<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
<title>Techdirt. Stories about &quot;boxee&quot;</title>
<description>Easily digestible tech news...</description>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:16:58 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Boxee Ramps Up Its Fight To Stop The FCC From Letting Cable Companies Effectively Break Its Device</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120321/04534918181/boxee-ramps-up-its-fight-to-stop-fcc-letting-cable-companies-effectively-break-its-device.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120321/04534918181/boxee-ramps-up-its-fight-to-stop-fcc-letting-cable-companies-effectively-break-its-device.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Last month, an interesting fight broke out concerning the cable companies' desire to block out competing set top boxes.  The simplified version is that the cable companies asked the FCC for a waiver to allow them to encrypt basic cable signals -- something they're currently forbidden from doing.  The cable companies insist they need to do this to "stop piracy" (of course).  But, the reality is that this is an end run to lock people into specific cable company set top boxes (for which they hope to charge you) and away from newer, more innovative solutions.  At the center of this fight has been Boxee, the <a href="http://gigaom.com/video/boxee-fcc-clear-qam/" target="_blank">maker of an innovative device</a> for making your TV better, by letting you access and watch internet video via the device.  It recently <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2012/01/24/boxee-live-tv-software-update/" target="_blank">launched</a> a new product that lets users add live local network TV to their Boxee -- but that could be cut off if the waiver goes through, since those channels would then be encrypted.
<br /><br />
Public Knowledge has been fighting the FCC on this for a while and has an <a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/cable-encryption" target="_blank">action page</a> to let you send a note to the FCC about your concerns with this policy change.  From all the indications and scuttlebutt around DC, it seems clear that the FCC has been leaning towards approving this waiver, though realizing that it would kill off an innovative product like Boxee has taken the commissioners by surprise.
<br /><br />
Of course, this just highlights the dangers of having politicians make declarations that impact technologies -- especially when they appear to be wholly unfamiliar with the state of the art or the general trend lines of where the technology is heading.  They make "simple" decisions without realizing the massive impact such decisions can have.
<br /><br />
Boxee has ramped up its offensive against this effort by the cable companies, recently sending out an email urging supporters to voice their concerns with the FCC via the PK action page linked above:
<blockquote><i>
Cable companies want to increase the cable bills of millions of Americans and to virtually eliminate competition from third party devices like Boxee. We want you to know because it will affect millions of people, non-Boxee and Boxee users alike, and we need your help to fight it.   
<br /><br />
For the past several months, Boxee has been forced into a legislative battle with cable companies. Right now, anyone can get basic tier cable. Attach your TV, computer, or Boxee Live TV tuner and everything just works. Cable companies want the federal government to end that, and to require every user to have ALL of their TVs attached to cable boxes. We&#8217;re concerned many users who have Live TV tuners and rely on basic cable will be hurt by this, but we&#8217;re also focused on how the issue goes far beyond Boxee.  
<br /><br />
Here are the effects of the rule:
<br /><br />
1. It could more than DOUBLE the cost for the typical new basic cable subscriber.
<br /><br />
2. If you have a TV that&#8217;s hooked up to cable without a box, you MUST rent a set top box for that TV.  
<br /><br />
3. If your computer&#8217;s TV tuner is connected to your cable connection without a box, it will no longer work unless it uses a CableCARD.
<br /><br />
4. If you bought a DVR that does not include a CableCARD it will no longer work without an antenna.  If you don&#8217;t get signal with the antenna, your DVR is now worthless. 
