<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories filed under &quot;accessories&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:46:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Teenage Engineering: If Our Parts Are Too Expensive, Here's How To Print Your Own</title>
<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121002/04025320568/teenage-engineering-if-our-parts-are-too-expensive-heres-how-to-print-your-own.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121002/04025320568/teenage-engineering-if-our-parts-are-too-expensive-heres-how-to-print-your-own.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>There's plenty of breathless writing about the imminent 3D-printing revolution, but realistically, what is it likely to mean for most people?  They probably won't all be printing out their own <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120904/08161520265/does-idea-open-source-planes-really-fly.shtml">planes</a>, but they may well be printing out small replacement parts for goods they own.  <a href="http://www.shapeways.com/blog/archives/1647-Teenage-Engineering-Make-CAD-Files-Available-to-3D-Print-Replacement-Parts.html">Here's an early example of that from the world of electronics</a>, spotted by the Shapeways site:

<i><blockquote>Teenage Engineering not only make one of the sexiest synthesizers but also get the prize for being the first electronics company to offer their replacement parts as downloadable 3D Printed files.</blockquote></i>

<a href="http://now.teenageengineering.com/op-1-accessories-cad-files">Teenage Engineering's explanation for the move</a> is as follows:

<i><blockquote>We work hard to make our OP-1 [synthesizer] users happy with free OS updates and added functionality. But sometimes we fail. As some have noted, the shipping cost of the OP-1 accessories is very high. This is because we can't find a good delivery service for small items. Meanwhile, we have decided to put all CAD files of the parts in our library section for you to download. The files are provided in both STEP and STL format. Just download the files and 3D print as many as you want.</blockquote></i>

Worth noting that this is about serving customers by helping them avoid high shipping costs -- not something every company cares about. Notice, too, that Teenage Engineering explicitly encourages people to print as many replacement parts as they want -- no attempt to limit this to "one-offs" through stupid licensing agreements, for example.
</p><p>
Of course, that's exactly as it should be -- but too often isn't.  However, it's also a shrewd move.  It means that customers are likely to use their synthesizers for longer, and to become more attached to them.  Building customer loyalty in this way is likely to turn them into good ambassadors for the company, and makes the next sale more likely, so Teenage Engineering's generosity is also good business.  Similarly, making the CAD files available encourages users to modify and customize the parts, again building loyalty to the brand, and enriching the ecosystem that grows up around the product.
</p><p>
It would be surprising if this kind of approach did not become more widespread among manufacturers of many categories of goods, given the clear advantages it offers.  It's not quite as exciting as printing out a car or a plane, but is a practical application of 3D printers that might well help drive their wider use thanks to the direct, everyday savings they can bring.
</p><p>
Follow me @glynmoody on <a href="http://twitter.com/glynmoody">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://identi.ca/glynmoody">identi.ca</a>, and on <a href="https://plus.google.com/100647702320088380533">Google+</a></p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121002/04025320568/teenage-engineering-if-our-parts-are-too-expensive-heres-how-to-print-your-own.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121002/04025320568/teenage-engineering-if-our-parts-are-too-expensive-heres-how-to-print-your-own.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121002/04025320568/teenage-engineering-if-our-parts-are-too-expensive-heres-how-to-print-your-own.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>think-small</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121002/04025320568</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 03:03:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>New iPhone Connector Port Revealed, Thus Wiping Out Several Generations Of Accessories In One Fell Swoop</title>
<dc:creator>Leigh Beadon</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120621/19013019422/apple-reveals-new-iphone-connector-port-thus-wiping-out-several-generations-accessories-one-fell-swoop.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120621/19013019422/apple-reveals-new-iphone-connector-port-thus-wiping-out-several-generations-accessories-one-fell-swoop.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><em><strong>Clarification:</strong> As some people have pointed out, Apple themselves have not revealed this&mdash;the information comes from TechCrunch's conversations with accessory manufacturers. The headline was misleading and has been updated.</em></p>

