well since every conversation had to be with at least 1 other person de-duplication could reduce this to $100 per person... but then you need a backup... so your back to $200/person... Then don't forget government procurement markup of 600%.
ComputerAddict (profile), Mar 29th, 2013 @ 12:09pm
Ready. Set. Disruption.
The market is ready, Google is set to do it, only leaves disruption.
Once a few years of Google Fiber numbers come in, new businesses (read Copy Cats... (Read Pirates.... Read dirty thieves))) will leverage Google's business model as a "proven model" to secure loans from investors and will deploy similar solutions in other areas the country.
Once these startups hit a high enough percentage market share the big ISPs will have to compete (probably only in those areas) or buy out these smaller companies... Both have their headaches, buyouts require will gov't approval, and competing is a new concept to them.
ComputerAddict (profile), Mar 18th, 2013 @ 11:41am
Re: Re: Re:
Especially when you laid out your SC2000 city for SimCopter, strategically placing police/fire/hospitals all over the place (on a grid) to make sure you can rush people back to where they needed to go in no time.
Luckily, "Reasonable Efforts" is loosely defined. I mean I posted an ad on craigslist: "Found pile of plastic parts and trash, probably not worth anything, I do not respond to emails or phone calls, carrier pigeons only"
Totally agree, The fact that THIS sentence isn't a problem, is a problem: "The whole idea that law enforcement can search your mobile phone is based on the idea that they can search items in your possession"
"secure in their persons" I don't feel 'secure' in my person if they are allowed to search anything I have on my person. as said above, I think they need to be able to take steps to make sure they are safe, removing weapons from a suspect while they talk with them, or arrest them, but that doesn't open up the right to search anything in sight
Having your phone stolen vs the data you carry is a calculated risk each person would have to evaluate on their own, living in a more rural area, street crime is relatively low, the convenience outweighs the risk. However this is completely different than the issue of law enforcement breaching the 4th amendment, the topic of the article. I may have to live in fear from street criminal beating me up and stealing my phone... I Should not have to live in fear from the police doing it, they are suppose to be on my side.
Your right let me see what other useful features I can turn off just in case that sometime in the next two years (lifespan of a phone) the chance occurrence I actually get pulled over for a traffic stop and that officer happens to be a douche and searches the content of my mobile phone... OR we could just say what this is, an illegal breach of security in their persons, e-papers, and effects (read: phone). The ONLY search that should be allowed by the Constitution without a warrant is... wait the Constitution didn't allow for any.
An Aside: I do believe officers should be able to search suspects for their own safety (IE, remove knives, guns, weapons to ensure their and public safety at a scene... but unless the next Galaxy S IV comes with a built in Taser phone should be off the table.
Yea the problem is not whether app makes should get the information, just how.
As a google user I share my data with GOOGLE, I should have to give consent for them to share that with a 3rd party.
If a developer wants to know more about their buyers, require in-app registration. Then it is very transparent where the personally identifiable information is going.
"I'd really, really, really like to see MacArthur produce a little evidence to back up his claim that Google gives priority to "free content" sites over those with paywalls. "
probably pretty easy since the better the pay wall the harder it is for google to crawl...
But "legally-speaking" US Govt are not going to use DMCA...
They will just say "this is a matter of National Security.... We're taking your personal computer, any computer on campus that may contain a portion of the streamed clip in their cache, and just because we can, all the YouTube Servers as a punishment for your heinous crimes."
Don't really know, Google aquired it from @Last software to bolster it's 3D buildings in maps/earth. It was just sold to Trimble this year, but there are thousands of profressionals (We use it at my office now for final renderings), We have the paid version in my office which allows higher resolution outputs, but I know others that just use the free version.
I think my school primarily told us they owned everything so they could keep work for accreditation purposes without students crying foul (every 2-6 years depending on how well you scored), as any work they kept they typically gave you a 2 week window to pick up after an accreditation cycle (which was problematic because if they decided to keep your thesis work, you could be 5 years out of school and moved across the country and you had 2 weeks to arrange pick up of your best work before it hit a 40 yard dumpster outside).
Most of my work was created on my system with either free software (google sketchup), free educational versions from autodesk, or other versions not provided by the school. (although plotted on their printers), or Hand drafted with my own tools (albeit on their desk).
On the post: Did FBI Counterterrorism Agent Reveal That Feds Now Record All Phone Calls?
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: If Your Cable Company Were Honest, This Is What Its Commercial Would Look Like
Ready. Set. Disruption.
