Rikuo's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the holiday-season-edition dept
Hey, fellow Techdirtians or whatever adjective you want to call yourselves. Longtime reader Rikuo here. I’ve been following Techdirt for the better part of two years now, and was sure surprised to have been asked to write the Favorites list for Xmas week. Once I stopped jumping and shrieking in pure fanboy excitement (and after the court injunction ordering me to never do that sort of stuff again), I sat myself down and decided to get serious.
Monday was a serious day for some, and a jawdropper for others. Daniel Castro from the ITIF (Information Technology and Innovation Foundation) just three weeks ago responded to SOPA/Protect IP critics by saying that DNS filtering works because some other countries do it. Well, thanks to the good folks at Public Knowledge, you learn that it’s alright for the United States of America to adopt practices from some of the worst authoritarian regimes on the planet. And here I thought "land of the free" actually meant something.
Two other Monday articles caught my eye: the first was about how ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement) was adopted by the EU Council, however, it was really by a collection of ministers in a meeting discussing agriculture and fisheries? Wait, what? What do fish have to do with a treaty about copyright?
The last Monday article was by our own Julian Sanchez, about how SOPA will be abused. This prediction was arrived at by looking at what the entertainment industry has done in the past and what they continue to do today. A very good read, as it really drives home the point that these companies are already abusing the DMCA. And having tried to block technological innovation in the past, they will certainly continue to do so in the future.
Tuesday had three articles that interested me. The first is about UK singer, Dan Bull, releasing his latest music video on YouTube. Even though he's in the UK, he'd still be affected by SOPA. Dan Bull relies on user-content-generated-sites to release his media but the entertainment industry would like to shut them all down (or at least limit them), given half a chance. Once that’s done, this artist, unless he got picked up by a label, would have no easy way of distributing his music.
The second article for Tuesday was about successful photographer Trey Ratcliff. He’s another member of the growing example of artists who succeed in the digital age despite the copyrights on his work regularly being infringed. In fact, he's worked it into his business model. What I found most amusing about the article were the responses from some people, who continue to state that these examples don't matter. We here at Techdirt are offering proof but these people willfully stay blind.
The last Tuesday article was about the death of Veoh, a video sharing website that, despite being perfectly legal, was killed financially in a bogus copyright lawsuit from Universal Music Group. Under the original version of SOPA, you wouldn't need a lawsuit. Just a stern letter to the payment processors and you get the same result. If you can already kill a legal website dead by overburdening it with lawsuits, why bother pushing for all this extra legislation?
Come, Wednesday and I hear about Gilberto Sanchez who has been sentenced to a year in prison for uploading the unfinished workprint of X-men Origins: Wolverine. Despite the fact no harm has been proven and despite the fact that uploading a workprint does NOT equal uploading a full finished movie, Fox still pushed for his imprisonment. All this will do is drive further resentment against copyright law, as people ask themselves why such a harsh punishment?
Again with the superhero movies, as the Dark Knight Rises movie trailer has gone viral. Now, people in the marketing division of Warner Bros want this video to be seen by as many people as possible, so as to entice more people to see the actual movie. However, the lawyers are a different breed and have sent Rob Sheridan a notice for daring to embed the video. So what... are we NOT allowed talk about the movie?
My last favorite Wednesday article would have made me chuckle if it didn't piss me off so much. The YouHaveDownloaded tool has been used to find out that IP addresses belonging to the RIAA have been used to infringe copyright. The RIAA has been too quick to say that it could have been a third party at fault, a defense that it never allowed anyone else to use during its infamous P2P lawsuits.
I came home from work Thursday and saw that Julian Sanchez had been hard at work, showing us how SOPA will enable censorship beyond that of copyright infringement. What truly amused and dumbfounded me were the commentators who still insisted that dajaz1.com was rogue and illegal, when clearly the government couldn't make such a case. Talk about a complete disconnect from reality.
Reddit General Manager released a statement showing how SOPA still impacts domestic sites. Even if it were true that SOPA would only ever be used against foreign sites, the logistical nightmares of censoring them (and the penalties for failing to do so) would fall on US companies.
I came home from work on Friday, booted up my browser and first place I went was Techdirt, where I learned that pretty much everybody who was listed as supporting SOPA have demanded to be taken off the list. Turns out, they were never asked whether or not they supported SOPA, or in GoDaddy's case, were facing a massive boycott from their customers. So SOPA supporters...where is this massive support you've been crowing about? Are SOPA critics still limited to pirates and thieves?
I'd like to thank Mike for giving me the opportunity to write this article and the Techdirt community for just being that awesome. I wish you all a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.


Re: Copyright in space raises a number of important issues
And you know the scary thing about this obviously ridiculous comment? It could very well happen, even the cut off communications part. Who cares if the method of communication is used for other more important reasons? It was used to violate COPY-FUCKING-RIGHT, and must die!
Re:
But Disney will say that since the astronaut is (more than likely will be) American, and so will the rocket and lander, that US style copyright law does apply. I can see the copyright maximilists rubbing their hands in glee at this prospect - they'll seeks to secure licences from Mars One, just in case, and given past behavior, I wouldn't be surprised if their licences cost so much that Mars One goes bankrupt.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ "Oh, you didn’t just say that."
