<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by Tim K</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Once again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/03220823047/mpaa-freaks-out-insists-that-having-to-consider-fair-use-before-filing-dmca-takedown-would-be-crazy.shtml#c37</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 07:21:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/03220823047/mpaa-freaks-out-insists-that-having-to-consider-fair-use-before-filing-dmca-takedown-would-be-crazy.shtml#c37</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Difficult for MPAA to differentiate between infringing and non-infringing material, but everyone else should still easily be able to know immediately what's infringing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Oh really?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130415/11111822710/white-house-petition-launched-to-recast-copyright-digital-age.shtml#c527</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:29:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130415/11111822710/white-house-petition-launched-to-recast-copyright-digital-age.shtml#c527</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[a]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Oh really?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130415/11111822710/white-house-petition-launched-to-recast-copyright-digital-age.shtml#c139</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:29:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130415/11111822710/white-house-petition-launched-to-recast-copyright-digital-age.shtml#c139</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>professionals are abandoning the web.</i><br />
<br />
What world do you live in?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130315/11044122339/apples-patent-creating-leak-proof-data-pipe-why-its-doomed-to-fail.shtml#c578</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:09:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130315/11044122339/apples-patent-creating-leak-proof-data-pipe-why-its-doomed-to-fail.shtml#c578</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>That technology has been around for years. Why is Apple trying to patent it now?</i> <br />
<br />
That's SOP for Apple. Followed by suing everyone else.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: You CAN'T disagree that &quot;it facilitates piracy&quot;.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130320/16033322402/motion-picture-association-cloud-is-threat-to-us-best-response-is-censorship.shtml#c174</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:02:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130320/16033322402/motion-picture-association-cloud-is-threat-to-us-best-response-is-censorship.shtml#c174</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Computers, hard drives, flash drives, the internet all facilitate piracy. What's your point?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130320/16033322402/motion-picture-association-cloud-is-threat-to-us-best-response-is-censorship.shtml#c12</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 06:39:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130320/16033322402/motion-picture-association-cloud-is-threat-to-us-best-response-is-censorship.shtml#c12</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>The cloud also represents a threat in that it facilitates piracy, and the pirates seem to have gotten into this space first</i><br />
<br />
Who would have guessed that? Probably because Hollywood doesn't actually come up with new tech other than tech to try and screw their customers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: And so too will VPNs &quot;pipes&quot; be cracked!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130315/11044122339/apples-patent-creating-leak-proof-data-pipe-why-its-doomed-to-fail.shtml#c270</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 06:34:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130315/11044122339/apples-patent-creating-leak-proof-data-pipe-why-its-doomed-to-fail.shtml#c270</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>By the way, ever notice how much focus here is on keeping identity hidden? The most obvious purpose is so you can download infringed content.</i><br />
Says the person who is always on this site commenting, but never creates an account. Obviously OOTB must be pirating this site!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: To Tim it's academic: to her and employees, it's LOST income.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130318/17590622369/indie-film-distributor-spends-half-her-profits-sending-dmca-takedowns-is-it-worth-it.shtml#c1026</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:32:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130318/17590622369/indie-film-distributor-spends-half-her-profits-sending-dmca-takedowns-is-it-worth-it.shtml#c1026</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Could the same be accomplished at half the price? How about $10,000 per year? Or $0? ... Kathy Wolfe has obviously worked hard to keep Wolfe Films running for more than a quarter-decade. She deserves a salary and I hate to see that money flowing into an effort that's not paying off.</i><br />
<br />
Yeah...What a dick]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: To Tim it's academic: to her and employees, it's LOST income.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130318/17590622369/indie-film-distributor-spends-half-her-profits-sending-dmca-takedowns-is-it-worth-it.shtml#c131</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:30:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130318/17590622369/indie-film-distributor-spends-half-her-profits-sending-dmca-takedowns-is-it-worth-it.shtml#c131</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Saying something is a fact does not make it so. Hence the desire for the actual numbers/research she used to come to that conclusion]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>In the wrong business</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130318/17590622369/indie-film-distributor-spends-half-her-profits-sending-dmca-takedowns-is-it-worth-it.shtml#c48</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:09:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130318/17590622369/indie-film-distributor-spends-half-her-profits-sending-dmca-takedowns-is-it-worth-it.shtml#c48</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[$30K for sending probably mostly automated DMCA. Which does nothing because as she stated, after taking down links more popped up the next day. So you have ridiculous money, one would assume not much work after the initial setup of your DMCA bots, and guaranteed work because people will just keep reposting links, and content owners will continue throwing money at it hoping that they are actually doing something that helps.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Spotify</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130227/01483822127/music-industry-data-sales-up-piracy-down-its-not-because-any-anti-piracy-efforts.shtml#c51</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:35:01 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130227/01483822127/music-industry-data-sales-up-piracy-down-its-not-because-any-anti-piracy-efforts.shtml#c51</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I listen to about 95% of my music through spotify, and I pay the $5 a month for no commercials. The other 5% is from driving around and listening to the radio. So pretty much spotify is the reason I don't need to buy/download/whatever music anymore, not anything else that the music industry might claim.