</i></blockquote>
It should come as no surprise, of course, that cable companies are seeking to limit consumer choice and better control the market, and even less surprise that they're doing so by making "piracy" claims (next it'll be "for the children!") but that's no reason that the FCC has to simply roll over and break innovative devices and services like Boxee's.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120321/04534918181/boxee-ramps-up-its-fight-to-stop-fcc-letting-cable-companies-effectively-break-its-device.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120321/04534918181/boxee-ramps-up-its-fight-to-stop-fcc-letting-cable-companies-effectively-break-its-device.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120321/04534918181/boxee-ramps-up-its-fight-to-stop-fcc-letting-cable-companies-effectively-break-its-device.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>is-this-about-piracy-or-fighting-competition</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20120321/04534918181</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:33:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Hulu Continues To Shoot Self In Foot: Blocks More Browsers</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100323/0211188667.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100323/0211188667.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ Hulu, at the behest of its corporate masters, continues to shoot itself in the foot and make it an increasingly less useful platform.  Last year, Hulu got a lot of attention for <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml">blocking Boxee</a>, a specialized browser to show internet video on a computer-connected television.  Hulu was apologetic about it, but admitted that it was pressured to do this by its owners (though, NBC boss Jeff Zucker appears to have <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100204/1810198057.shtml">lied to Congress</a> about NBC's role in this).  However, it didn't stop there.  Hulu, it seems, is hellbent on trying to block any browser it doesn't like from showing its content.  It's <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090717/0103505577.shtml">blocked the PS3's browser</a> and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090915/0430416199.shtml">mobile browsers</a> as well.
<br /><br />
The latest is that it wasted almost no time before <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2010/03/hillcrests_kylo_browser_latest.html" target="_blank">blocking the new Kylo browser</a> from Hillcrest labs that, like Boxee, was designed to better format the content for television.
<br /><br />
This is typical short-sighted thinking from the likes of NBC bosses who are bizarrely afraid that people might <i>watch authorized television shows on their television</i>.  Of course, the real fear is that if people start doing this, the cable and satellite companies might start losing business, meaning that they'll pay a lot less to NBC to carry their shows.  This is such typical thinking from NBC execs, who seem to go out of their way to pretend that they can hold people back from doing what they want, because it doesn't agree with NBC's increasingly obsolete business model.  So instead of letting people watch <i>authorized</i> content, with very high paying advertising, they're instead driving people to get the content through unauthorized means.  It's bizarre that anyone could think this is a smart idea -- but, then again, we're talking about NBC management here.  They think that downloading movies is <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070621/004352.shtml">hurting the American corn farmer</a>... so logic has never really been a strong suit.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100323/0211188667.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100323/0211188667.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100323/0211188667.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>lemme-explain-how-the-internet-works...</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100323/0211188667</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:58:00 PST</pubDate>
<title>NBC Universal Boss Jeff Zucker Lies To Congress About Boxee</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100204/1810198057.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100204/1810198057.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ NBC Universal management gets more and more ridiculous every time we come across anything they do.  While they've left most of the more ridiculous statements to their chief lawyer, Rick Cotton (who is worried about the <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20070621/004352.shtml">poor corn farmers</a> harmed by movie file sharing), CEO Jeff Zucker has made his fair share of whoppers.  While he got a lot of attention last month for his cowardly handling of the whole Leno/Conan mess, his latest move is to flat out lie to Congress.  In a hearing in front of Congress as a part of NBC's effort to merge with Comcast, Rep. Rick Boucher asked Zucker about Hulu being forced to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml">block Boxee</a> (a battle that's gone <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090401/1457094342.shtml">back and forth</a> a few times).  When the whole thing started, Hulu management was very upfront about how they were pressured by their content partners like NBC to block Boxee, which is just another browser.  It was quite clear that Hulu didn't want to do the block, but had no choice due to pressure from the likes of partial owner NBC:
<blockquote><i>
Our content providers requested that we turn off access to our content via the Boxee product, and we are respecting their wishes....
<br /><br />
The maddening part of writing this blog entry is that we realize that there is no immediate win here for users. Please know that we take very seriously our role of representing users such that we are able to provide more and more content in more and more ways over time. We embrace this activity in ways that respect content owners' -- and even the entire industry's -- challenges to create great content that users love. Yes, it's a complex matter. A tough mission, and a never-ending one, but one we are passionately committed to.
<br /><br />
For those Boxee users reading this post, we understand and appreciate that you're likely to tell us that we're nuts. Please know that we do share the same interests and won't stop innovating in support of the bigger mission. 
