<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;buzzirk&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Jun 2011 09:24:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Dubious Record Label Insists It Has A 'Patent-Pending' Method To Guarantee A Platinum Selling Album</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/00303814468/dubious-record-label-insists-it-has-patent-pending-method-to-guarantee-platinum-selling-album.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/00303814468/dubious-record-label-insists-it-has-patent-pending-method-to-guarantee-platinum-selling-album.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Do you remember Zer01?  Two years ago, there was all sorts of buzz around this "mobile VoIP" company that was mostly deflated after a few articles dug into the company, its product and its plan, and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1746225615.shtml">questioned</a> whether there was anything real there, or if it was an elaborate multi-level marketing scam designed to part people from their money without delivering any product.  The company's one big accolade, a "Best of Show" award from Laptop Magazine, was <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090808/1906025814.shtml">rescinded</a> after the details and questions came out suggesting that Zer01 was a pure vaporware company that may have been cashing in on getting multi-level marketers to pay upfront for a product that was never going to be delivered.  Despite "true believers" stopping by our comments on some of those posts to insist that Zer01 was real and was going to make them rich, in the end it went nowhere, with the website disappearing and Zer01 <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1212369586.shtml">losing a $43 million lawsuit</a> to its "multi-level marketing" partner, Global Verge.  Of course, it didn't help that Zer01's lawyers dropped the company after Zer01's boastful CEO Ben Piilani, who <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090813/1039415865.shtml">blamed everyone else</a> for the company's troubles, "stopped replying to contact" from his lawyers.
<br /><br />
So, it was with interest that I learned (from our own Derek Kerton, who helped expose Zer01 along with reporter Nancy Gohring) that Piilani is apparently back in business, with a new company in a totally different space claiming to have <a href="http://www.40billion.com/view_resource.asp?resid=609172732" target="_blank">created a patent-pending method to guarantee a new album goes platinum</a>.  The label, with the horrible name, 5iveSe7en Records (he just loves mixing words and numbers, apparently) makes some pretty out there claims, just like with Zer01:
<blockquote><i>
We have devised a patent pending method and process that will allow us to guarantee platinum recording status to every artist we sign, all while leveraging the power of the Internet and subsequently revitalizing the music industry back into something worth-while, meaningful, and exciting to both the artist and the consumers alike.
<br /><br />
5iveSe7en Records will extrapolate the full power of our patent pending methods by leverage the power of the Internet by using readily available proven tools such as social based member networks in the music niche, along with social gaming and digital content distribution to create value amongst music enthusiast and artist alike.
<br /><br />
5iveSe7en discovers and gives commercial viability to thousands of underground artists who these days populate the playlists of music enthusiasts. Many start-ups have tried but failed to address this market. That&rsquo;s where we come in.
<br /><br />
5iveSe7en will turn the record industry on its head. Each month we launch a new artist/group that will go "Platinum" out of the gate. Our method has been vetted by the RIAA. Think of us as "American Idol" meets "Facebook."
</i></blockquote>
Of course, if you look at the company's website (I won't link to it from here, as it doesn't deserve the link bump), it looks like the site hasn't been updated since the beginning of 2010, which seems like a long time for a company supposedly releasing a new <i>platinum</i> recording every month (vetted by the RIAA!).  Also... none of the links on the website appear to work.  I tried clicking on the details of its business model, its list of albums and current releases... and it all took me right back to the front page.
<br /><br />
The original link to a company "profile" has some more details.  It kicks off with a fantasy-land version of what's happening in the music industry (apparently, since people are downloading music, less music is being made, and now the charts are dominated by crap).  Then it explains that they'll magically build a "million-plus audience" of people who will pay in advance to receive 12 digital albums per year -- which the RIAA insists will count towards platinum status.  Of course, the plan is basically that a bunch of bands supposedly <i>pay</i> the label to be one of 300 bands that <i>might</i> get included that month, and then people vote (the "American Idol" part) as to which band wins.  The "winner" gets a "recording contract," the release through this system which goes to the subscribers, and a promise of a big fancy launch party.  The company already claims to have partnered with Sony Music, Universal Music and EMI (poor Warner Music, left in the cold, I guess).
