So... your copyright laws got fucked up even further? But there's now a good chance of sending Justin Bieber to jail? Well, that's a small consolation I suppose.
I'm wondering. I've seen a lot of "let smokers pay for their own cancer treatment".
How about obese people? By now there's more of those in most western countries than there are smokers.
I'd say. I mean when you see that you stop buying that brand or from that shop. Or am I missing something?
Once again, it's your democracy at work. You get what you vote for. Or the people that bought the politicians get value for money.
Either way, it's good enough for a good chuckle. Yet one more step away from freedom for the land of the free... Love the irony of it.
Perhaps this will root out this practice. I remember the trailer for "best defense" and then actually seeing it... another fine example of a trailer consisting of the only good bits of the entire film.
I say go ahead with tihs, just because it's normal practice in the industry doesn't mean it's not misleading.
Yes, you get the legal system you vote for. The open network is an interesting angle and I really do wonder what your good reasons are
I've seen high heeled shoes with red soles in the last century already. In fact I can remember a little shoestore in Vienna that had quite a collection
Good to see at least one judge in the US of A has some common sense when it comes to these things
So glad to read I'm not the only one! Because it's on techdirt and I've never heard of her she's probably considered good looking by some
There's way too many films these days where I'd expect to get paid $30 to sit 'm out. I can't recall 3 films made in the last 5 years where I'd even gone to the theatre for. Not that going to a movie theatre is that much fun. Sound tracks are all about how many subsonic rumbles you can get away with as a director. Volume is just short of real pain level. Seats are uncomfortable, the floor sticks and "one does not meet a better class of people"
This reminds me of the convoluted reasoning we saw a lot between 2007 and 2010. If you went somewhere crowded to take pictures with a DSLR without a press pass you must be some terrorist coming to scout the site for the next attack. Never mind that any terrorist with enough brains to clean an AK-47 would use a cheap compact or a cellphone.
This is so insane, so clearly a way to protect a single company that it's almost certain to get passed.
Going to be nice though.
1. How on earth to check/prove?
2. Serious enforcement of this law will quickly get the entire country to run low on things like affordable clothes or cheap electronics.
I'll be watching from Europe, popcorn on standby, ready to laugh myself silly.
I'm not going to pledge even one cent when the inevitable begging begins. Even for Africa this is a remarkable transition, from a prosperous country to this in about a decade.
American company sues for insane damages amount. Court case drags on for years, settlement ends lower with a judge finding someone guilty everyone normal person on the street would find innocent.
I don't see the news value here, sounds perfectly normal american behaviour.
Ah yes, the american litigation culture. Good for a bunch of giggles anywhere else on the planet.
And this in the US of A? Wauw! Must be because it's so close to Canada, some common sense was blown across the border.
Anyway, can't the county or state decide this needs to be taken to court?
I'm a hobby photographer myself. Occasionally one of my photos is chosen by a company, usually a publishing company. They tend to ask and we agree on a small fee.
I also get emailed by private individuals who want to use one of my works on their personal website. Unless it's in a context with which I totally disagree I tend to allow it for free.
Another category is people who don't ask permission, that tends to annoy me especially if they don't link back.
Only on one occasion I've issued a takedown notice. Someone had copied one of my pics onto their flickr account and was presenting it as their own work. Tried to solve it via mail but no response whatsoever.
In this case, apple using it on many millions of devices, I think a decent fee would be in order. Apple can afford it.
After all, you guys created your political system where special interest groups have way too much influence.
Add to that 8 years of facist rule under bush the younger and this is what you get.
To be honest, I wouldn't have been surprised if she'd been sentenced to the stocks in the nearest mega-mall.
I've read dozens of articles like this over the years and I think you Americans are getting what you deserve. The American people have used the last few decades to get themselves a government that revolves around lobbyists and special interest groups and a legal system that accepts and rewards insane lawsuits (spilling hot coffee, drying dogs in a microwave)
Both lead to situations like this and lawsuits where the copyright mafia can get millions in damages awarded to them.
Now as far as America is concerned, it's your problem, you clean it up. Unfortunately the rest of the world tends to ape America so part of this rot is spreading, that's a shame.
In 2006 they were already critised for having 300million on the market and losing, supposedly, 47m of that.
http://www.aboutdj.nl/nieuws/295-buma-stemra-wel-echt-zon-goede-organisatie.html
Dig around and bit and you'll notice a lot of fishy things about the dutch branch of the RIAA
I was in Malta in the mid 1990s and there juice boxes of wine were as popular with teens then as cans of energy drink and wodka are now.