</i></blockquote>
So how did Zucker respond when asked about it by Congressman Rick Boucher?  He <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/02/04/boxee-responds-to-nbcs-jeff-zuckers-misleading-statements-to-congress-re-hulu-boxee-relationship/" target="_blank"><i>blamed Hulu</i> for making the decision, and falsely claimed that Boxee illegally access Hulu content</a>:
<blockquote><i>
<b>Rep. Rick Boucher (D-VA):</b> What about Boxee? Mr. Zucker you probably are in a better position to answer that. Did Hulu block the Boxee users from access to the Hulu programs?
<br /><br />
<b>Zucker (NBC):</b> This was a decision made by the Hulu management to, uh, what Boxee was doing was illegally taking the content that was on Hulu without any business deal. And, you know, all, all the, we have several distributors, actually many distributors of the Hulu content that we have legal distribution deals with so we don't preclude distribution deals. What we preclude are those who illegally take that content.
</i></blockquote>
Of course, that's a flat out wrong, as Boxee was not illegally "taking" the content at all.  Boxee is a browser, like Firefox.  If what Boxee does is illegal so is accessing Hulu with Firefox or IE.  But it's even worse than that, because last year, in a different situation, <a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/2881" target="_blank">Zucker admitted that he had been a part of the decision makers</a> to have Hulu block Boxee, telling Kara Swisher that "our vision" was to block Boxee in an effort to keep "Hulu being an online experience" rather than one you could access via a TV.
<br /><br />
So why would Zucker flat out lie during a Congressional hearing, and throw Hulu under the bus while doing so?  Does he not understand how Boxee works?  Did he forget his own dealings with Hulu?  Or is he just making stuff up in a Congressional hearing?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100204/1810198057.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100204/1810198057.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100204/1810198057.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>but-what-about-the-corn-farmers</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20100204/1810198057</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:59:00 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Content Owners Force Hulu To Block Mobile Browsers As Well</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090915/0430416199.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090915/0430416199.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ I still can't figure out the reasons why content owners allowed Hulu to offer up TV shows in a browser... but then absolutely flipped out when they realized that the very same content can be seen on browsers on other devices as well.  In the past, we've noted that Hulu was pressured to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml">block the Boxee browser</a> (which lets you view content on your TV) and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090717/0103505577.shtml">the PS3's browser</a> (also for TVs).  Now, via <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/profile.php?u=hamill8152">hamill8152</a>, we learn that Hulu <a href="http://www.wmexperts.com/skyfire-explains-why-you-cant-watch-hulu" target="_new">is also blocking content on Skyfire</a>, a mobile browser for Windows Mobile phones.  The reasoning is the same as always (and, at the very least, kudos to Hulu for being upfront about the idiotic pressure it comes under from clueless content owners).  Hulu explains the whole "windowing" thought process of the folks in Hollywood, and suggests that these windows will eventually go away.  Of course, it's worth pointing out that Hollywood so disagrees with this that the MPAA has been pushing for ways to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090903/0312496093.shtml">add more windows</a>.  Either way, the whole thing is silly.  If you're putting your content on the internet, you're putting it on the internet.  Pretending that televisions or mobile phones can't also view content on the internet makes no sense.  One day, people in charge will understand this.  Until then...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090915/0430416199.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090915/0430416199.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090915/0430416199.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>seriously?</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090915/0430416199</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 Apr 2009 01:43:07 PDT</pubDate>