<br /><br />
Of course, all of this requires those million-plus subscribers.  Each of whom have to be willing to pay $9.99 per year for 12 albums which they might not even like.
<br /><br />
Have no fear, Piilani has figured that out too:
<blockquote><i>
We understand that getting anyone to purchase something not only is a barrier to entry for the consumer, but also affects our dynamic growth potential. In example, FaceBook and Twitter have no problems gaining consumer traction because they give away the memberships. If they charged fifty cents they would not have experienced the growth that they have had, let alone $9.99 like we are attempting to do. <b>So in order to address this we have decided to seek investors to purchase our first 1 million subscribers so that we can give the memberships away</b>. In addition by having our first million subscribers acquired by our investors, we will be able to guarantee Platinum Recording status from the very start. This will also give us a large enough membership base that will appeal to future sponsors and advertisers. We continue this business model by finding corporate sponsors to continue to purchase subscribers from us that they can give away during their own promotions along with the fact that they will gain brand concentration with our membership base and advertising. Eventually we will have enough critical mass that consumers will pay the $9.99 to participate.
</i></blockquote>
Yes, you read that correctly.  The plan is that investors will pay for the subscriptions, followed by advertisers, rather than users.
<br /><br />
 I have to admit that the idea is just ridiculous enough to be brilliant.  Of course, the devil's in the details, and some of the details look pretty questionable for any artists.  Obviously, they're not making much in royalties from that "platinum selling" record, since each album is technically being "sold" for less than $1.  Of course, in exchange for widespread publicity, that's probably worth it.  However, the published business plan also suggests that any artists that sign up with the company are <i>also</i> handing over <i>lifetime</i> management rights:
<blockquote><i>
We own the management contract for the artist, so after we create a Platinum Recording Artist we can solicit them to be acquired by larger labels and we will receive 15% of all the artist&rsquo;s future income.
</i></blockquote>
What artists agree to let the record label that signs them also manage them?  That seems like a major conflict of interest.  Also, they downplay the fact that artists have to pay to "enter" for the chance to be "signed" to this label.  In fact, the details there aren't mentioned at all, other than in the middle of a long list of "revenue streams" for the company.  How many bands are willing to pay for a 1 in 300 chance to maybe get sent to a bunch of people?
<br /><br />
The plan also highlights the "qualified management team led by our CEO, Ben Piilani," whose bio mentions that a technology he worked on "won Best of Show at CTIA in 2009."  Curious that he doesn't name Zer01 as the company... and appears to totally omit the fact that the "Best of Show" award was <i>rescinded</i> a few months later by Laptop Magazine who clearly regretted the award and stated: "At this time we can only urge extreme caution to those interested in using or selling Zer01's service."
<br /><br />
I think we'd argue the same thing for anyone looking to invest in 5iveSe7en Records.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/00303814468/dubious-record-label-insists-it-has-patent-pending-method-to-guarantee-platinum-selling-album.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/00303814468/dubious-record-label-insists-it-has-patent-pending-method-to-guarantee-platinum-selling-album.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110531/00303814468/dubious-record-label-insists-it-has-patent-pending-method-to-guarantee-platinum-selling-album.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>there's-this-bridge-in-brooklyn...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20110531/00303814468</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 14:49:59 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Zer01 Loses $43 Million Lawsuit To MLM Partner For Never Delivering Phones</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1212369586.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1212369586.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Remember Zer01?  The company that made really quite stunning claims about being able to offer a VoIP-based mobile phone that would offer unlimited voice and data on smart phones for a low price?  After some investigations by reporters like <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135692/Zer01_s_mobile_offer_Too_good_to_be_true_" target="_blank">Nancy Gohring</a> and our own <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1746225615.shtml">Derek Kerton</a> it became pretty clear that the whole thing was pure vaporware, tied to a multi-level marketing (MLM) scheme that had a questionable past.  It certainly sucked in lots of folks, a bunch of whom showed up in our comments insisting that the phones were real and we'd be proven wrong soon enough.  Of course, multiple promised launch dates came and went with nothing to show for it.  Laptop Magazine, whose credibility took a big hit, <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090808/1906025814.shtml">rescinded</a> its "best of show" award for the product, and eventually the company tried to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090813/1039415865.shtml">blame everyone else for its problems</a>, suggesting that it was its MLM partner, Global Verge, who was the real problem.  Oh yeah, and all those journalists who asked tough questions and weren't satisfied with the non-answers they received.  As part of that Zer01 "dissolved" its relationship with Global Verge (the "parent" operation of Buzzirk Mobile, which was set up to sell Zer01 -- or, more accurately, to sell the "dream" of being a Zer01 sales rep, in typical MLM fashion).
