<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;toshiba&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:28:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Toshiba: You Can't Have Repair Manuals Because They're Copyrighted And You're Too Dumb To Fix A Computer</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121110/22403121007/toshiba-you-cant-have-repair-manuals-because-theyre-copyrighted-youre-too-dumb-to-fix-computer.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121110/22403121007/toshiba-you-cant-have-repair-manuals-because-theyre-copyrighted-youre-too-dumb-to-fix-computer.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Many years ago, one of the absolute worst customer experiences I ever had concerned a Toshiba laptop that never worked properly -- which was followed by ridiculous and rude service.  Eventually, using the famous <a href="http://consumerist.com/2007/05/11/how-to-launch-an-executive-email-carpet-bomb/" target="_blank">Consumerist Executive Email Carpet Bomb</a> process, I was able to get things sorted out (and, despite them asking me to sign an NDA, when I sent it back crossed out the exec called me and said it was fine and that I was allowed to talk about the situation).  Since then, however, I've stayed away from Toshiba laptops entirely.  But having had that experience, somehow it doesn't surprise me that, among the major laptop makers, Toshiba would be the one <a href="http://www.tim.id.au/blog/2012/11/10/toshiba-laptop-service-manuals-and-the-sorry-state-of-copyright-law/" target="_blank">using copyright law to try to hide its service repair manuals</a> (story found <a href="http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/12/11/10/1334221/toshiba-pursues-copyright-claim-against-laptop-manual-site?utm_source=slashdot&#038;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank">via Slashdot</a>).
<br /><br />
The situation involves an Australian site called <a href="http://www.tim.id.au/blog/tims-laptop-service-manuals/" target="_blank">Tim's Laptop Service Manuals</a>, which provides exactly what it says it does.  Well, until Toshiba's clueless lawyers got involved.  Toshiba gave Tim a list of excuses for why he needed to take their service manuals down -- most of which made little sense.  At the end of the list was basically "we hold the copyright and thus you need to take them down."  Legally, they're probably right.  But, this is just one of those cases where it's <i>stupid</i> to apply copyright law.  It's not as though Toshiba needed copyright as the incentive to produce these manuals.  No, the only reason to assert copyright here is to try to limit repairs to authorized dealers, which limits the usefulness of their products to the public.  In a sane world, this would be a case of copyright misuse.  But, when it comes to copyright, we don't live in a sane world.
<br /><br />
The other excuses Toshiba gave are pretty silly and seem to revolve around the idea that ordinary Toshiba customers are complete morons who should never try to repair their own computer because it might blow up in their face or something.  Tim's response is a good one, noting that none of the other major laptop makers seem to have this problem.  So, either Toshiba makes crazy-dangerous laptops... or, they're just trying to protect dealer/repair shop revenue.  It's likely the latter.
<blockquote><i>
My place of employment puts a massive emphasis on health and safety in the workplace, a policy I am 100% in support of. Safety is an incredibly important issue, and I applaud Toshiba for taking it into consideration, but I think they are a little misguided. I have personally never been injured or visibly endangered by working on any kind of computer system, much less a consumer notebook computer. I have also never heard of anybody else being injured by working on one. While I do understand the drive behind any concern for safety, the reality is that there appears to be no risk to the well-being of myself or any of my readers by providing repair manuals free to download, and so I do not understand Toshiba&#8217;s cause for concern here.
<br /><br />
It is worth noting that Dell, HP and Lenovo provide service manuals for all of their laptop computers for download, free of charge or registration or membership of any kind, on their various support websites, which would indicate that none of these companies share Toshiba&#8217;s concern in this regard. I would not seriously take this to mean that Toshiba laptops are inherently more dangerous to service than laptops of other brands, thus causing them to discourage unqualified persons from doing so, but drawing on my own knowledge and experience I cannot see what risk they are attempting to mitigate here.
</i></blockquote>
In the end, it seems like this is the kind of thing some lawyer thought was a good idea... "because copyright."  You get this with copyright maximalists sometimes, where they think that because a copyright exists, you <i>must</i> exclude people -- even if it makes little economic sense.  While I'm already not interested in buying a Toshiba computer, it would seem that this little stunt should scare many others away from purchasing their laptops.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121110/22403121007/toshiba-you-cant-have-repair-manuals-because-theyre-copyrighted-youre-too-dumb-to-fix-computer.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121110/22403121007/toshiba-you-cant-have-repair-manuals-because-theyre-copyrighted-youre-too-dumb-to-fix-computer.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121110/22403121007/toshiba-you-cant-have-repair-manuals-because-theyre-copyrighted-youre-too-dumb-to-fix-computer.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>buy-elsewhere</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121110/22403121007</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 May 2012 22:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>SGI Back From The Dead (Again) And Suing Tons Of Companies For Patent Infringement</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/02113518553/sgi-back-dead-again-suing-tons-companies-patent-infringement.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/02113518553/sgi-back-dead-again-suing-tons-companies-patent-infringement.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Back when I moved to Silicon Valley, Silicon Graphics Inc., (SGI) was still a hot place to work.  They were still pumping out cool machines and had a reputation for a fun corporate culture.  Of course, that collapsed pretty quickly over the next few years, as SGI totally misjudged the market trends and fell victim to the innovator's dilemma.  Basically, SGI never could come to terms with the fact that its premium products were going to be increasingly undercut as cheaper commodity technology improved.  Back in 2006, we noted that what remained of SGI had indicated that it planned to resurrect the company by <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061024/174559.shtml">going patent troll</a>.  However, we <i>thought</i> we'd avoided that ignoble result when SGI <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090401/1502474343.shtml">sold most of its assets</a> to Rackable for a mere $25 million three years ago.  Silly us for assuming those patents would just go away.