Once a few years of Google Fiber numbers come in, new businesses (read Copy Cats... (Read Pirates.... Read dirty thieves))) will leverage Google's business model as a "proven model" to secure loans from investors and will deploy similar solutions in other areas the country.
Once these startups hit a high enough percentage market share the big ISPs will have to compete (probably only in those areas) or buy out these smaller companies... Both have their headaches, buyouts require will gov't approval, and competing is a new concept to them.
On the post: Maxis: Your Reward For Buying Our Horribly Launched SimCity Is The Previous, Better Version Of It
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: What Happens To Drones When They Fall Out Of The Skies?
Re:
On the post: The Details Of What Information The Police Can Suck Out Of Your Phone
Re: Re: Re: Sorry but thats not true.
"secure in their persons" I don't feel 'secure' in my person if they are allowed to search anything I have on my person. as said above, I think they need to be able to take steps to make sure they are safe, removing weapons from a suspect while they talk with them, or arrest them, but that doesn't open up the right to search anything in sight
On the post: The Details Of What Information The Police Can Suck Out Of Your Phone
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
On the post: The Details Of What Information The Police Can Suck Out Of Your Phone
Re: Re: Re:
Your right let me see what other useful features I can turn off just in case that sometime in the next two years (lifespan of a phone) the chance occurrence I actually get pulled over for a traffic stop and that officer happens to be a douche and searches the content of my mobile phone... OR we could just say what this is, an illegal breach of security in their persons, e-papers, and effects (read: phone). The ONLY search that should be allowed by the Constitution without a warrant is... wait the Constitution didn't allow for any.
An Aside: I do believe officers should be able to search suspects for their own safety (IE, remove knives, guns, weapons to ensure their and public safety at a scene... but unless the next Galaxy S IV comes with a built in Taser phone should be off the table.
On the post: Comcast: We Won't Terminate Your Account Under Six Strikes; We'll Just Block Every Single Website
Re:
1 Down.. I wonder if 5 more people would also accuse you of stuff just because they dont like you...
You know what... I think for this one I will hold my breath... shouldn't take too long.
On the post: New Hampshire Politicians Want To Make 'Satellite View' On Maps A Criminal Offense
Re: Good bye Larry and Sergey
Then just wait till the law is repealed.
On the post: Google Play Flaw Gives App Developers Purchaser's Information
Re: Re: Sounds more like FUD to me...
As a google user I share my data with GOOGLE, I should have to give consent for them to share that with a 3rd party.
If a developer wants to know more about their buyers, require in-app registration. Then it is very transparent where the personally identifiable information is going.
On the post: Harper's Magazine Publisher Shakes Verbal Fist At Google; Romanticizes Own Profession; Quotes Teletubbies
Re: Re:
On the post: Harper's Magazine Publisher Shakes Verbal Fist At Google; Romanticizes Own Profession; Quotes Teletubbies
Re:
On the post: Harper's Magazine Publisher Shakes Verbal Fist At Google; Romanticizes Own Profession; Quotes Teletubbies
probably pretty easy since the better the pay wall the harder it is for google to crawl...
On the post: Japanese Government To Start Seeding P2P Networks With Faux Files Containing Copyright Warnings
Re:
On the post: Japanese Government To Start Seeding P2P Networks With Faux Files Containing Copyright Warnings
Re:
On the post: Japanese Government To Start Seeding P2P Networks With Faux Files Containing Copyright Warnings
Re: Re: Re:
That depends, do either your friend or yourself wear an eyepatch?
On the post: Collateral Censorship: Oxford Union Replaces Assange Speech Backdrop, Citing 'Copyright' Concerns
Re: Re:
They will just say "this is a matter of National Security.... We're taking your personal computer, any computer on campus that may contain a portion of the streamed clip in their cache, and just because we can, all the YouTube Servers as a punishment for your heinous crimes."
On the post: Copyright Insanity: School Policy Requires Students Hand Over Copyright On All Work
Re: Re: Common.
On the post: Copyright Insanity: School Policy Requires Students Hand Over Copyright On All Work
Re: Re: Re: Re: Common.
I think my school primarily told us they owned everything so they could keep work for accreditation purposes without students crying foul (every 2-6 years depending on how well you scored), as any work they kept they typically gave you a 2 week window to pick up after an accreditation cycle (which was problematic because if they decided to keep your thesis work, you could be 5 years out of school and moved across the country and you had 2 weeks to arrange pick up of your best work before it hit a 40 yard dumpster outside).
On the post: Copyright Insanity: School Policy Requires Students Hand Over Copyright On All Work
Re: Re: Common.