, but he allegedly got in through another employee’s account, Garcia says. At first, the intruder targeted vehicles by searching on the names of specific customers. Then he discovered he could pull up a database of all 1,100 Auto Center customers whose cars were equipped with the device. He started going down the list in alphabetical order, vandalizing the records, disabling the cars and setting off the horns.
</i></blockquote>
Good thing he wasn't fired from a hospital that used <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050224/1012219.shtml">internet-connected pacemakers</a>, huh?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100317/2215398608.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100317/2215398608.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100317/2215398608.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>welcome-to-the-new-world</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100317/2215398608</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:30:56 PST</pubDate>
<title>As Cars Get More Complicated, Maybe Open Source Is The Way</title>
<dc:creator>Dennis Yang</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1208458199.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1208458199.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Back in 1999, a <a href="http://www.snopes.com/humor/jokes/autos.asp">well-circulated false press release</a> made the rounds, supposedly written in response to Bill Gates' jab at the auto industry at COMDEX that year.  The memo joked:

<blockquote><em>
If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics: 
<br /><br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1. For no reason at all, your car would crash twice a day. 
</em></blockquote>

Of course, fast forward 10 years, and this is no longer really a joke anymore.  Cars are now more complicated than ever, and now computers play a crucial part in the safe and efficient operation of modern automobiles.  Today's premium vehicles probably contain close to <a href="http://news.discovery.com/tech/toyota-recall-software-code.html">100 million lines</a> of software code.  That fact, coupled with the recent massive Toyota recall, seems to have spurred Slate's Farhad Manjoo to ask "<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2244887/pagenum/all/">Should we be worried that our cars are controlled by software?</a>" 
<br /><br />
Perhaps if you're really into worrying for the sake of worrying, sure, I suppose the increasing complexity of the software in cars seems like a good reason to don a tinfoil hat.  Certainly, compared to cars a quarter century ago, there's a huge amount of new technology between you and the road.  But, cars are also safer and more efficient than ever before.  While it's true that the software in cars may have bugs, that's really nothing new to be that concerned about -- car manufacturers issue recalls and maintenance updates all of the time to deal with not just software bugs, but mechanical problems as well.  In the future, regular software updates may replace oil changes as regular maintenance for cars.  But, the biggest Toyota recalls this year were still <b>mechanical</b> in nature: the <em>floor mats</em> and <em>gas pedals</em>, neither of which are remotely affected by any software in the car.  Finally, as Manjoo points out, driver error is still the most common cause of accidents, so until we remove the human element from the driving equation (along with all of the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog.php?tag=driving+distractions">driving distractions</a>), recalled cars are really nothing to get worked up about.
<br /><br />
That said, Michael A. Spiegel over at the Software Freedom Law Center <a href="http://www.softwarefreedom.org/blog/2010/feb/19/toyota-recall-and-case-open-auditable-source-code/">makes an interesting point about this situation</a>:

<blockquote><em>
If Toyota truly wanted to repair its public image and reputation for quality, it would make its source code available to anyone interested, not just a single government regulator. The public is far more likely to discover bugs and suggest improvements than a relatively small number of overworked and potentially inexperienced government employees.
</em></blockquote>

This is a intriguing proposition for a number of reasons.  By releasing its software to the open source community, they could become key participants in the <a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/01/ff_newrevolution/">growing open source car ecosystem</a>.  By doing so, they could potentially benefit from the collective intelligence of that community looking at their code.  Sure, Toyota may scoff at sharing what they consider to be proprietary IP with potential competitors, but in this case, Toyota could stand to gain more than it would potentially be giving away.  After all, while software definitely is playing a critical part in automotive systems, by itself, it is not the selling point of a car.  Even the e-voting industry is <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091027/1742576699.shtml">coming around</a> to open source, after balking at the idea for years.  For a variety of reasons, the automobile industry seems ripe for the exploration of new models right now.  Programs like CityCarShare and ZipCar could be seen as "Automobiles As A Service" -- so maybe we'll start to see a Red Hat-like automobile company emerge in the near future.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1208458199.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1208458199.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100217/1208458199.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>progress-is-good</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100217/1208458199</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:17:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Honda Sued For Trademark Infringement For Suggesting It Wants To Save The Earth</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100113/0912357730.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100113/0912357730.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Be careful suggesting that you want to "save the earth."  Automaker Honda just did that in an ad with a guy wearing a "save the earth" t-shirt, and for doing so, it got <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/28/environmental-group-sues-honda-for-save-the-earth-trademark-in/" target="_blank">slapped with a trademark infringement lawsuit</a> from the Save the Earth Foundation, which apparently has a trademark on that phrase (and has had it since 1972).  The foundation claims that the ad was implying endorsement by the foundation.  