Actually ... that's ok ... it's reading your newspaper while driving your horse-less carriage that's a problem!!
I loudly applaud your proper usage of the much abused and mangled expression! Well Done!
While i'm against doing this to the mentally ill to "let the demons out" I suspect that with the right subjects restrained for the trepanning tool it could be highly entertaining ... infact i'm sure that there are people that would pay to watch!
Brute Force Search Space Analysis:
Search Space Depth (Alphabet): 26+26+10+33 = 95
Search Space Length (Characters): 26 characters
Exact Search Space Size (Count):
(count of all possible passwords
with this alphabet size and up
to this password's length) 2,663,234,997,260,162,
196,476,097,223,547,872,
948,519,727,017,017,120
Search Space Size (as a power of 10): 2.66 x 1051
Time Required to Exhaustively Search this Password's Space:
Online Attack Scenario:
(Assuming one thousand guesses per second) 8.47 hundred trillion trillion trillion centuries
Offline Fast Attack Scenario:
(Assuming one hundred billion guesses per second) 8.47 million trillion trillion centuries
Massive Cracking Array Scenario:
(Assuming one hundred trillion guesses per second) 8.47 thousand trillion trillion centuries
that's pretty damn secure ... and not a little paranoid!
Check out Steve Gibsons article on generating passwords that are memorable and hard to guess https://www.grc.com/haystack.htm
my password manager password shows the following results for "crackability" using his tool and it's easy to remember, a pain in the ass to type, but easy to remember.
Couple with your approach to storing pass words with his approach to generating memorable passwords and you're almost unhackable.
About 5 minutes ... .
Funny how when the DOJ circumvents the letter of the law by lying about the facts, the law forced them to do it; But when Aereo complies with the letter of the law, they're accused of deliberately circumventing it and slapped down.
That Keene happened AFTER Ferguson ... in the aftermath of a similar incident the Keene PD acted with the clear benefit of hindsight which is always 20/20.
Maybe we can attribute their more restrained response to them learning a lesson from someone else's mistake instead of attributing it to a racial motivation.
But hey if we did that ... it wouldn't be "news" would it ?
Mommy, where are we going? And, why are we in this hand-basket?
Isn't it a universally accepted principle under the law that coerced agreement isn't binding on the coerced party?
So then ... this is just propaganda and intimidation. For my money I say click "Agree" and ignore it!
but in all honesty i have to admit that this sort of capriciousness is exactly what I've come to expect from those in authority.
God help us.
The show is pretty entertaining ... if more than a little over the top.
Possibly ... but that assumes they used the same accounts for their subsequent predations. If the predators indeed used the same accounts, then MM clearly facilitated their actions. I seriously doubt this was the case ...
the nsa guy says it's legal ... he is telling the truth. laws were passed, executive orders issued and court precedents set that makes it all "legal".
it's also unconstitutional, but until SCOTUS rules on the laws in place and declares them unconstitutional it remains "legal".
"you're going to find that many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view." Obi-Wan Kenobi and from the NSA point of view everything they are doing is perfectly in accordance with the law.
Doesn't a "war" require a declaration of Congress to actually be a war ? And since no war has been declared by Congress, how does the Executive reasonably use the provisions of war to justify unconstitutional activity?
Put simply ... Even if you agree with the prima facie argument that in time of war the Executive has the power to ignore the Constitution; Since Congress never declared war and thus no state of war exists, the provisions of war that grant the Executive the power to ignore the Constitution don't apply and any argument that they do is entirely specious. Simply calling something a "war" doesn't make it one.
Interesting that you think this is incredible Mike ... There is a long and storied tradition of blaming the messenger. I think it's inevitable that the messenger will be blamed by the powers that be and their hired shills.
it's commentary on the efficacy of the FCC commenting process.
We all know the FCC is, statistically speaking, most likely to do whatever the moneyed interests want without regard to the interests and opinions express by the public commentary.
Perhaps this is his way of illustrating his recognition of the probable futility of commenting, and at the same time participating in the process. Like writing "Maytag Repairman" on your ballot ...
In short ... Title II of the telecommunications act covers the regulation of telecommunication services (like telephone) ... and the FCC has a lot of power under Title II to regulate providers. Internet service providers are currently classified as information services, not telecommunications providers, and are not subject to title II provisions.
Re: Re: Liars
the 2 things are not parallel and should never be treated that way.
ianal but the difference is that lying in court is a criminal offence called ~perjury~... requiring a separate criminal proceeding to resolve.
a foul on the ball field is a rules violation that is administratively punished under the same rules during the same "proceeding" (the legal parallel is contempt of court).
the referee (who hands out fouls) in sports is theoretically impartial; the district attorney (who pursues indictments) isn't and has a vested interest in not calling "foul" on the law enforcement "players".
it's like the coach for the home team has taken over the job of referee.
we wouldn't accept that in sports why do we accept it in court?