<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by Steve R.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>US Arrogance</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/13431923427/dear-politicians-exposing-us-dirty-laundry-isnt-aiding-enemy.shtml#c292</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 06:44:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/13431923427/dear-politicians-exposing-us-dirty-laundry-isnt-aiding-enemy.shtml#c292</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>" the USA government is of the opinion that it can do whatever the hell it likes, to whomsoever it likes,...</i>.  Quite true, the US totally ignores (violates) the sovereignty of other countries.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/13431923427/dear-politicians-exposing-us-dirty-laundry-isnt-aiding-enemy.shtml#c288</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 06:39:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/13431923427/dear-politicians-exposing-us-dirty-laundry-isnt-aiding-enemy.shtml#c288</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Chinese may well be hacking into US Computers. And the US (and media) has been shrilly fanning the flames of "war" and "theft". But the US is doing the same thing!!! The US has no moral high-ground to stand on. <br />
<br />
And along with other scandals, the Obama administration's credibility is in the toilet. So why should we, as a nation, continue to allow ever more onerous restrictions on our civil liberties in the name of security?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Obama's Open and Transparent Government</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/11253223394/former-nsa-boss-this-leak-teaches-world-that-america-cant-keep-secrets.shtml#c456</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:06:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/11253223394/former-nsa-boss-this-leak-teaches-world-that-america-cant-keep-secrets.shtml#c456</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Snowden and Manning are fulfilling Obama's goal that his administration is the most open and transparent. So what's the problem?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Foreign Sovereignty</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/01385123392/author-patriot-act-says-nsa-surveillance-is-abuse-must-end.shtml#c308</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:39:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/01385123392/author-patriot-act-says-nsa-surveillance-is-abuse-must-end.shtml#c308</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A side issue to the "War on Terror" is that the US ignores the sovereignty of foreign countries.  The drone strikes being one example, even if the US has some sort of supposed "approval" to conduct those operations.<br />
<br />
The Washington Post had this headline today: "Merkel, other European leaders raise concerns on U.S. surveillance"<br />
<a href='http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/merkel-other-european-leaders-raise-concerns-on-us-surveillance/2013/06/10/305eddda-d1da-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html?hpid=z1' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/merkel-other-european-leaders-raise-concerns-on-us-surveillance/2013/06/10/305eddda-d1da-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_story.html?hpid=z1</a><br />
<br />
So the issue is not simply purported "rogue" individuals like Snowden or Manning, but how the US treats the rest of the world. For example, the US loudly proclaims that China is committing cyber-security attacks against the US, but the US, as the NSA leaks point-out, is itself committing cyber-security improprieties. The US has lost its moral high ground.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Absolute Power Corrupts</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/01385123392/author-patriot-act-says-nsa-surveillance-is-abuse-must-end.shtml#c218</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:02:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/01385123392/author-patriot-act-says-nsa-surveillance-is-abuse-must-end.shtml#c218</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Privacy is gone. Companies have been doing data-mining for years and occasionally get caught for abusive tactics. The Obama campaign won reelection based, in part, on data-mining. But now the IRS has been exposed as abusing the power of the State for essentially political purposes. <br />
<br />
Based on anecdotal evidence, it shouldn't take a genius to figure out that the NSA (like IRS) snooping activities could be used for nefarious purposes.  (Also don't forget the new facility being built in Utah.  <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center</a>) <br />
<br />
Also how effective has this snooping been? It evidently did not expose the Boston Marathon bombers, the Sandy Hook School mass killer, and it would not likely to be effective against spontaneous acts of terrorism. So is all this supposed snooping actually cost-effective?<br />
<br />
So do we allow a police state in the name of supposed security that has the potential to be used for nefarious purposes (despite the denials)?????????? I say not.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Does Obama Mean It?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130604/00412423310/president-obamas-comes-out-strongly-against-patent-trolls-here-are-details.shtml#c514</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 4 Jun 2013 10:45:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130604/00412423310/president-obamas-comes-out-strongly-against-patent-trolls-here-are-details.shtml#c514</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Obama is a <b>populist</b>, he offers the adoring masses <i>"candy"</i> to solicit votes. Obama knows how to and is extremely effective at selling populist concepts, but will he actually invest time and effort to pursue fighting patent trolls??? I doubt it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: And why do we care if we own it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130319/02474422373/fight-isnt-about-unlocking-mobile-phones-whether-you-actually-own-what-you-bought.shtml#c528</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:58:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130319/02474422373/fight-isnt-about-unlocking-mobile-phones-whether-you-actually-own-what-you-bought.shtml#c528</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There is a slight twist to this. In theory, the content is supposed to fall into the public domain after a limited period of time. So you as a member of the public would "own" the content after the copyright privilege has expired. I would advocate, that those who have extended the scope and time-span of copyright have been "stealing" from you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Good News! Student Wins Supreme Court Copyright Decision</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130319/02474422373/fight-isnt-about-unlocking-mobile-phones-whether-you-actually-own-what-you-bought.shtml#c438</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:52:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130319/02474422373/fight-isnt-about-unlocking-mobile-phones-whether-you-actually-own-what-you-bought.shtml#c438</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From the Los Angeles Times.  Maybe our ownership rights are still holding on.<br />