<br /><br />
Of course, if it was really everyone else's fault, you would imagine that somewhere along the line, Zer01 would show up with an actual product.  One that people could see and actually use -- just as Derek had asked to use the "demo" phone at CTIA, a request that was denied.  But, of course, none of that happened.  Earlier this year, Zer01's website just disappeared.  It also turns out that Global Verge sued Zer01, and has now <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Zer01-Loses-43-Million-Judgement-108591" target="_blank">been awarded $43 million</a>.  Of course, considering that Zer01 seems to have disappeared entirely, you can consider that $43 million to be worth about the same as $43 million in Monopoly money.  Apparently, Zer01's boastful CEO, Ben Piilani lost his lawyers after <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/052510-zer01-slapped-with-43-million.html?hpg1=bn" target="_blank">"he stopped replying to contact from his counsel."</a>  In other words, Piilani has disappeared.
<br /><br />
Assuming that Piilani doesn't re-emerge and appeal, then Global Verge may try to take any assets it can, which may include some apparent patent applications that Zer01 claimed it had -- though, the details were never explained, so I wouldn't hold my breath on the actual existence of such patent applications, or the likelihood that they get approved.  Of course, as Gohring's <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/052510-zer01-slapped-with-43-million.html?page=2" target="_blank">latest piece on the saga</a> points out, many people are still upset with Global Verge for convincing them to sign up to sell these non-existent phones.  Global Verge tap dances around all this:
<blockquote><i>
"One of the misnomers out there is that with Zer01 that we were charging people to come into the company to sell the Zer01 service. We never charged any of our distributors one dime for any service or any phones or any of the ability to sell the phones or the service," he said.
<br /><br />
Yet, Robbins himself spoke repeatedly on conference calls for associates last year that were almost exclusively about the Zer01 service and the potential benefits of becoming an associate in order to sell the service.
<br /><br />
Robbins maintains that associates who signed up to become part of the marketing program last year did so in order to get other benefits of being part of Global Verge, such as national ID recovery, back-end management systems to manage their businesses, a video conferencing program and travel sites to save money on travel. 
</i></blockquote>
Of course, it seems that many of those who signed up don't agree.  Gohring notes that two dozen complaints have been filed against Global Verge to the Missouri state attorney general's office.  Yet another reminder that if something seems to be too good to be true... it probably is.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1212369586.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1212369586.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100526/1212369586.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>vaporware-scams</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100526/1212369586</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:21:30 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Zer01 Fails To Deliver Again; Blames Everyone Else, Dumps Buzzkirk, Threatens Legal Response To Reporters</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090813/1039415865.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090813/1039415865.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last month, following an excellent <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135692/Zer01_s_mobile_offer_Too_good_to_be_true_" target="_new">investigative report</a> by Nancy Gohring on a hyped up mobile service company called Zer01, our own Derek Kerton <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1746225615.shtml">weighed in</a> with his own findings about the company.  It all added up to an awful lot of questions.  There were numerous claims that were not substantiated.  Promises that were not lived up to.  Business partners with troubling histories.  And a whole lot more.  One of the <i>many</i> questionable aspects of the story was Zer01's relationship with Global Verge, a multi-level marketing company that had signed up a bunch of people to sell the service, which resulted in totally ridiculous claims about the service.  Some of those who had bought into the Global Verge/Buzzkirk plan were still peppering our comments last week with promises of amazing wealth to come.