<title>Hulu Tries (And Fails) To Up The Arms War Against Boxee</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090401/1457094342.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090401/1457094342.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ To be honest, we're still quite confused as to why Hulu's content partners think it makes sense to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml">stop Boxee</a> from showing Hulu videos.  If you don't know, Boxee is basically a web browser for your television.  If you have a computer hooked up to your TV, you can watch Hulu (and other) videos.  You could do it via any browser you want -- including Firefox or IE -- but Boxee is designed to function better for TVs.  Yet, for some reason, even though it's just a browser, Hulu's content partners freaked out and demanded Boxee stop.  Since then, there's been a bit of a technology <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090306/1224474023.shtml">back and forth</a>, with Boxee offering workarounds, and Hulu trying to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090308/1504274035.shtml">block Boxee's workaround</a> (which Boxee got around quickly again).  The latest, as pointed out by a few readers, is that Hulu is now trying to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/01/hulu-begins-encrypting-html-content-to-thwart-non-browser-apps/" target="_new">encrypt its content to keep it from working in non-browser apps</a>.  Of course, Boxee on the Mac <i>is</i> just like a browser, so the encryption doesn't even do anything -- and Boxee is planning to upgrade its software on other platforms to do the same thing.  Honestly, though, the whole thing seems like a waste.  Hulu is dedicating technical resources towards making its content less useful, and trying to stop people from using the content in perfectly reasonable ways.  That's a recipe for failure.  Even if the company is only doing this to appease angry content partners, you have to wonder how Hulu can possibly <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090223/0055373860.shtml">survive</a> while sitting between content providers who want to lock everything down, and users who want to do the opposite.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090401/1457094342.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090401/1457094342.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090401/1457094342.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>this-will-end-badly</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090401/1457094342</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Mar 2009 01:16:31 PDT</pubDate>
<title>The Hulu/Boxee Battle Continues To Go Back And Forth</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090308/1504274035.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090308/1504274035.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ On Friday morning, we wrote that Boxee had come up with a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090306/1224474023.shtml">workaround</a> to get Hulu content accessible again via Boxee.  Basically, it just started accessing the content via Hulu's RSS feed: which is <i>exactly</i> how the RISS feed was meant to be used.  It's just that the Boxee software would act as the "reader" of choice.  It was difficult to see how Hulu could complain without appearing ridiculous: it would effectively have to say that only certain RSS readers could use it's feed... and that's exactly what the company did.  By Friday evening, <a href="http://blog.boxee.tv/2009/03/06/the-trials-and-tribulations-of-innovation/" target="_new">Hulu had a technical block in place</a>.  Of course, it didn't take long for Boxee to figure out a workaround to that block, and supposedly (at the time I'm writing this) the service is back -- though, Boxee has now added a little indicator to its software to let you know whether Hulu is accessible or not...
<br /><br />
Everyone knows that Hulu's content partners are actively trying to block Boxee, but it's extremely difficult to see what their complaint is.  Boxee is simply a different browser, accessing the content <i>exactly</i> as the companies <i>offered it</i>.  Users of Boxee can still access Hulu on their computer, it's just in a less friendly UI.  All this really does is make plenty of legitimate TV watchers decide to go elsewhere for the content. It simply makes no sense to say Boxee can't access Hulu.  It would be like CNN denying mobile web browsers from accessing its site.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090308/1504274035.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090308/1504274035.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090308/1504274035.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>give-it-up-hulu</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090308/1504274035</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:37:51 PST</pubDate>
<title>Boxee Routes Around Hulu Ban</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090306/1224474023.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090306/1224474023.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ We were among those surprised and confused by content providers trying to <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml">prevent Boxee</a> from accessing Hulu content.  If you don't know, Boxee is basically an interface for watching video content from the internet on your TV.  You hook up a computer to your television and effectively use Boxee as a more TV friendly browser.  As part of the list of internet content you could view, Hulu was a popular option, but Hulu's content partners protested -- perhaps because they're <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090220/0838163840.shtml">negotiating with cable companies</a> on exclusive internet rights.  But, there seemed to be absolutely no <i>legal reason</i> to stop Boxee from offering the content.  After all, Boxee was just a browser for the content, like Firefox or IE or Safari.
