I can still obtain information without an Internet; it's just a slower process.
I can NOT protect said information, or the fruits of that information, from those that would take it from me, especially without due process of a law (a binding contract between the GOVERNED and the GOVERMENT--which is itself an instrument of the GOVERNED), that must be invoked, and violation proven, in a court of law, without a gun.
Really? How would you know this? How can you prove ANYTHING of the accusations you are leveling?
WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE??
Under this so-called "law", there is no proof; there is no due process; there is no presumption of innocence. Therefore, it is merely a violation of the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments; and a massive shakedown by the **AAs to supplement their bottom lines, because they're just a bunch of thieves who have abused every tax loophole possible, bribed every dirty public official they could find, and bought as many "laws" as they could to extort money from ordinary people with the threat of a "letter", or "jail", or "no Internet".
And by being their fluffers, bob and OOTB, you perpetuate the same CRIMES they are perpetuating, and their leashed sycophants the CRIMES they are committing perverting our laws into the joke they've become.
The problem is that it's not about Google and their ads; it's about the CUSTOMER, who are those who use Google and their OS. If I don't want ads, I'm not going to deal with them in any way, because it's MY phone, not Google's. And if they don't like it, and they decide to screw with me (their customer), then they LOSE THAT CUSTOMER, potentially for good.
That's the problem with Apple's app store, and their draconian control measures: they strive to tell US what to do with our phone, our apps, our money; and it's why we went elsewhere for our phones and services.
Google needs to pull their collective heads out of their collective butts, and give us what we want, and pay for.
Wow, so much stupid in this statement, I don't know where to begin!
"Patents..block the theft of": yeah, they give you a great source of revenue: extortion by lawyer, where you extract free cash from ignorant rubes to fatten your bottom line.
"Without us (:wtf:).. China and other low wage...nations...keep steam rolling America": Hell, y'all send all your work to them because we stupid Americans are too damn "expensive" for you to use--profit über alles, right??
"Considering we create the lions [sic] share of new jobs...:": Utter bullshit: you send them all overseas, except for the lawyers you use to extort cash from your victims. There are very few decent jobs around now, and you haven't created diddly-squat, except more cash in your back pocket.
If anything, you're the damned liar; and all you want is protectionism for your monopoly.
You want I hate more than the cowards that have their heads stuck up the media companies asses? Websites that feel it necessary to slap you with annoying popup ads that are designed to annoy the FUCK out of people, and encourage false clicks.
And that link leads right to a site that repeats the info already stated here, word-for-word, which is less than useful; and the ad situation makes it a NO CLICK ZONE.
Oh yes; yes, it IS good enough! Or it can be made good enough!
Hell, this will explode all over the Internet, and perhaps further, with that "fuckin' asshole" clip being used on everything possible--even in forums, where it could potentially be the biggest meme since the goatse.
Re: This is AGAIN the use of RARE anomalies to attack...
BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!
You are such a self-deluded fool of a puppet, it's not funny!!
Oh, fuck it, who am I kidding?? You're fucking hilarious!
I think it's high time that some of our more enterprising members 1) find pictures of your sorry self, and photochop a nice big arm leading from your ass to the MAFIAA overlords you have sold yourself to. And then chop that "fuckin' asshole" audio onto the picture.
Just for good measure, you know: we have to warn the rest of the free-thinking world of your idiocy.
Autoweek: Now that's how a review should be written--clear, concise, factual, and with the author's feelings and impressions at the end, properly attributed and separated from the facts.
Had Broder done his article like that, NONE of this would have happened, period.
On the post: UK Politician Says EU Site Wants To 'Brainwash' Children With Propaganda About Democratic Principles
Wrong title, Glyn...
I think that is more correct.
On the post: Six Strikes Is Just 'Soft SOPA'
BECAUSE, EXTORTION.
[/thread]
On the post: Six Strikes Is Just 'Soft SOPA'
Re: Some of you Yanks are crazy....
I can NOT protect said information, or the fruits of that information, from those that would take it from me, especially without due process of a law (a binding contract between the GOVERNED and the GOVERMENT--which is itself an instrument of the GOVERNED), that must be invoked, and violation proven, in a court of law, without a gun.
On the post: Six Strikes Is Just 'Soft SOPA'
Re: Clearly, Minion Cushing is pro-piracy.
WHAT PROOF DO YOU HAVE??
Under this so-called "law", there is no proof; there is no due process; there is no presumption of innocence. Therefore, it is merely a violation of the 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments; and a massive shakedown by the **AAs to supplement their bottom lines, because they're just a bunch of thieves who have abused every tax loophole possible, bribed every dirty public official they could find, and bought as many "laws" as they could to extort money from ordinary people with the threat of a "letter", or "jail", or "no Internet".