<br><br>
But, the story keeps getting worse.  Last week, Laptop Magazine, whose "best of show" award at CTIA the company had been leveraging for credibility, <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090808/1906025814.shtml">rescinded the award</a>, noting not just the questions raised by the various reports, but also Zer01's own promise to deliver them a working phone weeks ago.  It's been a week and Zer01 still hasn't taken down the award from its website, where it's prominently placed and promoted.  Oops.  But, a much bigger deal was that the company, once again, promised to start shipping the phones August 10th and to start paying the "sales commissions" to all those people who "earned" them via the MLM plan.  Of course, the week's almost over and no phones yet... <b>Update</b>: to be clear, these statements were made by Global Verge, but considering that they were the official marketing partner of Zer01, you have to think they would not promise delivery of the phones had Zer01 not told them they were ready.  Besides Zer01 has also been promising phones to people for weeks.
<br><br>
On top of that, Gohring has continued to dig into the story and reports that Global Verge appears to have <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/169920/zer01_service_still_vapor_distributors_emptyhanded.html" target="_new">fired a bunch of execs</a>, including the one who was promising that the phones and commissions would be delivered this week.  Now that he's no longer working there, he says that "it'll be a miracle" if they actually pay the commissions.  There are also lots of questions about the supposed "reasons" for the delay.  One exec claimed the SIM cards need to be "defragged," though a SIM card expert Gohring spoke to had never heard of "defragging" a SIM.
<br><br>
But this morning, the story got even more odd.  First, Zer01 blasted out a press release announcing that it had <a href="http://www.fiercewireless.com/press-releases/zer01-mobile-dissolves-business-partnership-buzzirk-mobile" target="_new">dissolved the relationship with Global Verge</a>.  I'm not quite sure what that means for all those "associates" who have paid up a bunch of money, but I'd bet it means despite their eager insistence, they won't be seeing those phones any time soon.
<br><br>
From there, however, Zer01 uses the press release to bash everyone who has been reporting on this story and to threaten legal action against all of us:
<blockquote><i>
During the three-month business relationship between Zer01 Mobile and Buzzirk Mobile, questions by the general public and journalists were raised about the business agreement and Buzzirk Mobile's ability as a distributor. "Overall, there were a number of news articles and blogs that misreported a lot of the facts about each company and its services," commented Ron Dresner, Zer01 Mobile spokesperson. First, Zer01 Mobile and Buzzirk Mobile are two very separate and distinct companies, only joined by this now dissolved agreement. Previous reports erred in applying facts about the questionable background of Buzzirk Mobile executives to Zer01 Mobile team members; Second, industry 'insiders' commented about the new Zer01 Mobile service stating their doubts about the credibility of the service because no details about the interconnect agreements were released. From the start, Zer01 Mobile stated that it needed to protect and honor the confidentiality of its business partners and could not release this information. It has invited any and all industry 'insiders' to visit with Zer01 Mobile at any of the upcoming industry conferences and use a Zer01 Mobile phone; Third, Zer01 Mobile has never promoted or mentioned facts regarding its service that were misleading. News reports specifically quoted Buzzirk Mobile sales associates sources as to communication speed rates and frequencies; and fourth, questions about Zer01 Mobile's patent pending technology in the news are totally unfounded and motivated by marketplace competitors. Any visit to the patent office will prove Zer01 Mobile's VMC technology registration."
<br><br>
"We hope that our actions and statements put many concerns to rest. We believe that statements made publicly about the nature of our relationship with certain entities and the legitimacy of our mobile products by certain third parties are erroneous and untrue and are not based upon sufficient knowledge of the facts involved. Currently, our counsel is in the process of preparing a response to these false and misleading statements. Our company reserves all its legal rights and remedies that may arise from any and all erroneous and untrue statements made by third parties. We consider the reputation and integrity of Zer01 Mobile to be of utmost importance to our future success and we intend to vigilantly defend it," concluded Dascotte.
