<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;eharmony&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 7 Jun 2012 17:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>DailyDirt: Modern Computer Dating</title>
<dc:creator>Michael Ho</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ There are search engines for just about everything. Computers help people find all sorts of things faster and easier, so it's not surprising that computer dating is decades old (and <a href="http://www.damninteresting.com/forty-years-of-computer-dating/">started</a> out with punch cards). Technology has gotten a lot better, but has online dating really improved that much?

<ul>
<li> <a title="http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/14/419-why-dating-sites-are-broken/" href="http://bit.ly/JXICGj">Online dating sites claim to be able to find soul mates, but studies suggest they can only provide introductions -- and more often than not, they instill a "shopping mindset" which is not conducive to building lasting relationships.</a> Some psychologists even doubt the possibility of creating algorithms that could successfully match people for real romance. (But experts also scoffed at the first chess-playing computers, too.) [<a href="http://paidcontent.org/2012/02/14/419-why-dating-sites-are-broken/">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=1726" href="http://bit.ly/Ni7YQe">In 2005, Steven Carter, the director of research at eHarmony, described how his work to create predictive models for compatibility became the basis of his dream job.</a> Carter is probably a bit biased, so where is some peer review for eHarmony's research? [<a href="http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=1726">url</a>]</li>

<li> <a title="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/04/30/151550273/to-predict-dating-success-the-secrets-in-the-pronouns?" href="http://n.pr/KiNGBS">Perhaps some intense linguistic analysis can predict dating success.</a> Apparently, people who have similar speech patterns are more likely to date each other. Watch your use of pronouns, folks.... [<a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/04/30/151550273/to-predict-dating-success-the-secrets-in-the-pronouns?">url</a>]</li>

<li><b>To discover more interesting tech-related content, <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:Technology" href="http://bit.ly/ewIrx5">check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe.</a></b> [<a href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/topic:Technology">url</a>]  <a title="what's this?" href="#" class="whatsthis help_ddstumble">&nbsp;</a>
</li>
</ul> 


By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good <a title="http://www.stumbleupon.com/to/stumble/stumblethru:www.techdirt.com" href="http://bit.ly/fagV8c">Techdirt</a> articles, too.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100610/1702589775/dailydirt-modern-computer-dating.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>urls-we-dig-up</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100610/1702589775</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>