I like the addition of extra spaces at the end of the lines, but it seems like you could easily encrypt FAR more data if you made the spaces themselves vary in width. Or maybe vary the distance between each consecutive character in the sentence.
I am not a cryptography expert, but it seems like you could break it down on smaller parts of the original document.
The son of a guy who mowed lawns in our neighborhood was recently shot and killed by police after an alleged car jacking. The police commander made the following statement to the media, "This young man made a bad choice and paid for it with his life."
I find this sickening that police officers get to make the decision on how that young man was to pay for his crime. That is assuming he even did it since no cop actually witnessed it happening.
If police want the trust and respect of the community, they need to have a 180 attitude adjustment over their role in that community.
Well, it seems that if they like what they do and want to stay for the flat rate pay, then good for them. I think what I was getting at was that mediocre teacher would be there until they didn't feel the money was worth it and then move on. One does not preclude the other.
Teachers make shit when they are first starting out and have to spend hundreds of hours writing all their lesson plans from scratch and spend hundreds of dollars of their own money on supplies for the room. This all assuming they can even find a job.
Then when they get cushy and bored from not having to improve their lessons or freshen up the room, they are making a ton of money and likely cannot be fired.
I saw a great proposal that all teachers should be paid a flat rate with no raises ever. Said flat rate should be very high - say $100-125,000 per year. This would pull in the best and the brightest to teach and cause them to leave and do something more productive after a few years of no raises.
High turnover for teachers would be a good thing if it prevented stagnation. My most boring, ineffective teachers were all on the tail end of their careers.
Likely, this would also require a loosening of the teacher's licensing requirements. However, if all the people chasing those $125,000 paychecks are smart people who are motivated, then who cares if they have a teaching certificate!
Obviously the Indiana State Police need this device to thwart terrorism in Indiana. Indiana has had, LITERALLY, zero of thousands of terrorist attacks in the past few years. If we don't rein in this problem, many more Hoosiers will be not bothered by anyone.
Thank goodness we have secret stuff that we don't know about protecting us from things that are really happening.
Most planes already have or currently are dumping the headrest TVs because everyone has their iPads and phones to watch crap on. So instead they just sell wifi and people download their own stuff or stream netflix or whatever.
But the intelligence lawyers warned that Americans' would be subject to even greater privacy incursions if their personal information were stripped from NSA's control.
Wait! Is the NSA really trying to say that without them snooping in your data that Google or MS or whoever would be violating my privacy? And that the NSA is the key to Google or MS or whoever NOT violating my privacy?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Intelligence of other countries should thank them
I'm not an expert here, but I think you are mistaken. End-to-end encryption doesn't just cover the message itself. It also covers the transmission of that message including its sender and its destination. I think this would be tied into DNSSec. For email specifically, it would involve the previously mentioned Dark Mail.
The point of end-to-end encryption is that it would be end-to-end and not leave any dangling metadata. Perhaps there would be some ability to track the amount of data transmitted, but that would be obfuscated by sending extra data, using compression, sending messages split into chunks, or using stenography.
Re: Re: Re: Intelligence of other countries should thank them
But once again, what I'm getting at, most of that goes away (aside from the Al Qaeda thing) when end-to-end encryption is put into service. The NSA and GCHQ simply won't be able to harvest the traffic.
Not really. Do you think terrorist groups use gmail to communicate? Yet they tap Google.
I think we are agreeing here. I said in my prior comment that they point was NEVER to spy on terrorists (although that was the excuse). With end-to-end encryption, spying on Gmail or Skype or whatever is ineffective. So what is the NSA's or GCHQ's job at that point? Why would they be around? Maybe they can get back to their actual mission instead of spying on their own citizens.