<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;nni&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:52:20 PST</pubDate>
<title>Irish Newspapers Budge Slightly: Now Say Links Don't Require Payment, But Snippets...</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130107/09171321594/irish-newspapers-budge-slightly-now-say-links-dont-require-payment-snippets.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130107/09171321594/irish-newspapers-budge-slightly-now-say-links-dont-require-payment-snippets.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last year, we wrote about the insane position from the group Newspaper Licensing Ireland (NLI), which represents the major newspapers in Ireland, in demanding that a charity <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120529/11010619116/irish-charity-told-it-needs-to-pay-license-fee-to-link-to-newspaper-article.shtml">pay them</a> for linking to newspaper stories.  In the last few weeks that story has been getting <a href="http://www.thejournal.ie/readme/newspapers-charges-linking-ireland-740093-Jan2013/?utm_source=shortlink" target="_blank">more and more attention</a> in Ireland, in part because a related, but different organization representing mostly the same Irish newspapers, National Newspapers of Ireland (NNI), made a submission to a government review of copyright arguing that <a href="http://www.nni.ie/v2/broad/portal.php?content=../_includes/prportal.php&#038;date=4th%20Jan%202013&#038;year=2013" target="_blank">linking is infringement</a> if done on any kind of commercial site (so, yeah, they'd probably consider that link to their site infringement).
<blockquote><i>
NNI made a submission to the effect that our view of existing legislation is that <b>the display and transmission of links does constitute an infringement of copyright</b> and our existing copyright law should not be amended in the manner discussed in the Consultation Paper.
</i></blockquote>
Meanwhile, the lawyers representing the charity have noticed that NLI appears to have <a href="http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/2013/01/07/irish-newspapers-and-links-a-welcome-evolution-of-position/" target="_blank">backtracked ever so slightly</a> and are now saying that "links alone" are not infringement, but if you include any text, you've gone over the line.  They've put up a new statement reading, in part:
<blockquote><i>
For commercial use: NLI does not require a licence from any organisation which only displays or transmits links to newspaper content. A licence is required when there is other reproduction of the newspaper content, such as display of PDFs or text extracts.
</i></blockquote>
Of course, whether or not they consider reproducing <i>that</i> text as copyright infringement is left as an exercise for the reader.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130107/09171321594/irish-newspapers-budge-slightly-now-say-links-dont-require-payment-snippets.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130107/09171321594/irish-newspapers-budge-slightly-now-say-links-dont-require-payment-snippets.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130107/09171321594/irish-newspapers-budge-slightly-now-say-links-dont-require-payment-snippets.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>keep-digging</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20130107/09171321594</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>