<br /><br />
While Rackable changed its name to Silicon Graphics International... the original company actually <i>retained</i> the patents, and renamed itself Graphics Properties Holdings... and over the last few years has <a href="http://www.m-cam.com/patently-obvious/hand-grave-intellectual-property-analysis-graphics-properties-holdings" target="_blank">been suing lots of companies for patent infringement</a>.  In the last year alone it has sued Apple, HTC, LG, RIM, Samsung, Sony, Acer, ASUS, Panasonic, Sharp, Toshiba, Vizio and Motorola Mobility.
<br /><br />
As the link above notes, while some of GPH's patents are relatively early, it appears that lots of similar inventions predated key patents.  However, the early date may make those patents look stronger, and give GPH much more leverage in getting companies to pay up -- or risk losing the ability to produce devices with nice graphics capabilities.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/02113518553/sgi-back-dead-again-suing-tons-companies-patent-infringement.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/02113518553/sgi-back-dead-again-suing-tons-companies-patent-infringement.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/02113518553/sgi-back-dead-again-suing-tons-companies-patent-infringement.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>troll-troll-troll-troll</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120419/02113518553</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:10:11 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Hard Drive For Border Crossings: Will Self-Destruct If Connected To An Unknown Host</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110418/23105713950/hard-drive-border-crossings-will-self-destruct-if-connected-to-unknown-host.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110418/23105713950/hard-drive-border-crossings-will-self-destruct-if-connected-to-unknown-host.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've discussed a few times how Homeland Security has aggressively (and successfully) claimed the right to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110404/16142013775/once-again-court-says-homeland-security-is-free-to-seize-search-your-computer-without-warrant-border.shtml">search laptop harddrives</a> at the border without probable cause (sometimes without any known cause).  The response from some has been to now encrypt your drive, but it appears that technologists are trying to offer up a variety of other solutions.  <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/user/ronalddumsfeld">Dark Helmet</a> points us to the news that Toshiba is now offering a hard drive that can <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/225202/toshibas_new_selferasing_hard_drives_the_ultimate_in_data_security.html" target="_blank">delete itself if it's connected to an "unknown host."</a>  It can also take less extreme measures, including just ramping up the authentication needed.  While being pitched as useful for governments, it seems like it can be useful to protect against governments as well.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110418/23105713950/hard-drive-border-crossings-will-self-destruct-if-connected-to-unknown-host.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110418/23105713950/hard-drive-border-crossings-will-self-destruct-if-connected-to-unknown-host.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110418/23105713950/hard-drive-border-crossings-will-self-destruct-if-connected-to-unknown-host.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>well-there's-an-idea</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110418/23105713950</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Jan 2010 14:52:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>CyberSitter Sues The Chinese Government (In Los Angeles) Over Green Dam Filters</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100106/0142117627.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100106/0142117627.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last summer, of course, there was a lot of attention paid to China's announced plans that every PC sold in China needed to include the new "Green Dam Youth Escort" software, which was a client-side filtering program.  After international outrage over the plan actually had some sort of impact, the government backed down.  A smaller story, that came out during all of this, was that the Green Dam software appeared to copy significant portions of the commercial filter product, CyberSitter.  Now, CyberSitter <a href="http://www.forbes.com/feeds/businesswire/2010/01/05/businesswire133595754.html" target="_blank">has sued the Chinese government and a bunch of companies for $2.2 billion</a>.  The lawsuit has been filed in Los Angeles, and I would wonder what jurisdiction a Los Angeles district court has over the Chinese government concerning software that was only to be used in China.
