<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;stemcells&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 09:15:30 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Children's Hospital 'Allowed' To Continue Research Using System It Developed After Patent Fight</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100616/1037129853.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100616/1037129853.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last month, we wrote about the absolutely ridiculous situation, where Children's Hospital of Orange County had to shelve its research into brain diseases for children for <i>three years</i>, because the company StemCells <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100525/0310309561.shtml">claimed it had a patent</a> on the technique the researchers at the hospital were using.  Of course, the hospital researchers had developed the technique entirely independently (potentially before StemCells did), but due to the patent, apparently that didn't matter.  The small bit of good news is after three years of stifled research, StemCells and Children's Hospital have <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/bay-area-news/ci_15303405?source=rss&#038;nclick_check=1" target="_blank">worked out an agreement</a> to give the hospital a "license" for free.  While this is good news, it's still quite worrisome that we had to deal with three years of stifled research to get to this point where some researchers could use techniques they, themselves, developed.
<br /><br />
Even worse, because of the nature of the agreement -- a license from StemCells -- the press gets to erroneously suggest that somehow Children's Hospital had taken something from StemCells.  Note the opening sentence of the article above:
<blockquote><i>
Palo Alto biotech company StemCells will allow a children's research hospital to use its patented technology for free, clearing the way for greater study of conditions such as autism, brain cancer and neurological disease.
</i></blockquote>
Remember, this is a technique that the researchers at the hospital <b>came up with on their own</b>, and now the press is saying that some other company "will allow" them to use it?  And saying that it's actually using that company's "patented technology," when that's not true at all?  The hospital isn't using StemCells' patented technology.  Its using its own techniques that it developed.
<br /><br />
This is a point that we've <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090219/0149073830.shtml">raised before</a>.  So many reporters contribute to massive misconceptions about patents by writing sentences like the one above.  It implies that patent lawsuits really are about one group "copying" an idea or technology from another, and that the patent holder "owns" the technology itself.  This is blatantly untrue in most cases.
<br /><br />
What a ridiculous world we live in where a <i>hospital</i> researching brain diseases for children has to beg and plead for three years to be "allowed" to use its own technology, and then have the press make it sound like it had copied that technology from someone else.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100616/1037129853.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100616/1037129853.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100616/1037129853.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>bizarro-world</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100616/1037129853</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 11:11:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Patents Now Getting In The Way Of Important Brain Research</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100525/0310309561.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100525/0310309561.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/05/24/171220/Stem-Cell-Patent-Halts-Hospitals-Collection?from=twitter" target="_blank">Slashdot</a> points us to yet another in a very long line of stories about patents holding back key, potentially life-saving, research.  This story involves a biotech firm, StemCells, that is making a legal threat to a hospital doing research on brain diseases in children.  Because of the threats, <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_15139305?nclick_check=1&#038;forced=true" target="_blank">the research has been shut down for three years</a>:
<blockquote><i>
With his research stymied, "all the money has shifted from the lab to the lawyers," said Schwartz, who said he believes the cells may hold deep secrets to such devastating conditions as autism, brain cancer and neurological disease.
</i></blockquote>
What's really annoying here is that the doctor doing this research at the hospital had developed the technique himself with some others at the Salk Institute, but they chose not to patent it (perhaps following in the footsteps of Jonas Salk himself, who when asked about patenting the polio vaccine replied: "There is no patent. Could you patent the sun?").  Of course, StemCells jumped in and patented the technique themselves, and then went after the doctor in the midst of his research.
<br /><br />
Apparently, "promoting the progress" doesn't include saving kids from deadly brain diseases.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100525/0310309561.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100525/0310309561.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100525/0310309561.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>promoting-the-progress</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100525/0310309561</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>