I wonder if <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060330/1829246.shtml">morons in a hurry</a> have any interest in saving the earth.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100113/0912357730.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100113/0912357730.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100113/0912357730.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>okay,-don't-save-the-earth</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100113/0912357730</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:21:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>How Automakers Abuse Intellectual Property Laws To Force You To Pay More For Repairs</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091228/0345127515.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091228/0345127515.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Back in May, we wrote about the effort to get a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090520/1802214956.shtml">Right to Repair bill</a> passed for automobiles:
<center>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://washingtonwatch.com/info/widget.php?id=200516752"></script>
</center> 
So far, thanks in part to lobbying by automakers, that bill hasn't gone very far.  Reader MR sends in this article <a href="http://nctimes.com/news/state-and-regional/article_4ea03fd6-090d-5c2e-bd91-dfb5508495ef.html" target="_blank">exploring both the bill and how automakers have been abusing intellectual property law</a> to force you to pay more.  Basically, as cars become more sophisticated and computerized, automakers are locking up access to those computers, and claiming that access is protected by copyrights.  Mechanics are told they can only access the necessary diagnostics if they pay huge sums -- meaning that many mechanics simply can't repair certain cars, and car owners are forced to go to dealers, who charge significantly higher fees.
<br /><br />
There is no legitimate basis for this at all.  It's a clear misuse of intellectual property laws -- which were never designed for this sort of thing -- to prevent independent auto mechanics from repairing newer cars.  But it's the end result of the increasing creep of intellectual property rights, and the growing computerization of everything.  It allows manufacturers to extend "IP" rights to physical goods, and create all sorts of new monopolies.  In a perfect world, this wouldn't need a separate law.  It would be a clear violation of antitrust laws.  But, we don't live in a perfect world, and for the time being you're probably paying a lot more money to repair your car because of it.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091228/0345127515.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091228/0345127515.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091228/0345127515.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>it's-all-a-big-scam</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091228/0345127515</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:45:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Once Again: The Number Of Patents You Hold Does Not Equal How Much Innovation You've Done</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091106/0339216830.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091106/0339216830.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090426/1855224648.shtml">complained</a> in the past when companies, the press and analysts try to use number of patents as a "proxy" for innovation.  It's quite misleading -- and various <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20070108/162044">studies</a> have made that clear.  You can have tremendous innovation without patents, and you can have tons of patents, without any real innovation.  Yet, as reader <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/profile.php?u=nickpearson">Nick</a> points out, a report looking at the alternative energy auto space <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/next/archives/2009/11/ford_lags_in_al.html" target="_blank">dings Ford for "lagging" in "the alternative energy race"</a> because it doesn't have as many patents as others.  
<br /><br />
This is a real shame, because we've discussed before how the massive patent thickets in the hybrid car space have been <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090708/0055045483.shtml">holding back innovation and development</a> in that space.  In fact, Ford had a big tussle with Toyota a few years back after Toyota sued Ford and the two companies wasted tons of money and time in court, until the court finally pointed out that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/07/05/editorial-attention-i-wall-street-journal-i-ford-does-b-n/" target="_blank">Ford did not infringe</a>.  On top of that, Ford has been one of the earlier adopters of hybrid offerings and remains the <a href="http://www.carsdirect.com/hybrid-cars/hybrid-car-popularity-statistics" target="_blank">third largest</a> hybrid seller after Toyota and Honda.  So, claiming that it's somehow "lagging" because of fewer patents is quite misleading.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091106/0339216830.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091106/0339216830.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091106/0339216830.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>please-stop-that-myth</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091106/0339216830</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 07:51:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Can A Moron Driving A Porsche Recognize The Difference Between The Car And A Pair Of Crocs?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091111/0219396894.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091111/0219396894.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Reader Sceptic alerts us to a new lawsuit that seems perfect (on various levels) for the old "moron in a hurry" trademark test.  Automaker Porsche -- for drivers in a hurry -- has <a href="http://www.footnoted.org/buried-treasure/porsche-vs-crocs/" target="_blank">sent a cease-and-desist letter to footwear maker Crocs</a>, claiming that the company's use of "Cayman" for one of its shoes is a violation of Porche's trademark on the same term.  As the folks at Footnoted point out:
<blockquote><i>
Now few people would probably confuse Crocs <a href="http://www.crocs.com/on/demandware.store/Sites-crocs_us-Site/default/Product-Show?pid=10001">Cayman sandal</a> for the <a href="http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/cayman/">Porsche Cayman</a>. After all, one sells for $29.99 and the other starts at $51,000. 
