There is an error in this article's title. Adobe has been selling their Creative Cloud Subscription service for over a year. It was announced in 2011 and went live in the first half of 2012.
Adobe did release a major update to their major products; so you are probably referring to 24 hours after the release of that update; not 24 hours after the release of the subscription service.
The Creative cloud Subscription includes some services; such as a dropbox like file sharing utility and integration with Behance a platform for sharing work. I assume such services are not easily 'crackable' due to their nature.
But, I'm not the least bit surprised that the desktop software was cracked, though.
[Disclaimer: I am an Adobe Community Professional http://www.adobe.com/communities/professionals/ ]
I'm surprised you didn't embed this video:
http://www.denofgeek.com/games/playstation-4/25953/sony-explains-how-to-share-and-trade-games-on-the-ps4
[Which I assume to be legit and official]
A theory is the most complete understanding science has based on the available facts.
A hypothesis is a guess that hasn't been proved yet.
Sounds like you're using 'theory' in this article when you mean 'hypothesis'.
Why would the gaming company have copyright on the video I create? It is, most likely, a derivative work.
Have any proof that such things happened in Watertown last month?
The one person I know in the area said it wasn't like that at all; and officers were very cordial / polite during the search. There was no forced home entry and any home search was optional.
They recommended I read this: http://abad1dea.tumblr.com/post/48488539386/thoughts-on-the-boston-lockdown-from-the-edge
My impression is that he is envisioning dumb screens everywhere; that your phone can easily hooked into/power.
I have to admit the idea is compelling; and does seem to far fetched to me.
And the mobile versions. And removing integration w/ services other than Twitter, such as Facebook.
I do something similar regarding Tweetdeck and Twitter. I created a list of news sites that I'm interested in watching. And also a list of my "50 or so" of my closest friends on twitter. I watch these two lists more than my regular feed.
How do you feel about TweetDeck going away? Have you researched / moved onto replacements, yet?
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57572483-93/twitter-kills-android-iphone-and-air-desktop-apps-for-tweetdeck/?tag=mncol;txt
And I had one more point. If the DRM scheme is somehow added to the HTML spec; it would be part of HTML; not a plugin.
Isn't the HTML Working Group made up of only big players?
All browsers implement proprietary functionality not part the of a ratified HTML spec. Generally, what gets used becomes the standard and the spec catches up to that.
I'd argue that proprietary functionality within IE(6) was a huge win for Microsoft. Many enterprises built apps on IE6, effectively locking enterprises into IE6 and effectively killing most of the browser competition. Of course, as this happened, IE progress ceased for many years. That is bad for consumers--but was good for Microsoft.
This lack of progress paved the way for new competitors such as Firefox and Chrome.
The way you describe it; it sounds like he may be guilty of a contract violation; but wouldn't that be different than a copyright violation?
The clause you point out relates to the licensing contract w/ Harry Fox Agency, not copyright law. Correct?
I got really confused....
We all buy computers [insert pause here] without subsidies from our ISPs.
I'm not sure if copyright would have a direct influence on innovation.
However, I can see an indirect influence on innovation if copyright is used to prevent use of research studies / papers. That way, everyone is potentially starting from scratch instead of building off the works of others.
As one example, imagine trying to connect two computers today on different sides of the country if the copyright was used to prevent folks from using the TCP/IP Protocol? I suspect our lives would be very different today.
Nothing in the quoted text actually supports the illegal actions of the journalists. It basically, says increased competition put them under pressure; which I think is fairly astute.
Too bad they acted badly when put under pressure.
Hallmark is a pretty strong brand name in the card business. My mom has specifically gone into Hallmark stores to buy Hallmark cards.
I think any kind of business can develop relationships with customers.
I'm not sure this is protectionism..
Oatmeal studios doesn't seem to want to prevent "The Oatmeal" from selling cards; it just wants to prevent him from doing so under a name similar to theirs.
I admit the two names are pretty similar and I can see confusion. If I'm buying greeting cards in a store; it seems unlikely I'll do a Google search to find out more details on specific companies [or not]
You're not a programmer are you?
I used to have a dozen or so reference books right by my computer; but now it is quicker to perform a search and I dumped almost all of my paper books a few years ago.
This is not unique to Microsoft or the Surface. An iOS or Android device will have the same issue.
If Microsoft is "Wrong" for not advertising usable space; then why not Apple or Samsung or Motorola or [insert your favorite hardware manufacturer here?
I don't understand how any of this is "classic Microsoft fashion" though. Does XBox exhibit the same problem? I can't think of any other hardware that Microsoft sells which would be comparable.
You mean the commercial for Disney world?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4_dZPVg8KI
Just Subscribing
I'm just subscribing to comments