</i></blockquote>
Well, well, well.  So it seems that part one of the plan is to throw Buzzkirk/Global Verge under the bus.  That's a good step -- though they haven't explained why it didn't happen back when the problems were first reported on.  The rest, however, simply raises more questions.  In mocking the so-called 'insiders' who are welcome to use a phone at any upcoming industry conference, it ignores the fact that Derek <i>tried to do exactly that at CTIA</i> and was <i>not allowed</i>.  It also doesn't explain why it's failed to deliver promised test units to reporters like those at Laptop magazine.  If the phones really are ready, why are they only ready at trade shows?  In another part of the press release, Zer01 insists the reason it can't explain its wireless network agreements is due to confidentiality agreements.  That's nice... except that the two national GSM providers both have denied working with Zer01.  Perhaps they have other agreements in place, but given all the other questions raised without answers, hiding behind "confidentiality agreements" isn't particularly convincing.
<br><br>
As for the patents, that's a nice dodge as well.  First of all, it's quite easy to file a provisional patent, so we don't doubt that the company may have filed something.  But we asked what that patent application was for, and notice that it doesn't respond.  All it says is that we can find out if we visit the patent office.  The thing is, the questions are on Zer01's side, and they could put this all to rest by actually showing the application to people.
<br><br>
Finally, if the company really believes that its reputation and integrity are of the utmost importance, rather than threatening reporters and industry folks who have questioned them, why not... um... actually prove them wrong?  If Xer01 actually comes out with a phone and service that does what they promised it would do, it would be quite newsworthy, and we'd be more than happy to write it up and retract the earlier questions raised about the service.  But attacking those who raised those questions -- which the company still hasn't answered, other than with its passive aggressive attacks in this press release -- we're still left wondering why the company won't actually answer those questions.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090813/1039415865.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090813/1039415865.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090813/1039415865.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>well,-let's-see-now</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090813/1039415865</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:34:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Laptop Magazine Rescinds 'Best Of Show' Award For Zer01</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090808/1906025814.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090808/1906025814.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last month, our own Derek Kerton wrote a long post detailing many of the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1746225615.shtml">questions raised</a> by the overhyped mobile service startup Zer01, which appeared to be making a bunch of claims that it couldn't live up to (some of which were impossible) and failed to substantiate a bunch of other claims.  Oh, on top of that, Nancy Gohring uncovered that it was involved in a <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135692/Zer01_s_mobile_offer_Too_good_to_be_true_" target="_new">sketchy multi-level marketing scheme</a> run by a guy who is currently on probation after pleading guilty to securities fraud, and who's been known to have run similar sketchy MLM schemes.  The whole thing was incredibly questionable (though, there were a few true believers -- i.e., people who'd already dumped a lot of money into the scheme) who continued to insist it was real.  The <i>one</i> bit of support those folks seemed to have was that LAPTOP Magazine -- a well-known and well-trusted tech publication, had given Zer01 a "Best of CTIA" award.  Except... that's now gone.  Last week, LAPTOP <a href="http://blog.laptopmag.com/laptop-rescinds-best-of-ctia-award-for-zer01-mobile" target="_new">rescinded the award for the first time in its history</a>, noting not just the ethical questions raised by others, but the fact that the company did not live up to much of what it had promised the magazine.  That included a promise from Zer01's CEO right after the initial allegations came out that he would send them a phone to test by the following week.  One of the big concerns is that no one has been able to actually test one of these phones.  But the phone never showed up.  LAPTOP concludes its retraction saying:
<blockquote><i>
At this time we can only urge extreme caution to those interested in using or selling Zer01's service.
