<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;kei&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Dec 2012 03:21:51 PST</pubDate>
<title>Latest TPP Round Locks Out Public Interest Groups Who Flew To New Zealand; Gives Them 15 Minutes Of Access</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121204/17393321227/latest-tpp-round-locks-out-public-interest-groups-who-flew-to-new-zealand-gives-them-15-minutes-access.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121204/17393321227/latest-tpp-round-locks-out-public-interest-groups-who-flew-to-new-zealand-gives-them-15-minutes-access.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The various government bodies negotiating the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) have been criticized repeatedly for their lack of transparency.  In the last few negotiating meetings, they've tried to respond to this by arguing that they allowed public interest / civil society groups various ways to meet with and interact with the delegates.  For the most part, this interaction was way too limited, but it was something.  However, for the latest negotiating round in New Zealand, it appears that these groups have been almost entirely excluded.  Representatives from a bunch of groups fighting for the public interest -- including EFF, KEI, OpenMedia.ca, Public Citizen and others flew all the way to New Zealand... <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/12/digital-rights-groups-shut-out-secret-tpp-negotiations" target="_blank">only to be barred from the premises where the negotiations are being held</a>, save for a brief 15 minute session for each on one day of the 10 day negotiation.
<blockquote><i>
Academics, experts, consumer groups, Internet freedom organizations, libraries, educational institutions, patients and access to medicines groups have flown a long way from around the world to Auckland, New Zealand, to engage with delegates in the 15th round of Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations.
<br /><br />
For the first time, however, we have been locked out of the entire venue, except for a single day out of the 10 days of negotiations. This not only alienates us as members of public interest groups, but also the hundreds of thousands of innovators, educators, patients, students, and Internet users who have sent messages to government representatives expressing their concerns with the TPP. All of us oppose the complete unjustifiable secrecy around the negotiations, but more importantly, the IP provisions that could potentially threaten our rights, and innovation.
<br /><br />
These new physical restrictions on us are reflective of the ongoing lack of transparency that has plagued the TPP negotiations from the very beginning.
</i></blockquote>
This is really shameful behavior on the part of the New Zealand hosts.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121204/17393321227/latest-tpp-round-locks-out-public-interest-groups-who-flew-to-new-zealand-gives-them-15-minutes-access.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121204/17393321227/latest-tpp-round-locks-out-public-interest-groups-who-flew-to-new-zealand-gives-them-15-minutes-access.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121204/17393321227/latest-tpp-round-locks-out-public-interest-groups-who-flew-to-new-zealand-gives-them-15-minutes-access.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>shameful</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20121204/17393321227</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:52:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>The USPTO's Reality Distortion Field: Web Filter Blocks Critics Like EFF, Welcomes Maximalist Lobbyists</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120918/12131620417/usptos-reality-distortion-field-web-filter-blocks-critics-like-eff-welcomes-maximalist-lobbyists.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120918/12131620417/usptos-reality-distortion-field-web-filter-blocks-critics-like-eff-welcomes-maximalist-lobbyists.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <i><b>Updated</b>: At 5pm ET, the USPTO called Jamie to say that a contractor had set this up, and after reviewing their policies, they had stopped blocking such sites...  </i>
<br /><br />
Well this is bizarre.  Jamie Love from KEI was over at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for a meeting about "global negotiations on intellectual property and access to medicine."  The meeting itself was held in a room that it uses for the USPTO's Global Intellectual Property Academy (GIPA), and there is free WiFi for people to use.  Love tried to log onto his own website... and found <a href="http://keionline.org/node/1548" target="_blank">that it was being blocked as a "political/activist group."</a>
<blockquote><i>
Access Denied (content_filter_denied) 
<br /><br />
Your request was denied because this URL contains content that is categorized as: "Political/Activist Groups" which is blocked by USPTO policy. If you believe the categorization is inaccurate, please contact the USPTO Service Desk and request a manual review of the URL.
<br /><br />
For assistance, contact USPTO OCIO IT Service Desk. (io-proxy4)
</i></blockquote>
Love then checked a bunch of other sites... and noticed a rather distressing pattern.  For public interest groups who advocate that the existing copyright/patent system is broken, the websites were all blocked.  ACLU, EFF, Public Knowledge, Public Citizen, CDT... all blocked.  However, if you're a lobbyist for maximalism?  No problem!  MPAA, RIAA, IIPA, IPI, PHRMA, BSA... come on through.  They do allow Creative Commons.  Thankfully (for us, at least), they don't seem to block blogs that talk about this stuff.  Techdirt is allowed, as are things like BoingBoing, Groklaw and Larry Lessig and Michael Geist's blogs.  Though, oddly, a bunch of political sites (DailyKos, TPM, RedState, Rush Limgaugh's site) are blocked.
<br /><br />
It may be an "over active" filter -- but it does seem particularly disturbing that all those groups who fight for the public's rights on the very issues the USPTO is dealing with on a regular basis have their sites completely blocked.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120918/12131620417/usptos-reality-distortion-field-web-filter-blocks-critics-like-eff-welcomes-maximalist-lobbyists.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120918/12131620417/usptos-reality-distortion-field-web-filter-blocks-critics-like-eff-welcomes-maximalist-lobbyists.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120918/12131620417/usptos-reality-distortion-field-web-filter-blocks-critics-like-eff-welcomes-maximalist-lobbyists.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>but-techdirt's-available</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120918/12131620417</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>