<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;bylines&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:29:55 PST</pubDate>
<title>CNET Reports On Losing CES 'Best In Show' Powers, But Hides Byline</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130131/16441921845/cnet-reports-losing-ces-best-show-powers-hides-byline.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130131/16441921845/cnet-reports-losing-ces-best-show-powers-hides-byline.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ So we just wrote about how CEA had <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130131/11105221840/cea-takes-away-cnets-role-picking-ces-best-show-awards-dish-hopper-best-show.shtml">taken away</a> CNET's ability to name the "best of show" product at CES (then re-named the Dish Hopper with Sling as the Best in Show as CNET staff had originally intended).  Somewhat surprisingly, given the publications' reluctance to say too much about all of this so far, CNET, itself, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57566906-93/cea-gives-dish-hopper-with-sling-best-of-show-award/" target="_blank">reported the story</a>, talking about itself in an almost creepily bland manner, and never even noting the oddity that it is reporting on itself.  However, one tidbit stands out:
<center>
<a href="http://imgur.com/BnI7iVV"><img src="http://i.imgur.com/BnI7iVV.png" width=450/></a>
</center>
See that byline?  It just says "CNET News staff" rather than naming whoever wrote it.  I cannot recall ever seeing that before on CNET.  At the very least, it raises some questions.  Is this a form of a "byline strike" that some journalists have used to protest management practices at other publications?  Is it CNET cowardice in reporting on stories that reflect poorly on CNET?  Is it a random cry for help among CNET reporters, blinking furiously as a signal to the outside world, while trapped inside their CBS-imposed-editorially-compromised prisons, letting us know they're alive and want out?  I'm betting on that last one.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130131/16441921845/cnet-reports-losing-ces-best-show-powers-hides-byline.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130131/16441921845/cnet-reports-losing-ces-best-show-powers-hides-byline.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130131/16441921845/cnet-reports-losing-ces-best-show-powers-hides-byline.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>wtf-is-going-on?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130131/16441921845</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>