<p>As iPhones and iPads have gotten more powerful, they've been adopted for a lot of professional applications, and this has spawned a huge industry of compatible devices&mdash;not just accessories, but significant expansions that can run into the same price range as the iPhone/iPad itself. In music, for example, there are <a href="http://www.numark.com/product/mixdeck" target="_blank">DJ controllers</a>, <a href="http://www.studiosixdigital.com/iaudiointerface2/" target="_blank">audio interfaces</a>, <a href="http://apogeedigital.com/products/mic.php" target="_blank">studio microphones</a>, <a href="http://store.griffintechnology.com/stompbox" target="_blank">stompbox pedals</a> and more&mdash;all utilizing the ubiquitous iPod/iPhone/iPad connector port that has remained the same for years. But now TechCrunch has confirmed that <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/06/20/confirmed-the-new-iphone-will-have-a-19-pin-mini-connector/" target="_blank">the new iPhone will feature a new mini connector with a yet-to-be-announced standard</a>&mdash;which means the rest of the Apple line is sure to follow, and all those products are officially on the road to obsolescence.</p>

<blockquote><em>Apple&#8217;s 30-pin ports have been the standard since Apple released the third generation iPod. The connectors offered structural stability when connecting to most accessories but it&#8217;s clear &#8211; especially with the introduction of the MagSafe 2 port &#8211; Apple is more concerned with space savings inside each device.
<br /><br />
Three independent manufacturers all agreed that the 19-pin dock port is in the works and many accessory manufacturers are facing an uneasy few months as they wait for official news of the standard to be announced.</em></blockquote>

<p>This is going to frustrate a lot of users&mdash;but despite TechCrunch's suggestion, most manufacturers probably aren't "uneasy". For them, it's a great cash-grab, and an apparently pointless one. Sometimes things have to become obsolete&mdash;but this doesn't seem like one of those cases. There were no problems with the old connectors, and they weren't causing any kind of technological bottleneck, so apart from the space-saving aspect, there doesn't seem to be much to gain&mdash;certainly not for the user, and certainly not compared to what's lost by abandoning such a well-established standard. This has led some to suggest that the accessory manufacturers were in fact <a href="http://www.awesome-robo.com/2012/06/apple-iphone-5-19-pin-scheme.html" target="_blank">the driving force behind the change</a>:</p>

<blockquote><em>Have you guys ever heard of 'planned obsolescence?' It's a practice which encourages planning and designing a product so it's only useful for a limited time, before becoming obsolete. It's common practice, and used by many companies to create demand for the 'newer, better' model of the product. Yet this move is possibly prompted by the major accessory makers facing dwindling sales, as customers see no need to buy new accessories for a smartphone that had a universal dock system for 6 generations. What most tech blogs failed to address was the following question: Did the top accessory makers pad Apple's pockets, or hardball negotiate for an incentive to drop the standard cable as a means of forcing consumers to buy new accessories? We're inclined to think so.
<br /><br />
Considering that three of the top accessory makers have been the first to confirm that they're working on 19 pin accessories already for the launch of the iPhone 5, the motive is simple : Greed. And why not? It's a fail safe business plan, designed to shake out the smaller accessory makers with tons of unsold '30 pin' stock and a good amount of people will probably conform to this odd decision without question.</em></blockquote> 

<p>Of course, Apple gets plenty of benefits too. The new connector will be yet another proprietary standard, following their typical walled-garden approach, which means most accessory developers will build Apple-first, everything-else-second-if-at-all, thus pushing more people towards Apple products. It's not surprising, but it's not a consumer-friendly decision either. Additionally, manufacturers/owners of some of the aforementioned professional accessories to do with music and photography get the worst deal&mdash;for them, iPhone/iPad compatibility is a great feature, but not central to their businesses/buying habits. Breaking the compatibility is a source of nothing but frustration, and will probably discourage a lot of such users from upgrading at all&mdash;while the manufacturers are slowly forced to leave them behind.</p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120621/19013019422/apple-reveals-new-iphone-connector-port-thus-wiping-out-several-generations-accessories-one-fell-swoop.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120621/19013019422/apple-reveals-new-iphone-connector-port-thus-wiping-out-several-generations-accessories-one-fell-swoop.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120621/19013019422/apple-reveals-new-iphone-connector-port-thus-wiping-out-several-generations-accessories-one-fell-swoop.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>planned-obsolesence</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120621/19013019422</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>