<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;qanta&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:00:47 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Can We Just Admit That It's Insane When Microsoft Has A 'Licensing Program' For Someone Else's Products?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111013/17205316345/can-we-just-admit-that-its-insane-when-microsoft-has-licensing-program-someone-elses-products.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111013/17205316345/can-we-just-admit-that-its-insane-when-microsoft-has-licensing-program-someone-elses-products.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There have been a string of similar "deals" announced recently (though we do <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20110930/09191916150/microsoft-samsung-licensing-deal-tells-us-nothing-about-facts-just-about-fud.shtml">wonder</a> about the details), but Microsoft has announced that Qanta is the latest company <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-20119908-75/microsoft-inks-android-chrome-deal-with-quanta/?tag=mncol;txt" target="_blank">to "license" its usage of Android and Chrome</a>.  Here's Microsoft's quote on the subject:
<blockquote><i>
"We are pleased to have reached this agreement with Quanta, and proud of the continued success of our Android licensing program in resolving IP issues surrounding Android and Chrome devices in the marketplace." 
</i></blockquote>
Let's sit back and consider the <i>sheer insanity</i> of this entire effort.  <i>Microsoft</i> is going around, trying to get lots of companies to buy licenses to <i>Google's products</i>, when there is simply no evidence that those products infringe on any Microsoft patents.  And, notably, Microsoft has never sued Google over those products.
<br /><br />
I'd be interested to see if anyone can explain how a system that allows a company like Microsoft to set up a licensing business on someone else's products without any proven legal basis other than the implied threat that they might sue, is a functioning system?  It's a huge joke.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111013/17205316345/can-we-just-admit-that-its-insane-when-microsoft-has-licensing-program-someone-elses-products.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111013/17205316345/can-we-just-admit-that-its-insane-when-microsoft-has-licensing-program-someone-elses-products.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111013/17205316345/can-we-just-admit-that-its-insane-when-microsoft-has-licensing-program-someone-elses-products.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>just-saying</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111013/17205316345</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>