<br /><br />
Well, now it looks like Boxee is trying to push the matter a bit.  It hasn't re-enabled access to Hulu exactly, but it has  <a href="http://blog.boxee.tv/2009/03/06/new-version-hulu-update/" target="_new">launched an RSS reader that will handle video</a>, including Hulu's own RSS feeds.  It's not a perfect solution, but effectively Boxee is pointing out to Hulu and its content partners, that they've made the content available for consuming, and all Boxee users are doing is consuming it as offered.  It will certainly be interesting to see how Hulu responds...<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090306/1224474023.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090306/1224474023.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090306/1224474023.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>this-ought-to-be-fun</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090306/1224474023</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
<item>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:07:26 PST</pubDate>
<title>Hollywood Shoots Itself In The Foot... Again; Removes Content From Boxee</title>
<dc:creator>Mike Masnick</dc:creator>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml</link>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml</guid>
<description><![CDATA[ I've been hearing such wonderful things about Boxee lately that I had actually been meaning to test it out in the next few weeks.  It makes it quite easy to view internet content over your television -- helping to bridge that "final gap" between the internet and your television.  Boxee has done a nice job integrating a variety of different legal online video services so you can watch them all via your TV.  Obviously, one of the big ones was Hulu, which provides video streams of some of the most popular shows on television.  There are some dumb limitations associated with Hulu -- including <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20081203/1933253017.shtml">geographic restrictions</a> and <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090123/0653453498.shtml">music licensing restrictions</a> -- but for those who can use Hulu it actually works quite well (surprising for an offering set up by NBC Universal and News Corp.).  The folks at Hulu have actually been pretty upfront in explaining the limitations and their own frustrations in dealing with some of the very content providers who funded them in knocking down some of the more idiotic restrictions.
<br /><br />
However, now it appears those content providers have shot themselves in the foot again.  Christopher Froehlich alerts us to the news that Hulu's content providers have <a href="http://blog.boxee.tv/2009/02/18/the-hulu-situation/" target="_new">demanded that Boxee stop streaming Hulu content</a> and Boxee is going to comply.  Hulu has a post on their own blog, where they <a href="http://blog.hulu.com/2009/2/18/doing-hard-things" target="_new">certainly sound quite apologetic about the whole thing</a>:
<blockquote><i>
The maddening part of writing this blog entry is that we realize that there is no immediate win here for users. Please know that we take very seriously our role of representing users such that we are able to provide more and more content in more and more ways over time. We embrace this activity in ways that respect content owners' -- and even the entire industry's -- challenges to create great content that users love. Yes, it's a complex matter. A tough mission, and a never-ending one, but one we are passionately committed to.
<br /><br />
For those Boxee users reading this post, we understand and appreciate that you're likely to tell us that we're nuts. Please know that we do share the same interests and won't stop innovating in support of the bigger mission.
</i></blockquote>
Kudos to Hulu and its CEO for at least explaining the issue in a human, rather than corporate-PR-speak way.  And, yes, it's the content providers who are nuts, rather than Hulu.  After all, wasn't the point of putting the content on Hulu to get more people to watch the content?  Why would they possibly try to make it more difficult for people to watch.  Oh, wait, we forgot.  NBC Universal thinks it's <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080915/0158272270.shtml">a good thing</a> to make their content hard to watch.
<br /><br />
  But, to be honest, it's difficult to see how there's even a claim at all by the content providers at all.  They put the content on Hulu so that anyone watching the content via the internet on a computer within the geographic restrictions should be fine.  Boxee is just an application on a computer.  It's functionally identical to watching the content on your computer screen.  The only real difference is that the "screen" is a television instead of a monitor.  But the <i>mechanism</i> is identical.  It's difficult to see how the content providers can claim any right whatsoever to say that you can watch the content that they purposely put online only on a specific type of screen.  I can understand Hulu not wanting to upset its content providers.  And I can understand Boxee not wanting to upset Hulu... but I can't see how those content providers have any legal right to make this request at all. 
<br /><br />
 Hell, I imagine users of Boxee (depending on their setup) can simply use the computer they already have hooked up to their TV to surf directly over to Hulu.  The interface might not be as nice, but they'll still get to see the content.  In those cases, it's not even about the screen -- but the <i>browser</i>.  It's perfectly legal for me to hook up my laptop to a TV, surf over to Hulu in Firefox and watch a show.  All Boxee does is put that into a different browser -- a better browser for TV.  Since when does any content provider get to say that it's okay to watch the content they put online in one browser, but not another?   In the end, what good at all does it do to ban Hulu on Boxee other than piss people off?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml#comments">Comments</a> | <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml?op=sharethis">Email This Story</a><br />
 ]]></description>
<slash:department>there's-stupid-and-then-there's-hollywood</slash:department>
<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techdirt.com/comment_rss.php?sid=20090218/1627113821</wfw:commentRss>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>