</i></blockquote>
And, yet, the "true believers" (some might assume "suckers") continue to show up in our comments insisting that this magic phone service is <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20090721/1746225615#c797">almost here</a>.  But exactly <i>none</i> of them has responded to Derek's original call, to find someone who's actually used a phone, noted where the company's engineers are located, where its towers are, who the network provider is and what the supposed patents are.  Until someone can actually answer all those questions, it's pretty difficult to assume there's anything at all here.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090808/1906025814.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090808/1906025814.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090808/1906025814.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>taking-it-back</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090808/1906025814</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:02:52 PDT</pubDate>
<title>The Zer01 Story: Lots Of Buzz, But Is It Actually Real...?</title>
<dc:creator>Derek Kerton</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1746225615.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1746225615.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>A disruptive mobile phone company <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/mobility/smart_phones/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=218400037" target="_blank">claims to have launched on July 1</a>. It's called Zer01, and if on the level, would radically incite price competition in the US cellular market. Zer01 is an MVNO or MVNE (depending on when you spoke with them), and they say that they can offer cheap unlimited service by the 3G GSM cellular data network of a national partner, which they will resell. Voice services would be delivered as data using VoIP.  Zer01 launched with unlimited voice, text, and data plans for $79.95 a month - including tethering your laptops all you want, and with no contract. The problem is: there is no evidence that this service actually exists. Nancy Gohring at ComputerWorld <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/comments/node/9135692#comment-533123" target="_blank">digs in to the story</a>, and found a lot of reasons to be suspicious about the company. Added all together, it looks pretty shady, and reminds us of the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20051024/1824230.shtml" target="_blank">Gizmondo scandal</a> back in 2005.</p>

<p>But a few people in the comments of Gohring's article said Gohring pulled a hatchet job on a legit young company. They argue that many young companies start out looking rough around the edges. "Where was Microsoft&#39;s headquarters when they launched?" Perhaps some young companies do look this <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7474107.stm" target="_blank">sketchy at the onset</a>, but not the hundreds of startups that I've seen and evaluated in my career! And certainly not any company that has a serious shot at taking on the national Tier-1 cellular carriers, head-on. If you want to battle with Verizon Wireless, nationwide, for data, voice, and support services, your business needs to look a far sight more established than a startup with a mailbox in a Vegas strip mall. If you claim patented technologies, devices, a customized On Device Portal, then you should have a team of engineers on staff somewhere, and the USPTO should be aware of your patent. SK Telecom and Earthlink launched an MVNO, Helio, which failed at taking on the big carriers despite the track record of being the #1 carrier in South Korea, and a decent kick off investment of <a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/04/sk-telecom-earthlink-dump-200-million-on-helio/" target="_blank">$440M, then $200M more</a>, then <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/21/earthlink-pulling-back-from-helio-sk-telecom-to-invest-an-additional-270-million/" target="_blank">$270M more</a>. But OK, let's suspend disbelief just a bit longer: Maybe a small, scrappy company is just shrewd enough to win where others have failed. I want to believe, too. But after interviewing Zer01, I just can't buy into the dream.</p>

<p>I interviewed Zer01 CEO, Ben Piilani at CTIA this year (April Fool's Day). I was lured by their PR release about their plan, which sounded incredible. But after our half-hour interview, my parting words were &quot;Good luck to you, but sign me up as skeptical.&quot; During our chat, Piilani said lots of things that struck me, as an experienced telecom analyst, as... um... wrong. Here are just three parts of the interview:</p>

<ol>
