<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;philips&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Step Right Up And Try Your Luck...</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101201/00025512072/dailydirt-step-right-up-try-your-luck.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101201/00025512072/dailydirt-step-right-up-try-your-luck.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Over the last few years, there have been plenty of crowdsourcing platforms to find solutions to difficult problems. And we've seen some brilliant examples of challenges solved via this method. But it doesn't work every time (nor should anyone expect it to). Here are just a few more <a href="https://www.insightcommunity.com/case.php?iid=1379">open contests</a> to find some innovative answers.
<ul>
<li> <a title="http://www.lightingprize.org/philips-winner.stm" href="http://bit.ly/p0LYxg">The DOE awarded Philips Lighting North America with the L Prize and $10 million for developing a replacement for the 60-watt incandescent bulb that only uses 10 Watts to achieve the same light output.</a> Apparently, approximately 425 million 60-watt incandescent light bulbs are sold in the United States every year, so if incandescent bulbs could be replaced without a public outcry.... [<a href="http://www.lightingprize.org/philips-winner.stm">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://www.popsci.com/node/57680/" href="http://bit.ly/octjNp">Out of about 400 applicants, a solution for the Wendy Schmidt Oil Cleanup X Challenge to clean up massive oil spills like the BP-Deepwater Horizon disaster has been found that is three times better than previous techniques.</a> Team Elastec/American Marine recovered oil at 4,670 gallons per minute and won a $1 million prize. [<a href="http://www.popsci.com/node/57680/">url</a>]</li>
<li> <a title="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/14/u-s-air-force-is-opening-up-rocket-contracts-for-competition/" href="http://bit.ly/oSrfXI">The US Air Force, NASA and the National Reconnaissance Office have opened up a competition for rocket launch contracts.</a> The United Launch Alliance might not be the only way for the US military to fly to space -- if companies like Space X can really create suitable rocket systems. [<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2011/10/14/u-s-air-force-is-opening-up-rocket-contracts-for-competition/">url</a>]</li>
<li><b>To discover more interesting business-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:61" href="http://bit.ly/ht6Uq9">check out what the deal is on StumbleUpon.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:61">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 

By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101201/00025512072/dailydirt-step-right-up-try-your-luck.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101201/00025512072/dailydirt-step-right-up-try-your-luck.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101201/00025512072/dailydirt-step-right-up-try-your-luck.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101201/00025512072</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 19:39:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Ideas Do Matter, But That Has Nothing To Do With 'Intellectual Property'</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110607/09204914592/ideas-do-matter-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-intellectual-property.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110607/09204914592/ideas-do-matter-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-intellectual-property.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <a href="https://twitter.com/#!/glynmoody/statuses/78031645315317761" target="_blank">Glyn Moody</a> points us to a website put together by Microsoft, Philips and DSM -- three giant companies that have relied heavily on intellectual property laws to fend off upstart competitors and disruptive innovation -- called <a href="http://ideasmatter.com/" target="_blank">Ideas Matter - the value of intellectual property</a>.  As you can tell from the title, the website focuses on two key points, which they then try to conflate as a single point: (1) Ideas matter and (2) because of that, intellectual property is important.
<br /><br />
Of course, there's a huge problem with this: while ideas do matter, that has <i>nothing</i> to do with intellectual property.  As people are quick to point out in our comments any time we suggest that ideas are being blocked or censored by intellectual property laws, such laws <i>are not supposed to apply to <b>ideas</b></i>.  In fact, it's explicit with both copyright and patent law.  In copyright law, protection is supposed to be applied to expression, not ideas, and the difference is supposed to be key -- even if it isn't always observed.  Similarly, with patents, protection is supposed to be applied to inventions, not ideas -- again even if that isn't regularly observed in practice.
<br /><br />
To be honest, I find this particularly nefarious and disingenuous, in that any time people point out that ideas are being censored, defenders of IP laws insist that there's a split and "ideas" are not covered.  Yet, when these same folks seek to push forth a propaganda campaign in support of greater protectionism, they use the claim that "ideas matter" to support those laws.  Not surprisingly, given the nature of the site's name and premise itself, the rest of the site is filled with ridiculous and unsupported propaganda, such as this <a href="http://ideasmatter.com/hub/infographics.aspx" target="_blank">laughably misleading video</a> that seems to assume that because certain things <i>are</i> protected by intellectual property laws, they wouldn't exist without them.  It also tosses out ridiculous debunked industry figures on "losses" due to infringement.  This is extreme propaganda.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110607/09204914592/ideas-do-matter-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-intellectual-property.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110607/09204914592/ideas-do-matter-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-intellectual-property.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110607/09204914592/ideas-do-matter-that-has-nothing-to-do-with-intellectual-property.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>keep-up-folks</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110607/09204914592</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>