<br />
<i>"A former USC student who bought textbooks in his homeland of Thailand and sold them in the United States won a major Supreme Court ruling on copyright law that gives foreign buyers of textbooks, movies and other products a right to resell them in the United States without the permission of the copyright owner."</i><br />
<br />
<a href='http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2013/03/supreme-court-decision-copyright.html' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2013/03/supreme-court-decision-copyright.html</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Media Cognitive Dissonance</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130208/18082821928/two-famous-journalism-institutions-shame-themselves-not-standing-up-basic-fair-use.shtml#c329</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:39:39 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130208/18082821928/two-famous-journalism-institutions-shame-themselves-not-standing-up-basic-fair-use.shtml#c329</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The media, depends on fair use and the free flow of information, yet they display a poor understanding of copyright law and attempt to privatize their content.<br />
<br />
For example, when SOPA/ACTA was running "hot" as a National issue, FOX News had a panel of so-called pundits discuss the copyright law. What floored me, was the call for compromise. Not once was it mentioned that copyright has grown ever "strong". But piracy has. So the obvious implication by the word compromise was the continued trend towards an ever stronger version of copyright. The logical approach of comprise; to restore copyright to its original intent was never raised.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Non-Existent Customer Service</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130127/19023721799/redditor-points-out-flaws-simcitys-online-only-drm-gets-banned-ea-his-troubles.shtml#c227</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:07:32 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130127/19023721799/redditor-points-out-flaws-simcitys-online-only-drm-gets-banned-ea-his-troubles.shtml#c227</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As a similar experience. A while ago, on impulse I unthinkingly bought CIV5, only to find it to be DRM "crippled". The game gave the user NO option to obtain a refund if the terms-of-service were declined. Obviously, this raises a fundamental question; if DRM is meant to prevent unauthorized use, then the customer should be able to get a refund if they decline to accept the TOS since they can't use the product without the DRM.<br />
<br />
Anyway, I left my complaint on the ??? website, which remained unanswered by the company for several months. After some complaining, one staff person was honest enough to simply say (paraphrased): "my sympathies, but you are screwed.". Without going into a long discussion, my credit card company did give me a courtesy refund. Unfortunately, that does not teach companies such as EA a lesson in customer service.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Maybe There is Hope</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121119/10282021093/rep-darrell-issa-wants-to-make-it-clear-that-youre-allowed-to-rip-your-dvds.shtml#c274</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:47:09 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121119/10282021093/rep-darrell-issa-wants-to-make-it-clear-that-youre-allowed-to-rip-your-dvds.shtml#c274</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Now that the election is over, I wonder if Obama will resurrect things like SOPA/ACTA at the inauguration speech.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Insanity Will Get Worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120717/02364219725/insanity-romneys-ad-featuring-obama-singing-al-green-shut-down-via-copyright-claim.shtml#c850</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:08:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120717/02364219725/insanity-romneys-ad-featuring-obama-singing-al-green-shut-down-via-copyright-claim.shtml#c850</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In terms of SOPA, both Obama and Romney made a temporary tactical retreat based on public outrage. It didn't change their minds. Romney has been absolutely livid concerning the "theft" by China of so-called "Intellectual Property". <br />
<br />
Irrespective of who wins the election, I expect a re-emergence of proposals for ever "stronger" legislation to protect so-called "intellectual property".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Running a race backwards</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120703/10500719565/you-cant-introduce-any-decently-cool-product-these-days-without-some-sore-loser-claiming-patent-infringement.shtml#c232</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:01:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120703/10500719565/you-cant-introduce-any-decently-cool-product-these-days-without-some-sore-loser-claiming-patent-infringement.shtml#c232</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good analogy. My daughters are into cross-country and bicycling competition.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>After the Presidential Election??????</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120703/10500719565/you-cant-introduce-any-decently-cool-product-these-days-without-some-sore-loser-claiming-patent-infringement.shtml#c204</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:24:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120703/10500719565/you-cant-introduce-any-decently-cool-product-these-days-without-some-sore-loser-claiming-patent-infringement.shtml#c204</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Romney has been really fanning the flames of outrage that China is "stealing" so-called "intellectual property".<br />
<br />
Obama, himself did an ersatz temporary strategic retreat from SOPA/PIPA.<br />
<br />
