it's actually hard to tell.
The lack of bragging about how they are just misunderstood might remove Steele from the list of possibilities.
It might be Duffys wife, who would be much better served by getting out of her little ivory tower and see the scum she has been sleeping next to for what he truly is, and start asking another lawyer if her ass might end up in the sling too.
If it was posted via Mulvad or FL it would most likely be Steele.
There is also the outside chance it was posted using a DoD network or a GA IP and it would be the 'we're not criminals because gay marriage!' lunatic.
Personally I see Dr. Tuteur in a better light, simply because she isn't running from blog to blog complaining how everyone is just out to get her and be mean.
The court ruling has a chance to change the landscape in a dramatic way, that benefits many more than these 2 bloggers in their fight. I see much of the escalation as being driven by 1 parties need to be the correct martyr that the bad people want to silence. Sadly that seems to be the typical reaction nowdays when someone disagrees with someone else.
Mr. Cooper was NOT a party to the case in Judge Wrights courtroom. He was a 3rd party asked to appear and offer testimony. He or his lawyer are not being paid for those appearances.
In the MN case, Cooper filed alleging they stole his identity and to hold them accountable for that. As the Prenda train derails someone would have attempted to sue Alan Cooper who signed the copyright transfers for the shell company and Mr. Cooper would have been left holding the bag for a company he knew nothing about.
She literally did NOTHING to help Mr. Cooper, because she failed to read and understand Judge Wrights order and predecided that Cooper was a bad guy like the other people.
Isn't there a screen shot somewhere of Gina asking her little army of supporters to also send DMCA notices? Pretty sure I saw one, anyone but Gina is allowed to correct me as her grip on reality seems more focused on making herself a martyr.
Oh and Gina, because its clear you can't let any mention of your name go past without injecting your woe is me tale, it is awfully hard to rewrite history on the internet. It never forgets.
Oh and again this story isn't so much about you as it is about a process ripe for abuse and a court ruling about that issue. Your fall is just icing on the cake you whackjob.
Wow... This Judge baffles me.
After they stole Cooper's identity, used it in copyright transfers in what was found by a court to be fraudulent activity, and the defamation suits to shut up Mr. Cooper and his lawyer... she told them no dessert and go to your room.
Anyone still wonder why Pretenda was able to operate for so long (and is still running even with the finding of facts by Judge Wright?).
Gee and its not like we ever saw them using these notices to remove reviews they didn't like... er wait.
The system is broken so long as there is no punishment for getting it wrong or allowing them to just say oops. These are legal documents that if ignored carry punishments for the recipients, so why do the senders get to claim oopsie time and time again?
Why do we allow them to strip away our rights in the name of saving our rights?
It is very confusing, unless the endgame is just to make sure no regular citizens have any rights, then no need to waste time protecting them.
The issue is they can't see the problem...
So this is a case of the blind screwing the blind.
And on a fun note, why hasn't anyone called them on the carpet yet? They complain how people are 'stealing' money from them, and yet they have opted to ignore entire segments of the population and their dollars. If times are that rough, why aren't scrambling to obtain another revenue stream.