And by being their fluffers, bob and OOTB, you perpetuate the same CRIMES they are perpetuating, and their leashed sycophants the CRIMES they are committing perverting our laws into the joke they've become.
On the post: Six Strikes Is Just 'Soft SOPA'
Re: Re: Re: Re: And what would you prefer?
On the post: Six Strikes Is Just 'Soft SOPA'
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And what would you prefer?
On the post: Six Strikes Is Just 'Soft SOPA'
Re: Re: Re: Re: And what would you prefer?
On the post: Six Strikes Is Just 'Soft SOPA'
Re: Re: Re: And what would you prefer?
On the post: United Airlines Kicks Travel Writer Off Of Plane For Photographing His Seat
You are a bunch of blithering idiots. I will now stop covering you so positively, and go fluff up AmeriAirways.
Sincerely,
The blogger that you tossed off your plane for no good reason.
On the post: Bad Move: Google Removes AdBlock Plus From Google Play Store
Re: Re: Re: ABP screwed up
That's the problem with Apple's app store, and their draconian control measures: they strive to tell US what to do with our phone, our apps, our money; and it's why we went elsewhere for our phones and services.
Google needs to pull their collective heads out of their collective butts, and give us what we want, and pay for.
On the post: Former Chief Judge Of Patent Court: We Need To Strengthen, Not Weaken, The Patent System Because [Reasons]
Re: waterjet cutting
On the post: Former Chief Judge Of Patent Court: We Need To Strengthen, Not Weaken, The Patent System Because [Reasons]
Re: lies and damned lies
"Patents..block the theft of": yeah, they give you a great source of revenue: extortion by lawyer, where you extract free cash from ignorant rubes to fatten your bottom line.
"Without us (:wtf:).. China and other low wage...nations...keep steam rolling America": Hell, y'all send all your work to them because we stupid Americans are too damn "expensive" for you to use--profit über alles, right??
"Considering we create the lions [sic] share of new jobs...:": Utter bullshit: you send them all overseas, except for the lawyers you use to extort cash from your victims. There are very few decent jobs around now, and you haven't created diddly-squat, except more cash in your back pocket.
If anything, you're the damned liar; and all you want is protectionism for your monopoly.
On the post: Six Strikes Officially Begins On Monday
...
."BBBBZZZZZZZZZZTTT!!!"
"You were warned, user."
"GGGRRRROOOAAANNNNN!!"
On the post: NYT Paywall Working Better Than People Expected, But That Doesn't Mean It's Working
And that link leads right to a site that repeats the info already stated here, word-for-word, which is less than useful; and the ad situation makes it a NO CLICK ZONE.
DO. NOT. CLICK. THE. SLOG. LINK!!
On the post: Company Tries To Delete Recording Of Exec Cursing Analyst During Conference Call Via Copyright Claim
Re: I would like to see
Hell, this will explode all over the Internet, and perhaps further, with that "fuckin' asshole" clip being used on everything possible--even in forums, where it could potentially be the biggest meme since the goatse.
On the post: Company Tries To Delete Recording Of Exec Cursing Analyst During Conference Call Via Copyright Claim
Re: This is AGAIN the use of RARE anomalies to attack...
You are such a self-deluded fool of a puppet, it's not funny!!
Oh, fuck it, who am I kidding?? You're fucking hilarious!
I think it's high time that some of our more enterprising members 1) find pictures of your sorry self, and photochop a nice big arm leading from your ass to the MAFIAA overlords you have sold yourself to. And then chop that "fuckin' asshole" audio onto the picture.
Just for good measure, you know: we have to warn the rest of the free-thinking world of your idiocy.
On the post: Non-profit Responds To Threatened Lawsuit From Ferrari By 'Remaking' Video To Hide The Ferrari
Re: Not a Ferrari logo, me thinks.
On the post: NJ Gubenatorial Candidate Speaks Out Against Six Strikes: ISP Shouldn't Decide What You Can Download
Re: Re: Re:
On the post: What The Tesla / NY Times Fight Teaches Us About The Media
Re: Other problematic reviews
Had Broder done his article like that, NONE of this would have happened, period.
On the post: UK Mobile Operator 3UK Filtering New Class Of 'Mature Content', Including Political Satire
Re: Togther to fight porngraphy
Spammer spamming "adults[sic] websites" blocking software, when the ENTIRE thread is about the ISP doing the blocking!
Idiot spammers being idiots. And spammers.