After the election I assume that the protection of so-called "intellectual property" will be reinvigorated. The lawyers will be happy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Full Circle</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120709/00100219617/chinese-companies-again-using-patents-to-punish-foreign-competitors-apple-sued-over-siri-shanghai.shtml#c246</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2012 13:53:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120709/00100219617/chinese-companies-again-using-patents-to-punish-foreign-competitors-apple-sued-over-siri-shanghai.shtml#c246</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What comes around goes around. Those who advocate "strong" so-called "intellectual property" rights will die by them. This is a particularly losing proposition for the US as other countries develop their own "portfolios" of so-called "intellectual property" and the US portfolio declines.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>So Much For Innovation</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120623/00213319445/judge-posner-rips-apart-apples-patent-litigation-strategy-being-really-annoyed-is-no-reason-to-sue.shtml#c81</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 05:37:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120623/00213319445/judge-posner-rips-apart-apples-patent-litigation-strategy-being-really-annoyed-is-no-reason-to-sue.shtml#c81</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The emergence of so-called "intellectual property" is about castrating competition not promoting progress in the arts and sciences.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120621/19013019422/apple-reveals-new-iphone-connector-port-thus-wiping-out-several-generations-accessories-one-fell-swoop.shtml#c898</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:06:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120621/19013019422/apple-reveals-new-iphone-connector-port-thus-wiping-out-several-generations-accessories-one-fell-swoop.shtml#c898</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If customer satisfaction was a true company imperative, it would not make proprietary connectors. As a general observation many companies do NOT care about the individual consumer anymore. They tend to be somewhat responsive when consumers abandon them in mass.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>No Surprise</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120621/19013019422/apple-reveals-new-iphone-connector-port-thus-wiping-out-several-generations-accessories-one-fell-swoop.shtml#c847</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 06:28:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20120621/19013019422/apple-reveals-new-iphone-connector-port-thus-wiping-out-several-generations-accessories-one-fell-swoop.shtml#c847</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was anticipating that would be the case when I heard a reviewer on TV use the buzz word <i>"new"</i>.<br />
<br />
Also in the news: <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2012/6/20/3096945/windows-phone-7-8-upgrade-no-windows-phone-8-existing-devices" rel="nofollow">Microsoft: It</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>No to Software Patents</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120619/18131819392/eff-launches-defend-innovation-site-attempt-to-fix-software-patents.shtml#c285</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:59:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20120619/18131819392/eff-launches-defend-innovation-site-attempt-to-fix-software-patents.shtml#c285</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My problem with the EFF proposal is that is acknowledges the existence of this type of patent. This starts the whole line of slippery slope arguments that the patents have to be "strengthened" to protect the patent holder. NO to software patents.<br />
<br />
A second issue that requires further review is that there can only be "one" patent holder. We live in a world economy with a world population in excess of 6 Billion people. Given that, many people can "invent" the same thing. If that is the case there should be NO patent or at least a shared patent.<br />
<br />
Finally, any patent that is issued must be supported by a real device with real blueprints. A third party should be able to take that blueprint and construct that device. If they can't then NO patent.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Rule of Law and Due Process are Being Eliminated</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120521/03345318988/youre-only-making-things-worse-yourself-us-too-media-industries-part-ii.shtml#c1120</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve R.]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 09:20:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120521/03345318988/youre-only-making-things-worse-yourself-us-too-media-industries-part-ii.shtml#c1120</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Larry wrote: <i>"Yet traditional forms of legal enforcement have become nearly impossible."</i>. To get around the impediment of traditional methods of copyright enforcement, infringement for one has been criminalized instead of simply being a civil violation. So we now have the State involved in propping up the revenue stream of corporations.<br />
<br />
Not only that but third parties, such as the ISP, are now being required to <i>"filter"</i> and or <i>"read"</i> internet content. Basically <b>wiretapping</b>. <br />
<br />
Furthermore, we are seeing the emergence of <i>"automated justice"</i>. Basically, if some entity "X" says that you have infringed without any valid proof, ISP "Y" is required to take-down the content and wait for the "offender" to respond and provide proof that the entity "X" actually made a false accusation. (How one can force a third party to act as private law enforcement is beyond me.)<br />
<br />
This turns our judicial process upside down. It used to be that the complaining entity had to provide proof and take it to court and try the evidence before an adverse action could be taken. Now one can have an adverse action imposed without a trial and the <i>"offender"</i> then has to defend themselves to rescind that adverse action.<br />
<br />
The Washington Times had an editorial condemning cameras that record people going through red lights because in many cases they did not work properly. The Washington Times cited one person defending the use of the cameras who basically said: <b>"Our concern is not justice but maximizing revenue."</b> Similarly, with copyright and patent law, the rule of law and due process are being sacrificed to maximize revenue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>