John Fenderson's Favorite Techdirt Posts Of The Week
from the all-hail-eris dept
I've been hanging around Techdirt for a few years now, so hello to my old friends as well as new. One of the things I like the best about this place is that Techdirt is only a technology blog when looked at with one eye. It really covers the intersection of technology and culture. You may or may not know this about me, but I am a Discordian. We are in particularly chaotic times right now. Old systems and businesses are fighting to their death while new ones are discovering the world to be more complex than they supposed. All anyone can say with real confidence is that tomorrow will not look much like yesterday.
With chaos comes opportunity, however. It is during these times, when change is guaranteed but the nature of it is not, that we have a rare chance of shaping the nature of it. Big money corporate forces and a systemically corrupt government are consciously aware of this and are actively working at a fever pitch to shape it in their best interest. What they don't want you to know is that chaos is a great equalizer. Great power requires order to maintain it, but individuals do not. In times like this the playing field is closer to being level. It becomes possible for you, or I, to individually change things for the better. Collectively, we can change everything.
Let's look back at the last week and see what chaos had brought us.
Computers That Accurately Guess What Gangs Did What Crimes
I can tell you one of the most frequent things people misunderstand about chaos. Chaos is not randomness, or a kind of randomness. Chaos is actually order -- apparently disorganized order, but order nonetheless. Chaotic systems are those which are extremely sensitive to initial events. But chaotic systems are not necessarily unpredictable systems.
We, The People, Are Sarcastic And Not Easily Mollified By Bland Political Non-Answers
Not unpredictable at all.
Why PROTECT IP/SOPA Is The Exact Wrong Approach To Dealing With Infringement Online
That is, unless you are one of the greyfaces whose fear of change has caused blindness preventing the ability to see solutions that may be different than the old comfortable ones, but actually have a chance of working.
Lessons Learned From 'Pay What You Want'
Even when the solution might be counter to everything that you think is true.
A History Of Hyperbolic Overreaction To Copyright Issues: The Entertainment Industry And Technology
Even when an industry's entire history is riddled with examples of the same blindness.
Free As In Freedom: But Whose Freedom?
Richard Stallman, love him or hate him, has the admirable quality of being unafraid to give his unvarnished opinion on matters that interest him. Some might suspect him of insanity, communism, hippiness, or dementia, but they're all wrong. What he is is a firebrand, and like all firebrands he will invariably say something irritating or offensive to some people. Firebrands are an essential part of society. We need them to shake us out of our mental ruts and shock us into actively thinking out our positions, whether those positions agree with them or not. It's OK that he confuses fraud with copyright violation. Lots of people do.
Canadian Actor Claims Mashups Are Morally Wrong And Should Be Illegal
Leah Pinset gives us an interesting example of the process of forming chaos to shape reality. The reality she experiences and wants to make us all live in is one where she can declare certain types of music immoral because she doesn't like it much.
She's got lots of company. Here, we have RIAA doing the very same thing, but opposite:
RIAA Explains Its Interpretation Of SOPA; Which Doesn't Seem To Be Found In The Bill Itself
In this case, RIAA wants legislation that would do great harm to every aspect of society. No, I'm not talking about SOPA -- SOPA isn't what they want, it's what they're currently willing to compromise to. They know that what they actually want is a political nonstarter. It would be rejected handily by almost everybody. So they give us SOPA, which is exactly as egregious as they thought was politically possible. That looks less possible now, so they are taking the tack that the Justice Department wanted the ability to do: they are lying.
Justice Department Drops Its Request To Be Allowed To Lie In Response To FOIA Requests
Oh, here's the lying! The Justice department wanted to be able to legally lie to us about the mere existence of records that we citizens collectively own. They've changed their minds and are ok with having to lie about lying like they used to.
DOJ: Secret Interpretation Of PATRIOT Act Just Like Grand Jury Subpoena If You Ignore 'Factual Context'
It's not all untruthfulness, though. It's easier to avoid lying if you can just avoid talking about it. That "it" is the laws that you and I are supposed to be subject to, and therefore presumably should know about, is irrelevant.
Understanding Anonymous: The Culture Of Lulz
There's a law of nature recognized within Discordianism. It is simply this: nature seeks a balance between order and discord. When one grows too strong, the pendulum will always shift. For example, increased social disorder gives rise to grand displays of order through more oppressive laws and policing. And the other way around.
Building Company Realizes That Threatening A Blogger With Bogus Libel Suit Was A Bad Idea; Sincerely Apologizes
In small ways as well as big.
