<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;allowance&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:21:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Giving An Allowance Patented: Acacia Sues Apple</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080212/021104237.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080212/021104237.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Acacia is a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/search.php?site=&#038;q=acacia&#038;tid=&#038;aid=&#038;searchin=stories">well known</a> patent hoarder, who buys up or licenses various unused patents and sets up <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071127/015820.shtml">subsidiaries</a> who do nothing but sue companies in the market who actually make products.  The latest Acacia lawsuit has been <a href="http://trolltracker.blogspot.com/2008/02/acacia-sues-apple-over-itunes-in-east.html" target="_new">filed against Apple for the "allowance" feature in iTunes</a> that allows someone to transfer a dollar amount of iTunes credit to someone else -- effectively allowing a parent with a credit card to issue some "allowance" for a kid to purchase iTunes.  You would think that such a concept wouldn't be patentable, given the history of parents giving kids an allowance -- but apparently the folks working in the patent office never received allowances as kids.  The <a href="http://www.google.com/patents?id=rUJ9AAAAEBAJ&#038;dq=7,143,064">patent itself</a> seems rather straightforward, but it's difficult to understand why such a thing is patentable in the first place.  In the Teleflex v. KSR ruling the Supreme Court noted that the patent office shouldn't just approve patents on <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070430/100114.shtml">combining</a> obvious ideas.  Mixing the internet with allowances would seem to fall into that camp, though this patent was issued prior to the Supreme Court ruling.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080212/021104237.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080212/021104237.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080212/021104237.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>giving-allowance-isn't-prior-art?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080212/021104237</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>