<li> Piilani told how, in delivering wireless data to phones, the wireless part of the connection is the easiest part to handle, and since ZER01 uses its own fiber backhaul network, but only uses the Wireless Carrier for that easy wireless jump, host carriers don't mind the impact because there is ample capacity. I thought, "Wha? That doesn't fit with all <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/167391/3GTests.html" target="_blank">the research</a> coming out saying that wireless capacity is being pinched. Nor does it jibe that the carriers just spent $Billions at the spectrum auctions for access to more cellular channels.&quot; But then Piilani went on, &quot;You know that in Europe, data is basically free. You can show up in the airport and buy a SIM card, slap it in your phone, and the data is unlimited.&quot; Um... I thought, &quot;I was in Europe last month for MWC, and at least once a year for the past 10 years. And as a wireless data analyst, I've bought about 20 of the SIM cards he's talking about. I&#39;m pretty sure I would know if there were an unlimited data, SIM-only option.&quot; 
<br /><br />
As anyone in telecom knows, there is not. I thought to myself: &quot;How odd that he would say such an absolute falsehood. And odder still that he does not know enough about the cellular industry to understand how obviously false he sounds.&quot; </li>
<br /><br />
<li> I wanted, most of all, to see the proof in the pudding. I wanted to make a call over the company's VoIP over 3G solution. I asked Ben if I could make such a test call, and he said sure, and hooked me up with a Product Manager at the end of our interview. I asked if we could place a call, but the PM began instead by showing me the phone&#39;s fancy looking On Device Portal (ODP) UI running on WinMo. He was explaining the great UI and all the apps that were to be included. So I said, "Click on one or two of those nice-looking icons and show me the apps." I picked the icons, and behind every one was an &quot;under construction&quot; response. He picked a couple, and there were some deeper pages. But the ODP was basically window dressing with nothing inside.</li>
<br /><br />
<li> So I pushed, and said, &quot;Mr. Piilani sent me over here to make a phone call on your device. Let's call my phone.&quot; He replied, &quot;Oh, sorry. Our PR firm told us not to make any calls on the show floor, because the wireless signal here is so unreliable with so many people using it.&quot; Odd that Mr. Piilani wasn't aware! I said, &quot;Sure, but the carriers have all put <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cell_on_wheels" target="_blank">COWS</a> onsite, and no one is having signal problems this year. Look there&#39;s one guy talking on his phone right there, and my phone is four bars.&quot; He said, &quot;Well, PR told me not to.&quot; I thought, "Fail." </li>
</ol>

<p>I left with serious doubts about Zer01's ability to deliver on their promises, and some suspicion that they might not be on the level.  Piilani and his team must have impressed someone, though, because they ended up wining a <a href="http://www.laptopmag.com/review/cell-phones/best-of-ctia-2009.aspx?pid=11" target="_new"><i>Best In Show</i></a> award from Laptop Magazine, and getting praise from some analysts, even while at least a <a href="http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2009/03/zer01-uses-voip-for-ersatz-unlimited-mobile-calls-plus-data.ars" target="_new">few others</a> were more suspicious.  Gohring's much more thorough recent investigation pretty much blows the top off of this story, though.   Gohring suggests that Zer01 bears some resemblance to a pyramid scheme, where the real money comes from an ever growing network of distributors or "e-affiliates" who pay money for the right to resell the service. In fact, Zer01 is sold through a network of "e-affiliates" using a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-level_marketing" target="_blank">Multi-Level Marketing</a> (MLM) setup managed by two other companies, Buzzirk and Global Verge. The Buzzirk cost of entry and compensation schemes incent distributors to join in at $150 the first month, and then $100 monthly thereafter. There are lower join levels, but they don't offer the MLM revenue benefits. For their money, distributors gain the right to a lookalike e-affiliate website that appears... <a href="http://www.mygvbiz.com/swilsonmarketing/" rel="nofollow">ahem</a>...<a href="http:/www.mygvbiz.com/richerlife/" rel="nofollow">bush</a> <a href="http://www.iambuzzirknow.com/" rel="nofollow">league</a>, and the right to sell the phones... which haven't actually appeared yet. Zer01 itself claims a network of 50,000 distributors. Assuming that is so, MLM revenues could be over $7M in just the first month -- but that's got nothing to do with actual service revenues.</p>

<p>For an example, check out <a href="http://www.mymilliondollarbiz.com/" rel="nofollow">"Robin and Jerry's" e-affiliate website</a>, replete with photos of the phones they haven't touched yet. The pictures are of standard Windows Mobile devices, and it's interesting to note that the UI shown is either MSFT generic, or the product of (totally legit) German software company Spb Software House.  Funny that they're using Spb's images to sell Zer01 instead of <i>actual</i> Zer01/Buzziker screens. Since the phones aren't available, the only thing the MLM websites really sell is a position as a distributor, lower down the food chain.</p>