</i></blockquote>
Of course, this is apparently taking place in Germany, and (tragically) the moron in a hurry test (as far as we know) has still only been used in the UK, the US and Canada.  But here's a perfect opportunity for its introduction (in a hurry) in Germany.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091111/0219396894.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091111/0219396894.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091111/0219396894.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>that's-for-the-judge-to-determine</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091111/0219396894</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:01:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Fake Car Noises Being Added To Many New Cars... May Be Required Soon</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091014/1508516536.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091014/1508516536.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last year, we pointed out that some car companies were <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080806/1718531913.shtml">experimenting</a> with adding fake engine noises to their cars, after complaints were heard that hybrid and electric vehicles were "too quiet" and sneaking up on people.  Apparently, those original experiments are turning into a groundswell.  After some politicians decided to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090430/1258064707.shtml">put forth</a> legislation requiring such sounds, apparently <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/14/automobiles/14hybrid.html?hp" target="_blank">lots of car companies are adding sounds to their cars</a>, such as Nissan's recently announced plan to include <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090921/0141396258.shtml">futuristic</a> <i>Blade Runner</i>-style sounds.  Reading through that NY Times article, it seems like the car companies are less concerned about the safety issues, but are excited about the idea of opening up a new market for selling "car tones" -- like ringtones, but for your car noise.  Can't we just set it to vibrate?  In the meantime, there appears to be <i>no evidence</i> that these hybrid and electric "menaces" are causing any more accidents in their "silent, but deadly" current state.
<center>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://washingtonwatch.com/info/widget.php?id=200514458"></script>
</center><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091014/1508516536.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091014/1508516536.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091014/1508516536.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>vroom-vroom</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091014/1508516536</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 05:55:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Nissan To Add Futuristic Sound Effects To Its Electric Car To Keep It From Hitting Unaware Pedestrians</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090921/0141396258.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090921/0141396258.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Ever wonder why futuristic vehicles in science fiction movies have loud whirring/buzzing noises?  Perhaps it's because of people worried about pedestrians getting hit by silent vehicles.  You may recall that there has been some effort underway to push the makers of hybrid or electric vehicles to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080806/1718531913.shtml">add engine noises</a> to their cars, because the electric engines are "too quiet" and unsuspecting pedestrians who fail to look both ways are getting hit.  Or so we're told.  I've yet to see much actual evidence of the rash of pedestrians-hit-by-Priuses, but the story has gained some legs.  In fact, some politicians are even pushing for <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090430/1258064707.shtml">government mandates</a> to require such cars to be noisier.  In an effort to live up to any such requirements, while still making its all electric vehicle still feel futuristic, apparently Nissan is looking to <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/uptospeed/2009/09/nissan-silent-electric-cars-blade-runner.html" target="_new">add those <i>Blade Runner</i>-style vehicle noises to the upcoming Nissan Leaf</a>.  There's no functional reason for it, other than that they want to make the car noisier, and fake engine noises didn't seem as fun (or, one would imagine, marketable).<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090921/0141396258.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090921/0141396258.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090921/0141396258.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>so-that's-why-they-sound-that-way</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090921/0141396258</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:28:24 PST</pubDate>
<title>Up Next, The Subaru App Store</title>
<dc:creator>Carlo Longino</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/0931583761.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/0931583761.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Mobile-phone makers and operators are falling over themselves trying to launch their own application storefronts following the <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20081223/2337293213.shtml">success</a> of Apple's iPhone App Store. But they're not the only ones: Hughes Telematics, which makes in-car communications and computing systems, says the next generation of its technology, scheduled for release in 2010, will let people <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/15/automobiles/15TECH.html" target="_new">install apps in their cars</a>. Ideas being kicked around now include a carbon-footprint calculator and remote-starting and monitoring software. There are lots of interesting possibilities here, but there's one stumbling block: most cars don't come with any ability to connect to the internet, making distribution difficult and limiting the apps' utility. Solving that issue would be huge, and open up a enormous opportunity for all sorts of new apps and features: streaming audio, traffic information, in-car music downloads and so on. Just as other platforms like mobile phones and computers have benefited from the addition of mobile data connectivity, so too will cars.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/0931583761.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/0931583761.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/0931583761.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>click-click-vroom</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090213/0931583761</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>