<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;img&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:10:45 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Can The University Of Kentucky Ban Student Newspaper From Being Distributed At Its Stadium?</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101018/03435511468/can-the-university-of-kentucky-ban-student-newspaper-from-being-distributed-at-its-stadium.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101018/03435511468/can-the-university-of-kentucky-ban-student-newspaper-from-being-distributed-at-its-stadium.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ College sports have become a big business.  That's no secret.  We see it all the time, and at times that's used to stifle <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091231/1111117566.shtml" target="_blank">elements of free speech</a>, such as in making fan-created t-shirts and such illegal.  Now it's going even further.  <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/romenesko/statuses/27475421685" target="_blank">Romenesko</a> points us to the news that the University of Kentucky, a state-funded university, has <a href="http://kykernel.com/2010/10/14/uk-stops-kernel-distribution-at-stadium/" target="_blank">banned the distribution of a free student newspaper</a> at the University's Commonwealth Stadium before football games.  Apparently, UK has a marketing contract with sports licensing giant IMG, which they believe gives IMG a monopoly on any media efforts around the stadium.  Of course, plenty of folks are pointing out that this is a pretty clear First Amendment problem.  It's a public government-owned entity, forbidding the distribution of speech.  The contract with IMG is meaningless as you can't contract away others' free speech rights.  It sounds like folks are gearing up for a legal challenge here, which should be worth following.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101018/03435511468/can-the-university-of-kentucky-ban-student-newspaper-from-being-distributed-at-its-stadium.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101018/03435511468/can-the-university-of-kentucky-ban-student-newspaper-from-being-distributed-at-its-stadium.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101018/03435511468/can-the-university-of-kentucky-ban-student-newspaper-from-being-distributed-at-its-stadium.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>hello-first-amendment</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20101018/03435511468</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>