<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by The eejit</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/13315121116/surfthechannel-founder-gets-extra-jail-time-revealing-documents-that-raised-questions-about-his-conviction.shtml#c231</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 04:28:24 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/13315121116/surfthechannel-founder-gets-extra-jail-time-revealing-documents-that-raised-questions-about-his-conviction.shtml#c231</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In the UK, sure.  It takes a crapton less money than stealing fromt he public, though.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Two Words</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/14111021117/company-sues-kickstarter-over-3d-printer-patent-maligns-hackers-makers.shtml#c231</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 02:57:31 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/14111021117/company-sues-kickstarter-over-3d-printer-patent-maligns-hackers-makers.shtml#c231</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Moreover, <i>why patent a 20-year-old process?</i><br />
<br />
Because that'w ehre the money lies.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/09030521112/expose-blatant-security-hole-att-face-five-years-jail.shtml#c274</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 02:56:23 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/09030521112/expose-blatant-security-hole-att-face-five-years-jail.shtml#c274</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm not sure you understand the difference between talk and action,]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/11415521113/40-years-ago-supreme-court-effectively-banned-software-patents-remember-that.shtml#c124</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:34:23 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121121/11415521113/40-years-ago-supreme-court-effectively-banned-software-patents-remember-that.shtml#c124</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I love the fact that he posted them, with no change in, well, anything, and yet <i>he</i> is the one who must be right.  ALWAYS.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20121119/00263721086/one-step-closer-to-real-medical-tech-breakthrough-if-immigration-law-doesnt-get-way.shtml#c66</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:33:10 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20121119/00263721086/one-step-closer-to-real-medical-tech-breakthrough-if-immigration-law-doesnt-get-way.shtml#c66</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And I'm pretty sure Cambridge would be willing to host them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Using &quot;statistics&quot; as propaganda.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121106/12121720952/supplying-missing-ingredient-evidence-based-policymaking-evidence.shtml#c118</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:33:17 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121106/12121720952/supplying-missing-ingredient-evidence-based-policymaking-evidence.shtml#c118</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think we found someone who has no concept of morality, history or, well, anything approaching sanity.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Reverse Streisand Effect</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121120/11023221102/lord-mcalpine-wronged-bbc-demands-10000-people-twitter-pay-up.shtml#c401</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:42:52 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121120/11023221102/lord-mcalpine-wronged-bbc-demands-10000-people-twitter-pay-up.shtml#c401</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's the thing, though: the person it was claimed that he'd abused that made the biggest headlines <i>had said it was a case of mistaken identity</i>.<br />
<br />
I think there's marginally more fo a case here than there has been in pretty much any other case like this we've seen so far.  I still don't think it would get anywhere, but I think that this is one where the case is more "correct".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121120/07580621100/patrick-leahy-caves-to-law-enforcement-amends-ecpa-reform-to-include-loopholes-warrantless-spying.shtml#c162</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:40:21 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121120/07580621100/patrick-leahy-caves-to-law-enforcement-amends-ecpa-reform-to-include-loopholes-warrantless-spying.shtml#c162</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, because if they don't have it, then the RIAA won't be able to steal your bank details so that you can pay them 1560 times for wtaching <i>The Star Wars Trek</i>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: PAY YUR FUCKING DEBTS</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121108/13525520974/copyright-hardliners-adapt-copyright-reform-language-they-just-mean-other-direction.shtml#c93</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 05:04:28 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121108/13525520974/copyright-hardliners-adapt-copyright-reform-language-they-just-mean-other-direction.shtml#c93</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They can't.  That would require making content.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121115/09115121063/app-developer-hijacks-customer-twitter-accounts-attempt-to-shame-pirates.shtml#c312</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:01:53 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121115/09115121063/app-developer-hijacks-customer-twitter-accounts-attempt-to-shame-pirates.shtml#c312</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, at least they didn't get to the "Summon Cthuloid Jesus" step.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121115/09115121063/app-developer-hijacks-customer-twitter-accounts-attempt-to-shame-pirates.shtml#c151</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:58:39 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121115/09115121063/app-developer-hijacks-customer-twitter-accounts-attempt-to-shame-pirates.shtml#c151</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Step 1) Download a legitimate product<br />