Despite Publisher Apprehension, Good Old Games Proves A Market For Old DRM-Free Games Exists
You can't compete with free? The hundreds I've spent at Good Old Games argue otherwise.
Barnes & Noble Claims That Microsoft Patent Shakedown Over Android Is An Antitrust Violation
I've done my share of software engineering contract work for large companies in the past, and one of the things I've learned is that being the outsider is a powerful position. The outsider can often speak truths that cannot be spoken by people who are invested in the company. The outsider can take radical action with less fear due to simple ignorance of the minefield they're walking through. Barnes & Noble is an outsider in this space and, as such, can take action that is simply impossible for the established players. I never thought I'd see Barnes & Noble as a force for positive change in my industry, but I'm not too surprised, really. It had to be someone I wouldn't have expected.
Really, unless you are in the 1% or are a large corporation, you are an outsider in the political world right now. Which means you have a chance to shape the future. You have more power now than you have likely had in your lifetime. Seize it, and make the future a good one.


Re: Re:
Unless you're poor. Then it really is that bad. And if you aren't poor, but aren't rich either, then a single major medical problem will bankrupt you (even if you have insurance).
This is an unconscionable situation in the richest nation in the world.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a joke
Don't most people disable cookies by default? They should.
Re: Re: Re:
Actually, yes, it does. If they are right, then they aren't paranoid by definition.
Re: Re:
I think that the activities of the NSA, CIA, or any other TLA should be public as far as possible. There are some circumstances where this isn't realistic. In those circumstances, though, there needs to be real, actual, authoritative, effective oversight by people who represent the US citizenry.
Right now, there isn't. That's an even bigger problem than any individual program, as the lack of oversight is what allows these egregious individual programs to persist.
Re: Re: Re: Traitor Mike
Yes! They still exist and are doing surprisingly well, at least in my area. It's the most convenient way to get fresh milk from local dairies.
Re: Re: What's next....
This. Look what they've done with the term "weapons of mass destruction". Originally, the term referred only to weapons actually capable of mass destruction -- of which there was really only one: nuclear bombs.
Then they started including biological and chemical weapons in the category. You might be able to make the case for certain biological weapons (certainly not anthrax, though), but not chemical weapons.
Now, apparently, a WMD means anything that can kill more than three people at a time, or anything that explodes.
Re: Re:
No.
Re: Re:
Yeah, me too. Right after 9/11, there were three things that sent chills up my spine and made me fear for my country:
When Bush said "if you're not with us, you're against us."
When Ari Fleischer said that Americans have to "watch what we say"
When they used the word "homeland" in the name of their new internal security agency.
Those three things, it turns out, were accurate harbingers of what was to come.
Re:
Yeah, that one of their standard excuses. And one of their most ludicrous ones. It smacks of them pricing based on their personal feelings of the product (this game is so awesome that it's an insult to be paid less than x per unit!), rather than based on what will maximize their returns. In other words, it's really bad business.
Re: Thousands
Yeah, that popped out at me as well. Even if you count graphic artists, cinematographers, musicians, voice actors, etc., as "developers," the need for thousands of them on a single title points to some really serious, heavy-duty managerial problems at the company. As in the sort that could kill the company.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Used Games
But even that measure of usability is very, very weak. It would be just as easy to allow the essential game data to be written to a memory stick and playable anywhere you go.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Used Games
Actually, I think it would be really easy to argue against this. Used games sale do not have much, if any, negative effect on new games sales. Or, at least, there is no evidence whatsoever that they do.
Aside from that, $30 for such a game (that I don't control and cannot resell) would still be dramatically overpriced.
Re: Re: Re:
Same thing.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You're absolutely right. Some mornings, my brain fails me.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Yes, good point. I was having a brain fart this morning.
Nonetheless, it is still dangerous to think of any encryption scheme as uncrackable.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Used Games
That's not unfair. But that's not the hypothesis you proposed. You asked if it was unfair that people who don't purchase used games have to pay more than people who buy used games. I say no, that's not unfair.
Re: i object...
Nailed it!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Used Games
Setting aside that it's not at all clear that sales are being lost to used games, my answer to this question would be "no".
Re: Re: What happened? We let The Born Rich take over.
I emphatically agree. Comments should be flagged or not based on what they say, not on who's doing the saying.
Re: I commented here, is the NSA now tracking me?
Naw, they were tracking you before you ever commented here.