It's because the question is the standard slanted whine that comes from people who aren't thinking for themselves. It's just whining, nothing more.
I'm going to use this answer when some of you maximalists complain about piracy.
Pattern? Like someone calling you out on your logo and you swiching it and basically not saying a thing?
Like calling sharers (that is me, I share) pirates and thiefs? Deliberately confusing theft and infrigement? Like LYING about not finding a single article "where he sided with the artist/author whose rights were being violated by infringers" (FTFY) when he has a whole page dedicated to help them adapt to reality of today (Step 2)?
If I could spell hypocrisy and irony with one word, it'd be your middle name.
yeah, it's all government fault - forget the fact that USA is not a democracy. I'd call it monetarian polycracy, but hey - it seems monetarian prefix could be added to any -cracy or -archy out there.
I'm not sure about this - but where does US constitution mentions right just for us citizens? Isn't the exact wording person?
correct me, if I'm wrong...
I'm just gonna IRON that Y on the ironing board of anon cowards.
Yes, his original statement was/is enough.
Recent statistics? Links or it didn't happen.
Strange - tablets and rounded corners existed since the 80s - existing tehnology? Also - isn't it the specific application/implementation you can patent but not the underlying tehnology/idea?
Check his links. Search for 95. --> less time needed than for writing these words :)
I understood Leigh in this manner:
If you imagine non-'scaled back' public domain - its growth would be significant compared to growth we've seen in a 'scaled back' version.
Anon thinking:
Goshdarnit, this eejit is making factual and smart answers. Screw that - I'm just going to answer other two replies and it's going to look as if I've replied to everyone.
Google is not just Mike's employer. Google employs everyone here - we are all paid to comment on a blog in our free time.
.
.
.
...EVERYONE!!!...
I know you have no such proof.
No. You don't.
Sure he did:
Anonymous Coward, Sep 11th, 2012 @ 5:11pm
=)
Crap. You're right. My mistake man, sorry for pushing. (shame smiley)
Look, I am able to use math:
12000000 * 250 B = 3000000000 B
3000000000 B/1024 = 2929687,5 MB
2929687,5 MB/1024 = 2861,023 GB
2861,023 GB != 3 GB
It's not 3 TB but it definitely is at least 2.
But inside you know you're wrong. Just believe me (that this is a pirate den and everybody except me and other trolls is Mikes puppet) I am a non-sociopath and I defamed Mike enough that he lost all credibility (since these freetards have an average iq of 100, this was an extremely easy task) and then I threw in some logical fallacies and voila - I won the internets favor. It's a good thing I'm not a sociopath.
FTFY
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
You're a bit selective about who you deem worthy of answer?