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: HBO Go != Netflix Competitor</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130114/18442221671/dear-hbo-disney-netflix-et-al-fragmenting-online-tv-lets-piracy-keep-its-biggest-advantage.shtml#c416</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 08:09:11 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130114/18442221671/dear-hbo-disney-netflix-et-al-fragmenting-online-tv-lets-piracy-keep-its-biggest-advantage.shtml#c416</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I would think that the 10 year deal with Universal would prevent that, since the whole point is to force people to continue paying for cable. If HBO just bypasses that for their own service without Netflix, Universal is just as screwed as if they went to Netflix]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>HBO Go != Netflix Competitor</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130114/18442221671/dear-hbo-disney-netflix-et-al-fragmenting-online-tv-lets-piracy-keep-its-biggest-advantage.shtml#c161</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 07:28:07 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130114/18442221671/dear-hbo-disney-netflix-et-al-fragmenting-online-tv-lets-piracy-keep-its-biggest-advantage.shtml#c161</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>I think people are missing the larger idea of what's happening here, and that's HBO becoming the closest thing Netflix has to a direct competitor. The groundwork is already in place with the aforementioned Go service. Add in exclusive access to movies from all those studios, and $15 a month for HBO Go starts looking nearly as appealing as $15 a month for Netflix.</i><br />
<br />
I don't consider that a competitor at all, certainly not one for the same price. Because in order to get that you need the $100+ cable package, which is why it will never compete directly against Netflix.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130101/16214221533/faa-facing-more-pressure-to-change-its-rules-electronic-device-usage.shtml#c52</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:47:40 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130101/16214221533/faa-facing-more-pressure-to-change-its-rules-electronic-device-usage.shtml#c52</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If having the device active was all it took to potentially take down a plane then their rules wouldn't do jack shit to prevent that anyways. I've listened to my phone (in airplane mode) while taking off, all you have to do is have a hoodie on. They can't stop that, so how would they stop someone trying to 'take down the plane' by having the device on, when they could just leave it in their pocket or face down, and they wouldn't even know it's on. And an electronic device doesn't hurt more when it's turned on, just an fyi to the FAA]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: This is just incorrect</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121105/17594020942/when-mouse-requires-internet-connection-youre-doing-cloud-wrong.shtml#c339</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 7 Nov 2012 06:35:24 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121105/17594020942/when-mouse-requires-internet-connection-youre-doing-cloud-wrong.shtml#c339</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Isn't the whole point of spending all that money for the advanced features, Which the other Tim said in the article <i> No one spends $80 for a "plug and play" mouse (or over $300 with the keyboard -- which also requires a connection and an account).</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Zero?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121024/20333720816/exploring-earnings-humble-bundle-author.shtml#c214</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:15:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20121024/20333720816/exploring-earnings-humble-bundle-author.shtml#c214</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> It was published in 2005</i><br />
$20k for a 7 (almost 8) year old book in a week (or two, don't remember how long this bundle was)? That's pretty damn good if you ask me. Not to mention Bob just ignores most everything that doesn't go well with his 'argument']]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: That's a narrow niche: wait until China copies 'em.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121016/17395020723/why-hardware-patent-trolls-may-be-next-big-problem.shtml#c236</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:53:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121016/17395020723/why-hardware-patent-trolls-may-be-next-big-problem.shtml#c236</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have you never heard of the CwF thing they have talked about here? That's exactly what this is about. CW&amp;T connected with their fans, and appealed to them to not support the other company who copied. If CW&amp;T had been a shitty company, I doubt people would have really cared too much about supporting CW&amp;T vs another company. But yeah, Mike never talks about that and is totally against it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Boring news?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121019/07505220761/brazilian-newspapers-apparently-dont-want-traffic-they-all-opt-out-google-news.shtml#c36</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:56:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121019/07505220761/brazilian-newspapers-apparently-dont-want-traffic-they-all-opt-out-google-news.shtml#c36</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>by providing the first few lines of our stories to Internet users, the service reduces the chances that they will look at the entire story in our web sites</i><br />
<br />
Is the news so boring that after a few lines they are don't want to read any more than the first couple lines?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Let's not &quot;push it&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121017/17101320738/apparently-if-you-explain-many-ways-that-artists-can-make-money-outside-copyright-youre-against-artists-getting-paid.shtml#c70</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:50:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121017/17101320738/apparently-if-you-explain-many-ways-that-artists-can-make-money-outside-copyright-youre-against-artists-getting-paid.shtml#c70</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A lot of those examples in this article had nothing to do with concerts...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: BUT the whole field just keeps growing!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20121017/10480520734/there-are-250000-active-patents-that-impact-smartphones-representing-one-six-active-patents-today.shtml#c299</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim K]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:51:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20121017/10480520734/there-are-250000-active-patents-that-impact-smartphones-representing-one-six-active-patents-today.shtml#c299</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nobody said it was completely stopping innovation. We have said several times that they are slowing/hindering innovation. How much faster would it grow if they spent more money on innovating than on lawsuits? How many more startups would be successful if they didn't have to worry about being sued out of existence because of the cost, not because of a valid claim.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>