<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;retroshare&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:33:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>German Court Holds Internet User Responsible For Passing On Unknown, Encrypted File</title>
<dc:creator>Glyn Moody</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121127/13221421157/german-court-holds-internet-user-responsible-passing-unknown-encrypted-file.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121127/13221421157/german-court-holds-internet-user-responsible-passing-unknown-encrypted-file.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A natural response to the increasingly harsh enforcement of laws against unauthorized sharing of copyright files is to move to encrypted connections.  It seems like a perfect solution: nobody can eavesdrop, and so nobody can find out what you are sharing.  But as TorrentFreak reports, <a href="https://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-file-sharing-ruled-illegal-by-german-court-121123/">a German court has just dealt a blow to this approach</a>.
</p><p>
The case involves <a href="http://retroshare.sourceforge.net/">RetroShare</a>, which describes itself thus:

<i><blockquote>RetroShare is a Open Source cross-platform, Friend-2-Friend and secure decentralised communication platform.
<br /><br />
It lets you to securely chat and share files with your friends and family, using a web-of-trust to authenticate peers and OpenSSL to encrypt all communication. RetroShare provides filesharing, chat, messages, forums and channels</blockquote></i>

That sounds pretty safe, but TorrentFreak explains why it wasn't in the current case: 

<i><blockquote>This week a Hamburg court ruled against a RetroShare user who passed on an encrypted transfer that turned out to be a copyrighted music file. The user in question was not aware of the transfer, and merely passed on the data in a way similar to how TOR works.
<br /><br />
The court, however, ruled that the user in question, who was identified by the copyright holder, is responsible for passing on the encrypted song.
<br /><br />
The judge ordered an injunction against the RetroShare user, who is now forbidden from transferring the song with a maximum penalty of &euro;250,000 or a six month prison term. Since RetroShare traffic is encrypted this means that the user can no longer use the network without being at risk.</blockquote></i>

That's because the user can't know what's in an encrypted file passing through his or her system, and thus cannot guarantee that it is not the song in question.  In truth, this situation is partly the user's own fault:

<i><blockquote>RetroShare derives its security from the fact that all transfers go through "trusted friends" who users themselves add. In this case, the defendant added the anti-piracy monitoring company as a friend, which allowed him to be "caught."</blockquote></i>

But even if the court case in Hamburg is a result of fairly exceptional circumstances, it creates an awful precedent: that German users are responsible for encrypted contents passing through their connection, even though there is no way they can know what they might contain.  Unfortunately, this is of a piece with a previous ruling by a German court that people can be <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100512/1116409394.shtml">fined</a> for what others do with their open wifi connections, regardless of whether they knew what was going on.
</p><p>

Follow me @glynmoody on <a href="http://twitter.com/glynmoody">Twitter</a> or <a href="http://identi.ca/glynmoody">identi.ca</a>, and on <a href="https://plus.google.com/100647702320088380533">Google+</a></p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121127/13221421157/german-court-holds-internet-user-responsible-passing-unknown-encrypted-file.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121127/13221421157/german-court-holds-internet-user-responsible-passing-unknown-encrypted-file.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121127/13221421157/german-court-holds-internet-user-responsible-passing-unknown-encrypted-file.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>knowing-the-unknowable</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121127/13221421157</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 5 Mar 2012 13:26:01 PST</pubDate>
<title>File Sharing Moves En Masse To The Darknet; Good Luck Shutting That Down</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120305/03504817977/file-sharing-moves-en-masse-to-darknet-good-luck-shutting-that-down.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120305/03504817977/file-sharing-moves-en-masse-to-darknet-good-luck-shutting-that-down.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ It's not like this wasn't easily predictable, but as the entertainment industry has "succeeded" in taking down Megaupload and continues to move against The Pirate Bay and others, anyone who's followed this space had to have known that file sharing would just move one step further underground.  We've seen the same thing after every single "victory" against file sharing since Napster was shut down.  Each time, it moves to a system slightly more underground and more distributed.  The early ones were still easy to take down but as they get further underground, it just becomes worse for the industry (and makes it <i>that much harder</i> to win back those users).  The latest news is that there's been <a href="http://torrentfreak.com/anonymous-decentralized-and-uncensored-file-sharing-is-booming-120302/" target="_blank">massive uptake of a growing number of anonymous, decentralized file-sharing tools</a>.  As is pretty typical in these "shift" periods, it's still not clear which systems will "win" out over the others, but the leaders are starting to emerge.  The Torrentfreak article above mentions players like Tribler and RetroShare.  People in our comments have been discussing both, as well as Ares Galaxy.  Who knows if any of these apps are actually any good, but it seems pretty clear that people are continuing to file share -- they're just finding ways to do so that are even harder to track down and stop.  How long until the legacy entertainment industry starts publishing articles about these evil anonymous, decentralized file sharing systems and demanding new laws against them?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120305/03504817977/file-sharing-moves-en-masse-to-darknet-good-luck-shutting-that-down.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120305/03504817977/file-sharing-moves-en-masse-to-darknet-good-luck-shutting-that-down.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120305/03504817977/file-sharing-moves-en-masse-to-darknet-good-luck-shutting-that-down.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>the-industry-loses-another-generation</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120305/03504817977</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>