<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by Watchit</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c391</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:12:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c391</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, because blows to the torso and midriff are completely non lethal all the time of course, especially with double handed strikes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Timbo</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c540</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:46:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c540</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here in america we ridicule stupid people equally, regardless of race.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c515</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:44:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c515</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because the big media companies who made said violent movies also control most major media outlets. Ergo the higher ups in big media say it's violent video games, not movies.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Over 100C!!!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c506</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:42:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c506</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think you missed the point...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Pure Half-Assed CYA ...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c332</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:39:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c332</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But but the command line is complicated and scary looking! If that's not what hackers use, what is?!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Don't go out of your way to write a scraper program!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c226</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:53:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c226</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't understand the first point?<br />
<br />
your second point: why would someone imply that someone else is liable to be sued if not to threaten to sue? even if said threat is empty? <br />
<br />
Also, I don't think the article implies charges are imminent. It's implied that <i>if</i> the companies decide to sue it will be laughed out of court, so it's unlikely that they actually will.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Computer Fraud and Abuse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c158</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:44:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c158</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, one would assume it's the telco's threatening to sue, since it was their data they left open...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Pure Half-Assed CYA ...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c147</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:43:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c147</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It kinda reminds me of the story a while back about the guy who found a simple security loophole on his banks website and he got charged with CFAA. I can't remember the details exactly though. It pretty much boiled down to "The act of trying to circumvent the website's security counts as hacking, no matter how simple and obviously open the system was."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c29</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:30:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c29</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[HACKERS! HACKERS! HOW DARE THEY USE GOOGLE TO HACK THAT INFO!!!1]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Over 100C!!!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c375</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:44:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c375</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Also, to extrapolate a bit... <br />
<br />
According to this professor's logic if I had a laptop running at 100C that's like double 57C so that's double the harmful radio waves! And since the graphics card was situated right above my unmentionables we can further multiply the effects of the harmful radio waves by tenfold! <br />
<br />
But that means... <b>OH NO! I'M HITLER!</b>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Over 100C!!!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c370</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:38:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c370</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No point on an old laptop. It was when it overheated in the middle of a game I decided to give my balls a break and buy a desktop. It's graphics card runs at a cool 60C!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c107</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:26:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c107</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[57C hahaha! That's nothing, I've had my laptops old graphics card up in the 100C's!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c250</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:23:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c250</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's an interesting court case to be sure... but the pettiness of the fight between the two women makes it almost unbearable to read! It's like watching children fight except with more adult language.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c598</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:18:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c598</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Firefall is doing fairly well with it's f2p model and it's still in "closed" beta.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c548</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 15:15:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c548</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, not like medicine help, like psychiatric help if he needs it as opposed to throwing him in jail for no reason. If he doesn't then fine, leave him be.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c580</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:57:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c580</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Didn't SWTOR at first fight tooth and nail against going F2P and blamed it's beta testers for it? I mean, it's great that they were proven wrong that a f2p model could work, but I think they felt they were forced into it early on.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c558</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:51:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c558</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[True, path of exile doesn't need a pay2win model that attracts people with inflated e-peens and deep pockets like certain other MMOs...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c405</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:43:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c405</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some people obviously haven't been fanfiction.net, they'd probably have a heart attack! People who fantasize the rape and torture of children are sick and need help, but thankfully their stories are just that, fantasy. Instead of throwing the books at people, why not try and help them instead?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/07262023094/restaurant-facebook-goes-nuclear-facebook-over-reviews-gordon-ramsay-owner-cry-hack.shtml#c1170</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:49:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/07262023094/restaurant-facebook-goes-nuclear-facebook-over-reviews-gordon-ramsay-owner-cry-hack.shtml#c1170</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I suspect the same thing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Quick to Judge and WRONG</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/09590723059/this-weeks-bad-photoshopping-lesson-comes-scientology.shtml#c188</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 22:49:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/09590723059/this-weeks-bad-photoshopping-lesson-comes-scientology.shtml#c188</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ALSO! I don't see how anyone can deny the overhead picture embedded in the article showing only one side? Is this perhaps a case of doublethink?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>