<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;capacity&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:22:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>AT&#038;T CEO Says Wireless Networks Aren't Prepared For Data Traffic -- Frankly, He Should Know</title>
<dc:creator>Carlo Longino</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090527/1103125033.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090527/1103125033.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ AT&#038;T CEO Randall Stephenson said this week that <a href="http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&#038;etMailToID=1907327854">US mobile networks can't keep up with all the data traffic</a> being spawned by smartphone users. This is something Stephenson's got a lot of first-hand knowledge about. Earlier this month, AT&#038;T blocked the SlingPlayer app for the iPhone, saying it <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20090513/0947594868.shtml">didn't have the capacity</a> to support it, while the company annoyed lots of geeks with blogs when its network in Austin <a href="http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/03/sxsw-atts-spott/">couldn't keep up</a> with the influx of iPhone users during the SXSW conference in March. Stephenson says the company is taking steps to address the problem by upgrading its 3G network to HSPA+ technology that will double its throughput. The logic here isn't completely clear, though: the new technology will require new device hardware, and furthermore, the real issue is capacity not speed. And capacity doesn't just apply to the mobile network -- each individual cell site's backhaul connection needs to be beefed up, too. But the real solution AT&#038;T and other operators employ to fix this issue may not be a technological one. Stephenson hints that <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2009/05/att_chief_fores.html;jsessionid=0HASVRRPE154AQSNDLPCKHSCJUNN2JVN">flat-rate data plans could be on their way out</a>, with variable-use pricing on its way back in. By bringing back per-unit pricing, operators will hope to increase their revenues from data-hungry users, but all they'll really do is end up stifling mobile data use -- just like they did before they went to flat-rate plans.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090527/1103125033.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090527/1103125033.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090527/1103125033.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>got-some-knowledge-about-this-stuff</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090527/1103125033</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:56:17 PST</pubDate>
<title>Mobile Operators Say Inauguration Will Tax Systems, Provide PR Fodder</title>
<dc:creator>Carlo Longino</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081216/1039033142.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081216/1039033142.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Apparently there are going to be <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5huAIzW7FEq8aC0N2GwdC9WGCtwjw">a lot of people</a> in Washington, DC, next month, for Barack Obama's inauguration. With up to 4 million visitors coming to DC, a city with a population of 1.1 million, there's the potential for a logistical mess. But at least one group is getting out ahead of things: the nation's wireless operators, which want to assure everybody that they're <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081216/tc_nm/us_wireless_inauguration">beefing up capacity</a> ahead of the event... just like they do before every <a href="http://newsreleases.sprint.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=127149&#038;p=irol-newsArticle_newsroom&#038;ID=1097090&#038;highlight=super%20bowl">Super Bowl</a> and other events where there are predictable swells in network traffic. So, even if you aren't traveling to Washington for the inauguration, rest assured that the country's operators are looking out for you, just in case.  And, of course, that they're not missing out on any chance for some PR -- even if it really just highlights their own capacity limitations. One question, though: will any of them come back after the event to detail just how many calls didn't go through on their networks during the inauguration because of capacity constraints?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081216/1039033142.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081216/1039033142.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081216/1039033142.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>no-i-can't-hear-you-now</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20081216/1039033142</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>