<p>The MLM world is infamous for its own jargon. Buzzirk is no exception with a "3x9 matrix with vertical and horizontal compression." Most of the distributors defending the scheme at <a href="http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=119076" target="_blank">scam.com</a> were saying they would find vindication when the "Triple Diamonds" got the phones. Triple Diamonds are those e-affiliates who have recruited at least 25 active e-affiliates under them, and they are the elites who are expected to get the phones first, and can finally validate whether there is any reality to the story or not. So far, the Triple-Diamonds are only getting delays from Buzzirk and Zer01.</p>

<p>So, is this whole thing legit? Will there be phones? Is it a pyramid scheme, or just MLM?</p>

<p>In the US, a pyramid scheme is illegal, and is defined by an utter lack of product, and a focus on the recruitment of additional distributors instead of product sales. But since Zer01 is a separate legal entity from the MLM distribution companies, they can't be accused of a pyramid scheme -- they simply sell their phones to 'entirely separate companies'... with similar office locations. Meanwhile, Buzzirk and Global Verge, despite recruiting their e-affiliates with a focus on the mobile phone offering, also are clear that they offer other products that their e-affiliates can sell, such as a "water saver," a "power saver," and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090528/0243215040.shtml">"identity theft protection."</a> Thus, it is possible that the phones will never arrive, Zer01 will say "Sorry, just couldn't pull it off," and blame it on Ma Bell. Buzzirk and Global Verge can say, "Sorry, e-affiliates, no phones. Thanks for the fees, but stick around to sell the water saver," thus, engaging in legal MLM, not a pyramid. This paragraph is certainly just speculation, but cautious investors might want to investigate further whether the mobile phone service is just an oasis to lure them into an expensive "water saver" MLM franchise.</p>

<p>I've seen all forms of wacky claims made by Zer01 re-sellers while researching this post. I've read how it roams from AT&#038;T, to T-Mobile, to Rogers, to TELUS (with no mention of the fact that TELUS uses CDMA networks not supported by the phones they offer). I've read that it will work in airplanes, that "it's got the 2100MHz speed," that you can download a movie to your laptop in 3 minutes, that it includes SMS MasterCard mobile payment, and that it uses "the proprietary patented technology that Zer01 has that allows your phone to switch from GSM, Tri-Band, Quad-Band, Wi-Fi to connect to the VoIP," that it's 4G, that it's 5G and that it offers 20Gbps on a private FTC-licensed 2100MHz network.  The claims range from the improbable to the technologically incoherent or both. <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/comments/node/9135692#comment-533083" target="_blank">The company leaders suggest</a> that this is caused by confusion, and overzealous distributors. Perhaps some clear, correct, and well-presented franchiser information would abrogate the need for the creation of falsities? When so many of the e-affiliates are lying, I think the company at the center still deserves at least some of the blame. Besides, much of the gibberish is right off the Buzzirk franchised website, like "Internet speeds will range across GPRS, EGPRS, EDGE, and even 3G when available." Someone should have told these telecom experts that EGPRS and EDGE are exactly the same thing.</p>

<p>There will surely be Zer01/Buzzirk/Global Verge defenders popping up in the comments, some from the companies, others that just disagree, and some from the 50k &quot;distributors&quot; who have already been convinced to re-sell Zer01.  There is a whole army of people out there who, once fooled, have pride, <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20031223/2323208.shtml">cognitive dissonance</a>, and personal financial interest in defending Zer01. Comment away, call me a hack, and exercise polite free speech. But please also make your case: offer your telecom credentials if you have any, tell us where the Zer01 engineers are, what the special technology is, where the towers are erected for that proprietary 2100MHz network, who the network provider is, how standard HTC phones can push 20 Gbps of data with just a SIM card upgrade, where the claimed patents are, with whom Zer01 has Mobile Network Operator contracts, and if you have used one of the Zer01 devices <i><b>personally</b></i> and can vouch that they exist, and work (and aren't just AT&#038;T SIM phones with an ODP). </p><br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1746225615.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1746225615.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090721/1746225615.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>evidence-lacking</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090721/1746225615</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>