<br /><br />
While the lawsuit does include the expected copyright claim, it also goes much further to claim trade secret violations and "conspiracy."  And while the Chinese government is obviously the headline grabber, it also includes Sony, Lenovo, Toshiba, Acer, ASUSTek, BenQ and Haier, claiming that these computer makers were in on the conspiracy.  While many of those have US operations, it seems like a longshot that (a) the court has jurisdiction over their actions in China or (b) the charge of "conspiracy" has any chance of sticking.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100106/0142117627.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100106/0142117627.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100106/0142117627.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>good-luck-with-that</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100106/0142117627</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:56:26 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Can't Innovate? Litigate! 3Com Goes Patent Lawsuit Ballistic</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091013/1901346515.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091013/1901346515.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Remember back when 3Com was a big innovative company coming up with interesting new products?  What happened since then?  Well, as we've seen over and over again, once a company runs into trouble continuing to innovate, its last ditch effort to stay in business is to start suing everyone for patent infringement.  Step up to the plate, 3Com.  The company set up a subsidiary specifically for suing other companies for patent infringement and <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/newsletters/lans/2009/101209lan1.html?fsrc=netflash-rss" target="_new">just sued Acer, Apple, Asus, Dell, Fujitsu, Gateway, HP, Sony, and Toshiba</a>.  Oh, and take a guess where this "subsidiary" set up shop?  East Texas... of course.  All the better to file patent lawsuits apparently...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091013/1901346515.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091013/1901346515.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091013/1901346515.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>ghosts-of-companies-past</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091013/1901346515</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:25:58 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Columbia Professor Latest To Go On The Patent Offensive</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080321/162722617.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080321/162722617.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Over the last year or so, we've seen two disturbing trends in enforcing patents.  The first, is seeing patent holders <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20071130/010512.shtml">suing a bunch of companies at once</a> rather than just one or two, as used to be standard.  They do this because they fear that some type of patent reform is coming, either via Congress or the courts.  So they want to get as many patent suits in as quickly as possible.  The second trend is that, rather than taking patent infringement cases through the court system (which is bound by the recent precedents set by the Supreme Court that loosen patent rules), they use a loophole: taking patent infringement claims <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070601/090232.shtml">to the US International Trade Commission (ITC)</a>.  The ITC has the authority, if it believes that infringement occurs, to block the import of infringing goods.  The ITC doesn't need to pay attention to what the courts say, and doesn't need to wait for the USPTO to review a patent.  It can simply decide infringement occurred and ban the import of the goods.  This is, effectively, the equivalent of an injunction against the product (just the sort of thing the Supreme Court said should be used more <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060515/118257.shtml">cautiously</a>).
<br /><br />
A Columbia professor has now picked up on both of these trends, <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9900659-7.html?tag=nefd.top" target="_new">getting the ITC to investigate 30 companies</a> for violating her patents on LED and laser technologies.  Among the companies investigated: Sony, LG Electronics, Hitachi, Toshiba, Panasonic, Motorola, Nokia, Pioneer, and Samsung.  Whether or not these patents turn out to be valid, it's a cheap tactic to use the ITC rather than going to the courts to fight this battle.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080321/162722617.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080321/162722617.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080321/162722617.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>very-offensive</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080321/162722617</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:12:32 PST</pubDate>
<title>HD DVD May Finally Be Dead... Only Three Years Too Late</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080217/193456272.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080217/193456272.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A few weeks ago, when we noted that it really looked like HD DVD might <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080129/194812119.shtml">finally be done for</a>, we were surprised to see the number of folks in the comments insisting that we were crazy, and HD DVD had a long future ahead of it.  Well, it appears that future has been cut short.  In the past week, <a href="http://www.usnews.com/blogs/daves-download/2008/2/12/netflix-abandons-hd-dvd-in-favor-of-blu-ray.html">Netflix</a>, <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9869591-7.html?tag=nefd.top">Best Buy</a> and <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7248128.stm">Wal-Mart</a> all said they would sell exclusively Blu-ray players and discs going forward, squeezing out whatever last minute hope there was of rescuing HD DVD.  Now reports are finally coming out that <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9873848-7.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" target="_new">Toshiba has come to terms with the inevitable</a> and will officially kill off HD DVD in the next week or so.  The thing is, this is really <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050823/1146255_F.shtml">three years too late</a>.  There were three years where a next generation DVD standard had an open market to dominate.  Yet, in those three years, the ability to deliver videos online has grown tremendously, meaning that there's even less of a reason today to upgrade than in the past.  No, internet delivery of movie content isn't ideal yet.  It's still much easier to use a disc -- but the gap has closed quite a bit and it's only going to get narrower -- until internet delivery systems surpass any kind of disc-based system.  It's a classic "innovator's dilemma" where internet delivery mechanisms are getting better at a rate much faster than next generation DVD systems.  Those three years of fighting over standards is going to come back and bite everyone who spent all this time fighting over a standard only to miss the larger picture.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080217/193456272.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080217/193456272.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080217/193456272.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>still-time-to-salvage?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080217/193456272</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:59:49 PST</pubDate>
