<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;bounty&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:34:08 PDT</pubDate>
<title>$17,000+ Bounty Offered For Leaks Of TPP Negotiating Texts</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120822/12121720126/17000-bounty-offered-leaks-tpp-negotiating-texts.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120822/12121720126/17000-bounty-offered-leaks-tpp-negotiating-texts.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've talked about the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120516/01342918937/dear-ron-kirk-transparency-isnt-hearing-critics-its-telling-public-what-youre-doing.shtml">ridiculous secrecy</a> around the negotiating texts for the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement.  It makes no sense to have these documents secret and out of the view of the public, but it's what's happening.  Because of that, we're forced to deal with very occasional <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120804/00173819933/tpp-text-fair-use-leaks-us-proposals-are-really-about-limiting-fair-use-not-expanding-it.shtml">leaks</a> to get a partial view of what's being negotiated in our name without any oversight.  ACTA was a somewhat similar situation, but there were more regular leaks there -- and we've heard that the USTR, in particular, has taken great pains to make it <i>much more difficult</i> to leak TPP text without revealing who leaked it.
<br /><br />
However, it appears that some are (in some ways, quite literally) upping the ante in trying to pressure people into leaking the text.  The folks over at <a href="http://www.zeropaid.com/news/102057/organization-places-bounty-leaking-tpp-through-crowdsourced-funds/?utm_source=twitterfeed&#038;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">ZeroPaid</a> point us to some group that claims to have <a href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1439/content_item/freetpp" target="_blank">raised over $17,000 as a bounty for leaked TPP negotiating texts</a>.  They're asking for more pledges, though I have no idea whether or not the effort is legit.  ZeroPaid points out that the site appears to be a project of <a href="http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/" target="_blank">Just Foreign Policy</a>, which seems to at least <a href="http://www2.guidestar.org/organizations/56-2587092/just-foreign-policy.aspx#" target="_blank">be a legitimate organization</a>, according to Guidestar.  For what it's worth, the site also claims that you won't actually have to pay until the text is leaked, at which point they will ask you to fulfill your pledge.
<br /><br />
The group's concerns seem reasonable as well:
<blockquote><i>
The TPP negotiations have taken place under an unprecedented shroud of secrecy, denying all but a very few any input into the terms of the agreement. The chapters that have been leaked are quite disturbing, revealing plans that would threaten public health, the environment, internet freedom, and the general well-being of perhaps billions of people. Here's a little taste of what the agreement would include: foreign investor protections that would help corporations offshore jobs, powers that allow multinational corporations to challenge domestic regulations before international tribunals, a strengthening of patent and intellectual property rules which would, among other things, raise the price of life-saving medicines in third world countries, and the ability for Wall Street to roll back safeguards meant to restore financial stability worldwide.
</i></blockquote>
Will this be incentive enough for someone to leak the text?  I'm not so sure.  I'd think that someone's basic conscience about having access to such a document should be a better reason, but you never know...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120822/12121720126/17000-bounty-offered-leaks-tpp-negotiating-texts.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120822/12121720126/17000-bounty-offered-leaks-tpp-negotiating-texts.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120822/12121720126/17000-bounty-offered-leaks-tpp-negotiating-texts.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>go-ahead-and-claim-the-money-ustr</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120822/12121720126</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:11:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Microsoft's Virus Bounty Plan Sound Familiar? It Should</title>
<dc:creator>Carlo Longino</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/1049533765.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/1049533765.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ When I started seeing stories all over the web about <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/ptech/02/13/virus.downadup/?iref=mpstoryview" target="_new">Microsoft's offer of a $250,000 bounty</a> for the authors of the Conficker virus, I thought that the plan sounded awfully familiar. Going through the Techdirt archives, I turned up some stories on bounties for <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20050527/0135208.shtml">phishers</a> and <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20040916/1948237.shtml">spammers</a>, then found a post from 2003 talking about how the company had set aside <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20031105/0747259.shtml">$5 million</a> for bounties on people who wrote viruses and worms. While it's not clear if Microsoft has actually paid out any of that cash, it is pretty clear that the bounty plan hasn't done much to make Windows any more secure since it was announced. And neither will this latest bounty. Like the previous plan, it's gotten Microsoft tons of press that makes the company <a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20031111/0218204.shtml">look tough</a> -- but it doesn't solve the underlying security problems of the Windows platform. Catching the people who wrote the Conficker worm won't undo any of the problems they've exposed, and it certainly won't make Windows users any more secure.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/1049533765.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/1049533765.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090213/1049533765.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>worked-so-well-the-first-time</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090213/1049533765</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>