<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;iatse&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:03:25 PST</pubDate>
<title>Hollywood Union Members Sign Petition Asking MPAA &#038; Hollywood Unions To Stop Supporting PIPA/SOPA</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111230/23592317245/hollywood-union-members-sign-petition-asking-mpaa-hollywood-unions-to-stop-supporting-pipasopa.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111230/23592317245/hollywood-union-members-sign-petition-asking-mpaa-hollywood-unions-to-stop-supporting-pipasopa.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ The opposition to SOPA and PIPA continues to come from all sorts of places.  The latest interesting one?  Union members who work on movies and TV... whose bosses signed them up as supporters of SOPA and PIPA <i>against their wishes</i>.  They've <a href="http://www.change.org/petitions/a-petition-to-the-iatse-ibt-mpaa-wga-sag-dga-and-aftra-to-formally-oppose-hr3261-stop-online-piracy-act-and-s968-protect-ip-act" target="_blank">put together a petition urging  the MPAA, IATSE, IBT, WGA, SAG, DGA, and AFTRA</a> to formally <i>oppose</i> both SOPA and PIPA, noting that it would be a barrier to innovation that Hollywood desperately needs, wouldn't actually stop infringement, and would also be an online security nightmare.  The groups listed in the petition are basically all of the groups that have been major supporters of the bill, but as some of the signatories note, they want no part of this.  Just a few examples:
<blockquote><i>
I'm a proud Local One and USA829 member, and am appalled to find my union supporting this act. While I agree that piracy is bad, this act is ill-designed by legislators with no clue how the internet works, and guided by greedy corporations who have ulterior motives, and who have a track record of abusing the DMCA the same way they'll abuse this.
<br /><br />
It will do nothing to stop it, will give unfettered power prone to abuse to corporations who don't deserve it, will short circuit due process, and will have huge unintended negative effects on the internet as a whole.
</i></blockquote>
And, another one from a studio grip:
<blockquote><i>
Proud Local 80 Motion Picture Studio Grip and I'm signing because these bills go too far. I'd like to think that IATSE is just trying to do what's best for its members. But, I think once they dig past the surface they will see the same thing I did. And that is that these bills need to be quashed. We need another way to deal with piracy.
</i></blockquote>
Once again, for all the talk of widespread "support" of SOPA and PIPA, it seems to be crumbling in every direction, including from within the groups who have acted as if these bills were absolutely necessary.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111230/23592317245/hollywood-union-members-sign-petition-asking-mpaa-hollywood-unions-to-stop-supporting-pipasopa.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111230/23592317245/hollywood-union-members-sign-petition-asking-mpaa-hollywood-unions-to-stop-supporting-pipasopa.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111230/23592317245/hollywood-union-members-sign-petition-asking-mpaa-hollywood-unions-to-stop-supporting-pipasopa.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>losing-your-own-members</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20111230/23592317245</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:44:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>Entertainment Industry: Yes, Please Keep Negotiating Secret Copyright Treaty To Save Our Asses</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091120/1605477032.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091120/1605477032.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Sherwin Siy (one of the few people who actually was allowed to glance briefly at parts of the proposed ACTA treaty, though under strict NDA) has written about <a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/2779" target="_blank">yet another letter sent by the entertainment industry</a> to the government in support of ACTA.  This letter includes pretty much everyone who benefits from abusing copyright laws and is afraid of the internet: 
<blockquote><i>
Advertising Photographers of America<br>
American Association of Independent Music (A2IM)<br>
American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA)<br>
American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP)<br>
American Society of Media Photographers, Inc. (ASMP)<br>
Association of American Publishers (AAP)<br>
Broadcast Music, Inc (BMI)<br>
Commercial Photographers International<br>
Directors Guild of America (DGA)<br>
Evidence Photographers International Council<br>
Independent Film and Television Alliance (IFTA)<br>
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE)<br>
Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (MPAA)<br>
National Music Publishers Association (NMPA)<br>
NBC Universal<br>
News Corporation<br>
Picture Archive Council of America (PACA)<br>
Professional Photographers of America (PPA)<br>
Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)<br>
Reed Elsevier Inc.<br>
Society of Sport & Event Photographers<br>
Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA)<br>
Stock Artists Alliance<br>
Student Photographic Society<br>
The Advertising Photographers of America<br>
The Walt Disney Company<br>
Time Warner, Inc.<br>
Universal Music Group<br>
Viacom Inc.<br>
Warner Music Group
</i></blockquote>
Funny... isn't it, that all these companies and industry groups are supporting a deal that no one's seen yet?  Oh wait... that's because many of them <i>have</i> seen it and actually have had a hand in creating it.  But what's really damning is that no where in the letter do they explain why this is actually needed or how it will do anything valuable.  Instead, it's a pure faith-based letter saying "if you pass this secret treaty, good things will happen."  I don't know about you, but generally, I prefer there to be actual proof and evidence that restricting consumer rights around the world actually leads to some sort of real benefit.
<br><br>
Tellingly, they don't respond to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091119/1904177017.shtml">any of the points</a> we raised earlier.  This is not a treaty to help people or the economy.  It's a deal to try to sneak through a system for propping up an obsolete business model by companies who don't want to adapt.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091120/1605477032.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091120/1605477032.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091120/1605477032.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>yeah,-that's-convincing</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20091120/1605477032</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>