<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;cake&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:30:16 PST</pubDate>
<title>The Cake Copyright Is A Lie; Safeway Just Doesn't Want To Be Mocked</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121112/02460021013/cake-copyright-is-lie-safeway-just-doesnt-want-to-be-mocked.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121112/02460021013/cake-copyright-is-lie-safeway-just-doesnt-want-to-be-mocked.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A few folks have sent in this story on the blog of the wonderful (and super popular) site <a href="http://www.cakewrecks.com/" target="_blank">Cake Wrecks</a>, which (as the name suggests) highlights hilariously bad cake designs, supposedly done by "professionals."  Not surprisingly, the site is well known among those who wield cake decorating bags.  However, some do not appreciate the wonders of such a site... especially when it features their own cakes. Cake Wrecks recently put up a blog post in which it reveals that at least one Safeway (a part of the giant supermarket chain) has apparently told its bakery <a href="http://cakewrecks.squarespace.com/home/2012/11/9/ways-to-play-it-safe.html" target="_blank">that there is a "no photography" rule</a>, officially set up to avoid having its cakes show up on the site -- though, they're using copyright as their excuse:
<blockquote><i>
"My local [CENSORED*] bakery has this new policy - not strictly enforced, but kinda enforced - NO PHOTOS in the bakery department. None, nada. Per an ex-employee there, upper management is afraid that one of that store's specific cakes will be posted on 'that bad cake site.' Per what they tell you in the store, their cakes are 'all copyright protected.'"
</i></blockquote>
Furthermore, the person who sent the email was told to stop photographing the following cake, because of "copyright protection!"
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/NEnHk"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/NEnHk.jpg" width=350 /></a>
</center>
You may notice that Safeway is clearly on the label -- but has been "censored" out of the note.  Cake Wrecks amusingly refuses to name the chain in question, but <i>does</i> title its blog post "Ways to Play it Safe."  It also features a whole bunch of photographs of ridiculously designed cakes from Safeway -- many with stickers prominently displaying where they came from.  It's worth checking out the whole bunch, though I'll warn you that one of them might be considered not safe for work, depending on your work environment (though, it's also the type of cake that I imagine our own Dark Helmet would find hilarious).
<br /><br />
Of course, there is a question of whether or not such cakes are actually covered by copyright.  That actually probably depends on each individual cake -- since there has to be some sort of overall creative element added to the cake, and many "standard" cake designs probably <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sc%C3%A8nes_%C3%A0_faire" target="_blank">don't</a> qualify.  Of course, even if the cake <i>is</i> covered by copyright, it seems silly to argue that copyright is a reasonable excuse to ban any and all photographs.  There would be a ridiculously strong fair use claim in response.  The photograph is transformative (it's not a cake, it's a photgraph).  The nature of the work is to disseminate information to the public, which tends to weigh in favor of fair use.  And the effect on the "market" for the copyrighted work is nil.  Now, some may argue that it would impact the market for <i>the cake</i>, but that's because it's showing how ridiculous the cake is, not because it's a substitute.  And, in the famous <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16686162998040575773&#038;hl=en&#038;as_sdt=2&#038;as_vis=1&#038;oi=scholarr" target="_blank">Campbell v. Acuff-Rose</a> case, the Supreme Court made clear:
<blockquote><i>
We do not, of course, suggest that a parody may not harm the market at all, but when a lethal parody, like a scathing theater review, kills demand for the original, it does not produce a harm cognizable under the Copyright Act.
</i></blockquote>
I'd say Cake Wrecks fits into that description nicely.  Either way, even if there <i>was</i> a legitimate copyright claim here, all it does is call that much more attention to the fact that apparently Safeway has pretty horrid quality control for many of its cake designers.  Instead of coming up with ridiculous legal arguments to stop people from photographing their cakes, perhaps they should just <i>find better cake designers</i>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121112/02460021013/cake-copyright-is-lie-safeway-just-doesnt-want-to-be-mocked.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121112/02460021013/cake-copyright-is-lie-safeway-just-doesnt-want-to-be-mocked.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121112/02460021013/cake-copyright-is-lie-safeway-just-doesnt-want-to-be-mocked.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>time-to-take-your-business-elsewhere</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121112/02460021013</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Piece Of Cake</title>
<dc:creator>Joyce Hung</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ For people who are trying to watch their waistline, cake is generally off-limits. Sure, there are ways to make cake "healthier" -- for example, by using less sugar and substituting oil and butter with things like pureed fruit and vegetables or yogurt -- but that cake just won't be as satisfying as a rich and decadent piece of cake made the traditional way. Here's some good news and a few examples of decadence taken to the next level. 

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-02-breakfast-chocolate-cake.html" href="http://bit.ly/JqHsAc">According to researchers from Tel Aviv University, you can lose weight by topping off a 600-calorie balanced breakfast with a piece of cake.</a> Apparently, the key is to have sweets in the morning when the body's metabolism is at its peak, then work off the extra calories during the rest of the day. Over 32 weeks, people who followed this diet actually lost 40 pounds more (and kept the weight off longer) than those who avoided eating sweets altogether. [<a href="http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-02-breakfast-chocolate-cake.html">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.neatorama.com/2011/11/22/a-cherry-pie-an-apple-pie-and-a-pumpkin-pie-each-cooked-inside-a-separate-cake-and-then-all-cooked-together-inside-another-cake/" href="http://bit.ly/Jrnsds">A pastry chef in Wisconsin made a dessert version of a turducken and called it a "cherpumple."</a> The cherpumple consisted of a cherry pie, an apple pie, and a pumpkin pie -- each baked within a cake. Then the cakes were stacked together and covered with frosting to form a giant 21-pound monster of a cake. [<a href="http://www.neatorama.com/2011/11/22/a-cherry-pie-an-apple-pie-and-a-pumpkin-pie-each-cooked-inside-a-separate-cake-and-then-all-cooked-together-inside-another-cake/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://adage.com/article/creativity-pick-of-the-day/u-k-brand-mr-kipling-dispenses-cakes-a-poster/233312/" href="http://bit.ly/KW9nFO">Mr. Kipling, a British baked-goods brand, is promoting its snap-pack "on-the-go" cake products with cake-dispensing posters.</a> Specially converted poster sites will dispense free cake to the public, and some posters will also be sprayed with a special scent to emit the smell of cake. [<a href="http://adage.com/article/creativity-pick-of-the-day/u-k-brand-mr-kipling-dispenses-cakes-a-poster/233312/">url</a>]</li>

<li><b>To discover more food-related links, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:102" href="http://bit.ly/iaJVJd">check out what's floating around in StumbleUpon.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:102">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120502/19393018749/dailydirt-piece-cake.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120502/19393018749</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>