<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;airport&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:13:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Loaded Gun Falls Out Of Checked Bag. Feeling Secure At Airports Yet?</title>
<dc:creator>Timothy Geigner</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111024/10294616491/loaded-gun-falls-out-checked-bag-feeling-secure-airports-yet.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111024/10294616491/loaded-gun-falls-out-checked-bag-feeling-secure-airports-yet.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It's always fun for me when Techdirt has stories about the TSA, but perhaps not for the same reasons as everyone else here. By that, I mean that the range of reaction to such stories always strikes me as incredibly varied. Get a story about the TSA working with the cosmopolitan state of Tennessee to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111020/11465616440/tsa-decides-terrorists-must-be-driving-partners-with-tenn-law-enforcement-to-randomly-search-vehicles.shtml">check drivers</a> for whatever it is they check for, and you'll get serious responses about our civil liberties being eroded. Write about&nbsp;these all-world defenders of truth and justice laying the smackdown on a possible-terrorist but confirmed breast cancer survivor and her <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111003/12305416186/tsa-force-breast-cancer-patient-to-submit-to-patdown-refuse-to-let-her-show-id-card-about-implants.shtml">mammory implants</a>, and truly flabbergasted readers will demand action from our politicians. Relate the words of the guy that <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110913/10465415931/guy-who-created-tsa-says-its-failed-its-time-to-dismantle-it.shtml">created the TSA</a> to begin with and his apprehension about where the agency has gone in its off-broadway tour of security theatre, and you'll even get some folks defending the TSA in the comments. These are all well and good, true opinions and feelings from either side; the stirring of a wonderful national debate. <br /><br />
Me? I just like to laugh. And no one has made me laugh lately like the TSA. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/profile.php?u=gumnos">Gumnos</a> alerts us (without a patdown, no less) to&nbsp;a USA Today&nbsp;story of how LAX's airport security is trying to <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondeadline/post/2011/10/tsa-misses-loaded-gun-in-bag-at-lax/1?csp=34news">define ironic comedy</a>. At least, that's what I assume they're doing, because otherwise it means that some of their people may be in need of an IQ test. Look, no security is perfect. Something is going to sneak through occasionally. And we've been told the terrorists are creative, hiding exposives in their shoes (laces out, Dan), their underwear (I'm assuming they have to go with tighty-whities here, right? Or else everything would just kind of fall out?), and we've been told that the clearly deep-thinking and well-funded terrorist networks around the world are looking into hiding a multi-megaton nuclear warhead in a hair bonnet. 
<br /><br />
But what you don't expect to encounter is what happened at LAX. And that's for a loaded .38 caliber pistol to kind of just fall out of a passenger's&nbsp;duffel bag as it was being&nbsp;loaded <i>onto the plane</i>. Now, to be fair, the TSA promptly and proudly announced that it isn't their duty to screen anything but carryon luggage, as if this was some kind of a win for them. But all that makes me wonder is why a federal agency in charge of ensuring safe transportation is more concerned with slapping around our meaty bits than, oh I don't know, checking the damned luggage that goes on the plane! Again, this is <i>not</i> carryon luggage, but rather checked luggage. But how does it make any sense to parse out different sets of luggage to be checked by different agencies with potentially different equipment and...You know what? I'm not going to try to make sense of this for fear of a complete mental breakdown.<br /><br />
Still, I'm all about the positivity, which is why I pictured myself standing in line, waiting to board the plane (why am I always in Group D, damn it?) and watching the baggage handlers out the window lovingly slam my stuff into the luggage compartment, when a loaded .38 pistol comes spinning out of the bag and lands on the tarmac. After a moment of watching the handlers stare dumbly at each other for a moment, I burst out laughing, pointing at the gun, then back at the airline employees, then off in the distance where some TSA agent is playing puppet with a 98 year old triple amputee (try figuring <i>that&nbsp;</i>one out), then back at the gun. Rinse, repeat. Rinse, repeat. <br /><br />
So take a moment to thank the TSA for all the laughs.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111024/10294616491/loaded-gun-falls-out-checked-bag-feeling-secure-airports-yet.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111024/10294616491/loaded-gun-falls-out-checked-bag-feeling-secure-airports-yet.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111024/10294616491/loaded-gun-falls-out-checked-bag-feeling-secure-airports-yet.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>grope-grope-grope</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111024/10294616491</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:49:19 PDT</pubDate>
<title>ICE Redefines Detainment For Wikileaks Helper: You're Not Being Detained, You Just Can't Leave</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110412/01593813862/ice-redefines-detainment-wikileaks-helper-youre-not-being-detained-you-just-cant-leave.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110412/01593813862/ice-redefines-detainment-wikileaks-helper-youre-not-being-detained-you-just-cant-leave.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Earlier this year, we wrote about computer security expert, Tor developer and Wikileaks volunteer Jacob Appelbaum, who was regularly <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110112/16054412641/customs-hamfisted-attempts-to-intimidate-wikileaks-volunteers.shtml">being detained and intimidated</a> by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials each time he (a US citizen) traveled into the country.  If you follow Jacob's <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/ioerror" target="_blank">Twitter feed</a>, you get detailed descriptions each time he flies back into the country of the hassles he has to go through.  Every time he's detained and never once given an explanation for why or what is being searched for.  He's often lied to and frequently told that it's a "random" search.  He certainly knows enough that he wipes all of his electronic equipment before traveling across the border.
<br><br>
In the latest case, upon returning from a conference in Europe by flying into Houston, Appelbaum again asked his detainers why he was being detained, and was once again not given a straight answer.  He knows that there's something on the screen that they pull up on their computers, but they refuse to provide him with any info.  This time, they even went so far as to redefine detainment, telling him <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/ioerror/status/57718552840511488" target="_blank">that he wasn't being detained, but that he just couldn't go until they were done with him</a>.  Perhaps he should send Homeland Security a copy of a dictionary with the definition of "detained" highlighted.
<br><br>
Of course, this is also the same Jacob Appelbaum whom the US government has been secretly requesting information on from various online service providers, as the US government seeks to make its case against Wikileaks.  Is it really so difficult for the US government to be upfront with Appelbaum about why he's being detained?  Is it really a matter of national security that they can't say "hey, look, the Justice Department is frantically trying to find something -- anything -- that can be used in a case against Wikileaks, and we're coming up blank, so we're going to search your computer equipment based on nothing, just in case you might have something in there that we can use to prosecute Julian Assange."<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110412/01593813862/ice-redefines-detainment-wikileaks-helper-youre-not-being-detained-you-just-cant-leave.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110412/01593813862/ice-redefines-detainment-wikileaks-helper-youre-not-being-detained-you-just-cant-leave.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110412/01593813862/ice-redefines-detainment-wikileaks-helper-youre-not-being-detained-you-just-cant-leave.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>our-government-at-work</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110412/01593813862</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>