<title>HD DVD Bets Big On Super Bowl Ad... Yeah, That'll Do It</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080129/194812119.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080129/194812119.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ In the biggest standards battle most people <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050823/1146255_F.shtml">couldn't care less</a> about, most folks are assuming that Blu-ray has finally won the battle.  However, the HD DVD folks aren't totally giving up yet.  After hanging their heads and canceling a party and press conference at CES, it appears that Toshiba believes the way to revive interest in the HD DVD standard is... <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20080129/hd-dvd/" target="_new">to spend $2.7 million on a Superbowl ad</a>.  As if that's going to make a difference.  It brings to mind various dot com startups from the last bubble who put their entire marketing budget into a Super Bowl ad.  In the meantime, it may be time to start watching HD DVD's other backers.  Microsoft still insists it's strongly behind HD DVD but have <a href="http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3165627">opened the door</a> to finally giving it up.  Meanwhile, Intel has a long history of <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050418/114204_F.shtml">jumping ship</a> after it realizes it backed the wrong horse in various standards battles.  The company seems to have learned when to cash out and move on.  Last year it moved closer to that position by supporting both standards (while still officially backing HD DVD).  If the trend keeps moving towards Blu-ray, then expect to see Intel jump more fully to the other camp.  Now, if only this had been worked out four years ago, before people had moved on to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080115/150039.shtml">online video</a>.  Blu-ray can still do well, but it missed its biggest opportunity to take over the market a few years ago.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080129/194812119.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080129/194812119.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080129/194812119.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>great-moments-in-wasting-money</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080129/194812119</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:32:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Playlist Patented... Everyone Sued... But Did Apple Pay Up?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/172809.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/172809.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A bunch of folks have been submitting the latest story on a patent hoarding firm, Premier International Associates, who appears to have absolutely no other business than getting its hands on questionable, overly broad, obvious patents and then suing everyone possible.  In this case, the patent is for the basic concept of a <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&#038;Sect2=HITOFF&#038;d=PALL&#038;p=1&#038;u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&#038;r=1&#038;f=G&#038;l=50&#038;s1=6,243,725.PN.&#038;OS=PN/6,243,725&#038;RS=PN/6,243,725">playlist</a>, which can be found just about anywhere.  So, it should come as little to no surprise that the list of companies sued is quite long, including: <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=42336">Microsoft, Verizon, AT&#038;T, Sprint, Dell, Lenovo, Toshiba, Viacom, Real, Napster, Samsung, LG, Motorola, Nokia, Sandisk, HP, Acer, Gateway and Yahoo</a> (phew!).  That's quite a list, though it's not surprising to see that there are a ton of companies offering software that has a concept so basic and so obvious as a playlist.
<br /><br />
However, there is one very interesting point here.  Apple is missing from the list.  As the folks over at Ars Technica figured out, Premier actually had sued Apple about this same patent back in 2005, but at the same time it was filing all these new patent lawsuits it <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070914-company-patents-playlists-sues-everyone.html">filed to dismiss the Apple suit</a>, suggesting that Apple most likely paid off the company (perhaps giving it the money needed to suddenly sue every other company in the universe.  Apple certainly has a history of doing this.  When the company was <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060515/2152218.shtml">sued</a> on a rather similar obvious patent on a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20051208/132218.shtml">hierarchical menu-based user interfaces</a> held by Creative, it eventually (after spending some time fighting it) decided to simply <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060823/152436.shtml">pay $100 million</a> to be left alone.  Of course, all that did was allow Creative to head out and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060830/155328.shtml">sue plenty of others</a>.  Sound familiar?  By settling on these questionable patent claims, all Apple is doing is encouraging more lawsuits of this nature for itself, as well as others.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/172809.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/172809.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070914/172809.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>sounds-like-it</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20070914/172809</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:10:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>74 Percent Of Nothing Is Still Nothing</title>
<dc:creator>Carlo Longino</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070712/212900.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070712/212900.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The group behind the HD DVD format in Europe claims that it has <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/12/european-hd-dvd-lobbyists-claim-74-percent-market-share/">74 percent market share</a> of the next-gen DVD market in a handful of western European countries. Of course, they're not including Sony PS3s, which have a Blu-ray drive, in their count, but the bigger point is that they're claiming 74 percent of a miniscule market. This contrived stat, like Toshiba's <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070613/100024.shtml">claim of 60 percent share</a> of the US market, glosses over the problems that are holding it back: DRM that <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070705/212125.shtml">breaks legitimate customers' players</a>, low perceived benefits and high prices. Apparently, though, the HD DVD folks would rather claim to have a big share of a tiny market than to have any share in a market that's actually meaningful. <b>Update:</b> Just in case anybody cares, the Blu-ray people say <a href="http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/134278480/">they're actually the market leaders</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070712/212900.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070712/212900.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070712/212900.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>hot-air</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20070712/212900</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>