<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;tele2&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:18:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>More Swedish ISPs Decide To Keep No Logs To Protect Users</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090429/0207004690.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090429/0207004690.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We recently noted that a Swedish ISP was advertising the fact that it <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090416/1744494531.shtml">doesn't keep log files</a> of its users, following the newly implemented Swedish law, IPRED, that requires ISPs to hand over log files if users are accused of copyright infringement online.  It appears that the attention generated by that one ISP has now lead multiple Swedish ISPs to <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10229618-93.html?part=rss&#038;subj=news&#038;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" target="_new">also promise to delete all user data</a>, so that there would be nothing to turn over.  As a representative from Tele2 noted: "It's a strong wish from our customers, so we decided not to store information on customers' IP numbers anymore."  Between this and the new <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090405/1335514389.shtml">interest</a> in encryption and VPN software in Sweden, you have to wonder why the entertainment industry was so excited about the IPRED law passing in the first place.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090429/0207004690.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090429/0207004690.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090429/0207004690.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>consumer-demand...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090429/0207004690</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:15:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Danish ISP Blocks The Pirate Bay; But Is It For Legal Reasons... Or Competitive?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090120/1919463467.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090120/1919463467.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ A year ago, recording industry lobbying group IFPI successfully convinced a Danish court to force ISP Tele2 to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml">block The Pirate Bay</a>.  This came after a similar ruling that forced Tele2 to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061026/161240.shtml">block</a> access to AllofMp3 (which, you'll recall was the big "threat" prior to The Pirate Bay).  Of course, these blocks don't work particularly well, and seem incredibly annoying for those content creators who actually <i>want</i> their content distributed through systems like The Pirate Bay.
<br /><br />
Tele2 appealed the ruling, and another court found that, indeed, ISPs should be forced to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml">block</a> access to The Pirate Bay.  While that case is being appealed to the country's Supreme Court, it appears that other ISPs are being pressured to start blocking as well.  Denmark's largest ISP, TDC, <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/largest-danish-isps-blocks-the-pirate-bay-090119/" target="_new">is now blocking access to The Pirate Bay</a>.
<br /><br />
Torrentfreak suggests that TDC is worried about a similar lawsuit, and did this as a preventative measure, but I have to wonder if some of the thinking is competitive.  Last April, TDC announced a deal whereby its customers could <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS193808+31-Mar-2008+BW20080331">download unlimited music</a>... though it was really more of a <a href="http://www.mediafuturist.com/2008/04/danish-telecom.html">subscription rental service</a> that included DRM.  So, basically, here's a way that TDC gets to block out a "competitor" to its own service, and then blame the legal rulings for being able to do so...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090120/1919463467.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090120/1919463467.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090120/1919463467.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>legal-excuses</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090120/1919463467</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:06:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Danish High Court Says ISPs Must Be Internet Policemen; Have To Block The Pirate Bay</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081126/0909552961.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081126/0909552961.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Earlier this year, we noted, with surprise, that a Danish court had <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml">ordered</a> Tele2, a large ISP, to block all access to The Pirate Bay website.  This followed an earlier ruling requiring Tele2 to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061026/161240.shtml">block access to AllofMp3.com</a>.  It's never been clear why an ISP should take on the responsibility of blocking access to a site, and Tele2 <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080206/165610190.shtml">appealed</a> the ruling.  Unfortunately, it looks as though the company has lost.  The Danish High Court has apparently <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/isp-must-continue-to-block-the-pirate-bay-081126/" target="_new">sided with the IFPI, and says that, indeed, Tele2 must block The Pirate Bay</a>.  Of course, this is unlikely to matter.  Whenever these blocks are ordered, there are always ways around them, and the attention from the blocks tends to alert more people to the site's existence.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081126/0909552961.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081126/0909552961.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081126/0909552961.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>keep-on-blocking</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20081126/0909552961</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:31:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Danish Block Of The Pirate Bay Leads To Even More Traffic</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080211/031224223.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080211/031224223.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We've noted in the past that every time the RIAA or the IFPI scores a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060915/005658.shtml">"significant blow"</a> against an operation they accuse of piracy, it only seems to drive <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061101/123127.shtml">more</a> attention to those sites.  That appears to be happening once again.  Since the IFPI convinced a Danish court to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml">block users</a> from accessing the Pirate Bay, traffic from Denmark to the Pirate Bay <a href="http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=1659" target="_new">has actually increased</a>, thanks mainly to the news coverage of the story.  So, for such a significant blow, it appears that all the IFPI has succeeded in doing is providing free advertising for the Pirate Bay.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080211/031224223.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080211/031224223.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080211/031224223.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>nice-publicity-stunt,-IFPI</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080211/031224223</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2008 22:02:28 PST</pubDate>
<title>Danish ISP Doesn't Understand Why It's Supposed To Block Pirate Bay</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080206/165610190.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080206/165610190.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Earlier this week, we noted that a Danish court had told ISP Tele2 that it needed to start <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml">blocking access</a> to the Pirate Bay.  Last year, a court had also ordered Tele2 to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061026/161240.shtml">block access</a> to AllofMp3.com.  Tele2 complied with that first order, though apparently it was quite easy to get around the block (no surprise there).  However, apparently sensing the outrage being felt concerning these blocks, Tele2 is <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,142223-pg,1/article.html" target="_new">considering fighting back against the order</a> (with support from other ISPs).  The company claims that it needs "clarification" on the ruling, though doesn't seem to provide much more detail than that at this point.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080206/165610190.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080206/165610190.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080206/165610190.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>fighting-it</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080206/165610190</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:59:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Danish Court Tells ISP To Block PirateBay</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Back in 2006, a Danish court demanded that ISP Tele2 start <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20061026/161240.shtml">blocking access</a> to the AllofMp3.com website.  It seemed like a bizarre request, focused on just one ISP.  While the ISP complied, apparently the block was quite easy to get around and the overall impact of the ban was minimal.  However, that didn't stop the IFPI from talking up what an important move it was.  Along those lines, the IFPI has now convinced a Danish judge to also tell Tele2 that <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080204.wgtdenmakbay0204/BNStory/Technology/?page=rss&#038;id=RTGAM.20080204.wgtdenmakbay0204" target="_new">it needs to block the Pirate Bay</a> as well.  Are they going to demand that Tele2 also blocks Google and Usenet?  It's difficult to see the rationale behind this -- and even more difficult to understand why they think that this time such a block will actually be effective.  Yet, of course, the IFPI will talk about what a significant move this is in their ongoing fight against <strike>new business models</strike> piracy.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080204/213143171.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>if-at-first-you-don't-succeed...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20080204/213143171</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>