No it's not enough. EA sells this shit and their stock goes up. Unreal.
This may not be precisely up TD's alley, but there's a real problem of customers not understanding that EA's business model of shit = profit is working wonderfully. Disposable consumers and, um, "liquidating" title loyalty.
I got a SimCity 4 from a pirate named Joe. It crashed constantly, but my test drive pleased me. Thinking the pirate were distributing nastyware, I went and bought SimCity 4 + Rush Hour. It crashed constantly. I realized the pirates were perfect, and EA was the nasty.
They appeared content to let the modders fix the problems they knew about, e.g., opera house & traffic routing.
That was it; SimCity 4 is actually the epitome of crapware to me. Haven't paid EA since.
I think it's quite clear that EA still doesn't accept there is any great problem. If there was, they would have stop sales. Instead, EA says "this is how we make our money. We bring you Hell, we bring you high water, you only need to click 'buy now'."
I have thousands of products and services for sale that will make you healthier if you buy them. Yes, I already examined you and said your healthy, but being healthier is better.
Regarding your defense for lawyers, I'd have to say that your summary also explains why people hate lawyers. You may want to reconsider before using this argument again.
I interpret your summary to be that a lawyer has to take bad cases because it's their job. If I understand that, allow to me to reword to express the lack of morality:
Lawyers lack the heart to turn down a paycheck and refuse a bad case.
That's how I read it, and it suits the "money-grubbing" stereotype.
All admit that I have not addressed the portion where you claim they are nobel because they didn't let the client file on their own. I don't have the expertise to know whether or not that's the obvious b.s. it sounds like.
On the post: SimCity Always-Online DRM Lets Hackers Play Godzilla With Anyone's Cities
Re:
No it's not enough. EA sells this shit and their stock goes up. Unreal.
This may not be precisely up TD's alley, but there's a real problem of customers not understanding that EA's business model of shit = profit is working wonderfully. Disposable consumers and, um, "liquidating" title loyalty.
On the post: Maxis: Your Reward For Buying Our Horribly Launched SimCity Is The Previous, Better Version Of It
SimCity 4 was the last EA game I bought.
They appeared content to let the modders fix the problems they knew about, e.g., opera house & traffic routing.
That was it; SimCity 4 is actually the epitome of crapware to me. Haven't paid EA since.
On the post: DailyDirt: Counting Calories Should Be A National Pastime
On the post: DailyDirt: Valuable Metals Abound
Re:
On the post: SimCity: The Backlash
Re: Par for the course
On the post: SimCity: The Backlash
Par for the course
On the post: SimCity: The Backlash
Re:
On the post: No Nudity: Playboy's iPhone App To Test Men's 'For The Articles' Excuse
Re: Re:
On the post: 7-Year-Old Student Suspended For Waving Around A 'Gun' Made From A Pastry
School rules
On the post: What Happens To Drones When They Fall Out Of The Skies?
On the post: Turns Out The NSA Doesn't Really Want Drop-In Visitors (With Cameras) At Their New Utah Spy Facility
On the post: Yes, The US Industrial Revolution Was Built On Piracy And Fraud
We are civilized now. Times are different and we must look to the future and not the past.
/sarc
On the post: Non-profit Responds To Threatened Lawsuit From Ferrari By 'Remaking' Video To Hide The Ferrari
On the post: Six Strikes Officially Begins On Monday
On the post: Healthcare Isn't A Free Market, It's A Giant Economic Scam
Re: There are doctors fighting back.
On the post: Healthcare Isn't A Free Market, It's A Giant Economic Scam
Re:
On the post: Healthcare Isn't A Free Market, It's A Giant Economic Scam
Re: Repay in small amounts
Brilliant.
On the post: Judge: Mocking Lindsay Lohan Is Allowed; Plagiarizing A Court Filing, Not So Much
Re:
I interpret your summary to be that a lawyer has to take bad cases because it's their job. If I understand that, allow to me to reword to express the lack of morality:
Lawyers lack the heart to turn down a paycheck and refuse a bad case.
That's how I read it, and it suits the "money-grubbing" stereotype.
All admit that I have not addressed the portion where you claim they are nobel because they didn't let the client file on their own. I don't have the expertise to know whether or not that's the obvious b.s. it sounds like.
On the post: Judge: Mocking Lindsay Lohan Is Allowed; Plagiarizing A Court Filing, Not So Much
Re:
Some people go over the bar.
Some people go under.
On the post: No Nudity: Playboy's iPhone App To Test Men's 'For The Articles' Excuse