He made a fucking movie, or did that prove too much for you to handle? He spent time, money and effort (just like your AA saints) to create a documentary on the Piratebay. Whether you think it's biased or not doesn't matter, the fact is he made speech of his own, that is now being threatened. He did express himself.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ "Oh, you didn’t just say that."
"Every artist is free to give their stuff away if they so choose."
And if every method that allows free distribution is destroyed in the 'AA's mad lust for control, like they say here http://torrentfreak.com/riaa-20-million-piracy-takedowns-sent-to-google-still-no-end-in-sight-130522 /
then how is an artist free to choose to give their stuff away for free?
Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ "Oh, you didn’t just say that."
Well, it's finally been said. The copyright loving troll has out and out said that the only artist is one who does it for money, not for love of the art or because he has something to say.
Let's forget the possibility of making money while not relying on the exclusion principle; let's ignore the possibility that many works are on the site deliberately with their creator's permission; nope, the only artist is a professional one, who needs to exclude as many people as possible from viewing his art and if his wish to exclude means that the little people's right and ability to make speech and art must be destroyed, that's a small price to pay.
Stand up and take a bow, Out_of_the_blue! You've earned it! Then exit stage left and kindly stay the fuck away from where you're not wanted.
Re: Re:
If so...then I'm not sorry to say, but he's an idiot. While his message is serious, and has serious implications and I support what he's saying...the fact his camera is acting like it's drunk detracts attention away from what he's saying. Twice while watching, I had to rewind because I focused more on the erratic movement of the camera than on what he was saying.
Re: What a whiney baby
I want to know how it's possible for a site that never deletes a torrent to take away speech. If you go on about how you can't make back money for your movie - that's a completely separate issue. Even if true, the movie has already been made, the speech has been spoken.
(untitled comment)
I do have to ask - what the fuck is going on with his camera?
Re: Re: Read for comprehension!
IF you want to apply for a job as editor at Techdirt, so you can correct these oh so horrible mistakes in one wrong word (in your eyes), apply via e-mail to Mike and send a glittering resume. However, please please please, don't come whinging here when (not if) you're rejected.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Here's what happened.
Prenda lawyers send out letters in an attempt to make cash.
Judge at one of the cases smells something fishy and, after many shenanigans, asks the Prenda team for their side of the tale, to try and defend themselves.
They say no.
They say they won't talk.
This is the end of due process for them, at least where they're concerned. They had ample opportunity to set the record straight, but willingly and knowingly said they won't talk. Therefore, the only evidence before Judge Wright and other judges, the only evidence before them that they could look at and rule on, was evidence that pointed to Prenda's guilt. By pleading the fifth, by not talking, Team Prenda didn't enter anything to contest that.
I'm not a lawyer and I'm able to understand that much. What about you?
Re:
"However, in the aftermath of Columbine shooting, school districts have to take a "zero tolerence" policy when it comes to juvenile antics "
Just like when two boys pointed fingers at each other and made gun noises? That's right, that's what really happened. Two boys pointed their fingers at each other, made noise, and were promptly suspended, thanks to zero tolerance. Do you support that too?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Mr Lawyer in Training - what does Taking the Fifth mean? Go on, tell me that.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes of course - internet subscribers being told that they are violating COPYRIGHT law cannot contest it, even though it invokes a law enforced by government, and was in fact a system heavily pushed by Joe Biden.
If there is no force of law behind six strikes, then the subscribers can rest easy, knowing that the accusations have no force and therefore, it would be illegal to arbitrarily restrict or cut off their internet service based on nothing more than an accusation.
If there is force of law behind Six Strikes, then you've got to include Due Process.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You care about everyone's due process rights? What about in all the articles leading up to Six Strikes, you were praising it as if it were a gift from God? There's no due process there, it's six accusations and you're out.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: just love you command of english
Yeah so? The point is, you were the guy originally bringing up grammar/spelling mistakes, while making plenty of his own. That means you have no standing.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Look here, folks. You heard it from Average_Joe. To be pro-copyright, you have to be equated to a group of thuggish lawyers who demand millions all over shoddy evidence and baseless threats. To him, that's what being pro-copyright is.
Re: Re: Re:
You ignore willingly that Hansmeier is suffering due to his own actions. He and the rest of the Prenda gang, PLED THE FIFTH. That was the end of their due process. They willingly and knowingly ended any attempts for them to tell their side of the story when they admitted that any attempts by them to do so would either catch them in a lie or truthfully reveal their abuses of the law.
Re: Re: Re:
Prenda wasn't pro-copyright. It was pro-"Try and abuse the legal system to rake in millions in the name of copyright".
Re: Re: Re:
No, we're "obsessed" over the many abuses of the legal system they were perpetrating, like shoddy evidence, baseless legal threats and ignoring orders from judges. Not that they're "anti-piracy".
Re: Re: Re:
Alan. Alan Cooper. A man, who is a caretaker and not a FEMALE singer.