Motorola's Seamless Mobility: Neither Seamless Nor Mobile
from the let's-try-again,-folks dept
We mentioned the non-surprising, non-groundbreaking nature of Motorola's expected announcement concerning a WiFi-enabled mobile phone last week when the company conveniently leaked the info they'd first announced a year and a half ago. Now, after pumping up the PR efforts, it seems that everyone is writing about this WiFi-cellular phone, without bothering to look at the details. However, looking at those details make the phone appear... not that interesting. It's really a very limited device that can only be used with special 802.11a hardware. So, don't think you'll be using the phone at Wi-Fi hotspots any time soon. This is really just a gimmick to try to sell a new mobile phone to business users.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Help me here...
So what exactly is "special" about it being an 802.11a device, other than it doesn't receive nearly as much interference? It isn't a proprietary technology. Matter of fact, I have that particular standard running in my house just fine with multiple vendor hardware (802.11a/b/g in case of guests with outdated hardware using only 802.11b/g).
I make it a point to fill out any comment card/talk to proprieter that I can find at a hotspot location if I have to downgrade my connection to 802.11g or heaven forbid 802.11b when using it.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Help me here...
It's not the 802.11a part that's special, but that the phone will only work with certain WLAN equipment from Avaya and Proxim.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Help me here...
The deal with 802.11a is simple economics.
Stress testing of these VoIP products shows that 802.11b APs can only accomodate ~6 simultaneous callers, while an 802.11a AP can handle ~22.
So if this stuff eventually takes off, customers will quickly overload their systems and become pissed off.
Depending on the cost of the software the ill-effects of vendor lockin, one begins to wonder if its not in the interest of the device makers to just add a $1 DECT chip to thier devices and APs.
Just a thought.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment