<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;rapiscan&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:05:25 PST</pubDate>
<title>Chris Matthews Says That Pointing Out Chertoff's Conflict Of Interest Over Rapiscan TSA Scanners Is Slander?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101129/02381512037/chris-matthews-says-that-pointing-out-chertoffs-conflict-interest-over-rapiscan-tsa-scanners-is-slander.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101129/02381512037/chris-matthews-says-that-pointing-out-chertoffs-conflict-interest-over-rapiscan-tsa-scanners-is-slander.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Michael Chertoff's <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101121/21414311956/president-obama-after-traveling-with-naked-scanner-ceo-defends-naked-scans.shtml">conflict of interest</a> over the Rapiscan full body "naked" scanners used by the TSA in airports is old news.  It was reported on widely earlier this year, and again in the past few weeks.  So it does seem kind of odd (as pointed out via <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/radleybalko/statuses/7445980131622913" target="_blank">Radley Balko</a>) that MSNBC TV guy Chris Matthews appears to <a href="http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/matthews-accuses-epics-mccall-slandering" target="_blank">accuse someone of slander for pointing it out</a>.  Of course, if you watch the video, what Matthews does is even more insidious -- which is taking what Ginger McCall actually says, and twisting it to pretend she said something different.  She points out -- accurately -- the conflict of interest, and he claims she's saying that the only reason we have these devices was because of corruption and "sweetheart deals" back when Chertoff was head of Homeland Security.  But McCall was merely pointing out that there's a "revolving door" at these agencies, and machines are pitched by former government folks, with little evidence that they're effective.  Matthews totally takes what McCall actually says and pretends (falsely) that she claimed he made a corrupt deal while still in power.  This is what passes for journalism these days?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101129/02381512037/chris-matthews-says-that-pointing-out-chertoffs-conflict-interest-over-rapiscan-tsa-scanners-is-slander.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101129/02381512037/chris-matthews-says-that-pointing-out-chertoffs-conflict-interest-over-rapiscan-tsa-scanners-is-slander.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101129/02381512037/chris-matthews-says-that-pointing-out-chertoffs-conflict-interest-over-rapiscan-tsa-scanners-is-slander.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>ah,-the-media</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101129/02381512037</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 07:19:50 PST</pubDate>
<title>President Obama, After Traveling With Naked Scanner CEO, Defends Naked Scans</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101121/21414311956/president-obama-after-traveling-with-naked-scanner-ceo-defends-naked-scans.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101121/21414311956/president-obama-after-traveling-with-naked-scanner-ceo-defends-naked-scans.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ As the whole mess with the TSA scanners has received a lot more attention in the last week or so, a few folks are <a href="http://beforeitsnews.com/story/272/367/If_you_touch_Chertoffs_junk_scanners_hell_have_you_arrested_for_losing_him_megabucks_on_their_sales..html" target="_blank">noticing that ex-Homeland Security boss Michael Chertoff</a>, who's been quite busy defending the naked scanners, happens to be making a ton of money from one of the main ones, Rapiscan, made by OSI, a client of Chertoff's consulting firm.  Of course, similar concerns were brought up <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/01/02/group_slams_chertoff_on_scanner_promotion/" target="_blank">a year ago</a> when Chertoff was busy promoting the scanners, but it appears that many in the mainstream press continue to highlight his old Homeland Security title, while downplaying his current role making money from seeing those scanners sold.
<br /><br />
However, perhaps even more interesting is the news that President Obama was finally asked to address the whole thing this weekend, and (not surprisingly) <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/tv/president-obama-tsa-pat-downs-an-inconvenience-for-all-of-us-except-him/" target="_blank">defended the scans and the pat downs as "the only [procedures] right now that [the TSA] considers to be effective,"</a> to prevent terrorism (while also admitting that he doesn't have to go through security to get on airplanes, so he hasn't experienced the scans.
<br /><br />
No surprise there.  Of course, what he <i>didn't</i> mention is that he just got done <a href="http://investors.osi-systems.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=530184" target="_blank">traveling with the CEO of OSI</a>, the parent company of Rapiscan, the makers of the main naked scanner that is being purchased and put into all these airports.  Apparently, OSI CEO, Deepak Chopra (no, not the new agey guy), "was selected to accompany US President, Barack Obama, to Mumbai and attended the US India Business Entrepreneurship meeting..."
<br /><br />
Now, of course, all of this may be perfectly legit and reasonable.  There may be plenty of reasons why all of these things happened.  Chertoff and Obama may really believe these scanners are the best way to protect us.  But, as Larry Lessig has been fond of pointing out lately with his anti-corruption project, it's these kinds of "connections" that make the American public lose trust in their government, since it can certainly be read in a rather corrupt manner.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101121/21414311956/president-obama-after-traveling-with-naked-scanner-ceo-defends-naked-scans.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101121/21414311956/president-obama-after-traveling-with-naked-scanner-ceo-defends-naked-scans.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101121/21414311956/president-obama-after-traveling-with-naked-scanner-ceo-defends-naked-scans.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>well,-look-at-that...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101121/21414311956</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>