Steps 2-11) ???<br />
Step 12) STOP RIGHT THERE, CRIMINAL SCUM!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121118/23364521085/dont-let-retraction-distract-simple-fact-gop-copyright-policy-brief-was-brilliant.shtml#c526</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:10:05 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121118/23364521085/dont-let-retraction-distract-simple-fact-gop-copyright-policy-brief-was-brilliant.shtml#c526</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm not anti-copyright; I'm anti-privilege.<br />
<br />
Get it right.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121117/01181921082/samsung-wants-to-see-details-apples-htc-settlement.shtml#c94</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:59:21 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121117/01181921082/samsung-wants-to-see-details-apples-htc-settlement.shtml#c94</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I cite Morgan freeman as prior art.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121101/13332920909/yes-domain-name-can-be-protected-first-amendment.shtml#c201</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:32:09 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121101/13332920909/yes-domain-name-can-be-protected-first-amendment.shtml#c201</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Try telling that to the DoJ.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121101/13332920909/yes-domain-name-can-be-protected-first-amendment.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:30:55 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121101/13332920909/yes-domain-name-can-be-protected-first-amendment.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So, please remind me again why people should obey proprietary "rights" over native "rights".<br />
<br />
Moreover, your "Harry Potter" example has already been done.  Investigaitn "agents" simply sent a blind DMCa notice in place of, y'know, <i>talking to their marketing department.</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Just keep doing what we've done best.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121117/16492521084/that-was-fast-hollywood-already-browbeat-republicans-into-retracting-report-copyright-reform.shtml#c2259</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:28:03 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121117/16492521084/that-was-fast-hollywood-already-browbeat-republicans-into-retracting-report-copyright-reform.shtml#c2259</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dude, if anyone here was a freehadist, you'd be dead under the weight of billions of free music files that are perfectly legal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stand Firm</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121117/16492521084/that-was-fast-hollywood-already-browbeat-republicans-into-retracting-report-copyright-reform.shtml#c2205</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:23:33 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121117/16492521084/that-was-fast-hollywood-already-browbeat-republicans-into-retracting-report-copyright-reform.shtml#c2205</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[...So <i>why</i> is it signed by the RSC <b>Chairman and subcommittee members</b>?  Or is everyone a Google shill in the GOP?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121117/16492521084/that-was-fast-hollywood-already-browbeat-republicans-into-retracting-report-copyright-reform.shtml#c2189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:20:11 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121117/16492521084/that-was-fast-hollywood-already-browbeat-republicans-into-retracting-report-copyright-reform.shtml#c2189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, it <i>really</i> wasn't.  Go look up your history.  Then come back.  Copyright is a purely mercantilist concept, and anyone saying otherwise is literally an ignoramus who <i>should</i> be ignored.<br />
<br />
Moreover, "because it's the LAW!!!" is not a valid argument either.  Remember the "Rule of Thumb"?  Or the law saying that you could own a person?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/14300021077/unsealed-megaupload-seizure-warrants-reveal-use-flawed-logic-undercover-computer.shtml#c336</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:21:04 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/14300021077/unsealed-megaupload-seizure-warrants-reveal-use-flawed-logic-undercover-computer.shtml#c336</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because the <i>Twihards</i> in the DoJ wanted sparkly Dotcom.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: I couldn't resist...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/14300021077/unsealed-megaupload-seizure-warrants-reveal-use-flawed-logic-undercover-computer.shtml#c311</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The eejit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:17:19 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/14300021077/unsealed-megaupload-seizure-warrants-reveal-use-flawed-logic-undercover-computer.shtml#c311</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, it came pre-loaded with BLU software.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>