<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by Arsik Vek</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c36</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:30:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c36</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Clearly all those petitions to ban dihydrogen monoxide were right.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c72</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:24:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c72</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Holy balls (to oppose the Testicilians).... this guy is nuts.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c10</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 05:17:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c10</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's my question: Why is this getting so much attention when there are semi-concealed security cameras all over almost every major city recording everything that goes on in or outside?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/02114423045/some-data-big-kickstarter-projects-famous-people-actually-helps-other-projects.shtml#c285</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:35:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130511/02114423045/some-data-big-kickstarter-projects-famous-people-actually-helps-other-projects.shtml#c285</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Big names getting into Kickstarter are fantastic. I discovered it during the Project: Eternity kickstarter, and have gone on to pledge almost $5k across 14 projects.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/15163123086/did-paul-duffys-wife-admit-that-duffy-was-engaged-interstate-extortion-facebook.shtml#c22</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 05:47:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/15163123086/did-paul-duffys-wife-admit-that-duffy-was-engaged-interstate-extortion-facebook.shtml#c22</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Duffy's next comment: "I'm not sure who that woman is. She may or may not be my wife, but I have no direct knowledge of any relationship."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130430/22361622903/warner-bros-mgm-universal-collectively-pull-nearly-2000-films-netflix-to-further-fragment-online-movie-market.shtml#c134</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 May 2013 10:11:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130430/22361622903/warner-bros-mgm-universal-collectively-pull-nearly-2000-films-netflix-to-further-fragment-online-movie-market.shtml#c134</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're partially right. This is to piss people off. But they're not going to get pissed at Warner. They're going to get pissed at Netflix. The average person is terrible at following causal chains. Nor are they likely to realize it's Warner pulling it's movies without going looking for it. They'll just see "Netflix used to give me this movie, now it doesn't. Netflix sucks."<br />
<br />
Warner wants to drive people out of VOD entirely by ruining their trust that it will continue to provide value.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130424/16513222825/how-eas-silent-treatment-pushed-simcity-story-into-background.shtml#c31</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 07:06:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130424/16513222825/how-eas-silent-treatment-pushed-simcity-story-into-background.shtml#c31</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There comes a point, in any argument that runs long enough, where the best thing you can do is shut up. That it's the <b>best</b> thing doesn't mean shutting up is a <b>good</b> thing, though. A company interested in maintaining a good relationship with its customer base (EA has demonstrated that it is not one of these) should not let things get to the point where fans look at anything coming out of the company is either a lie, wrong, or meaningless pacifying.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130417/10325622744/canadian-house-member-removed-threats-she-didnt-make-facebook-group-she-didnt-join.shtml#c23</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 06:38:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130417/10325622744/canadian-house-member-removed-threats-she-didnt-make-facebook-group-she-didnt-join.shtml#c23</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, you can be added to a group without any action on your part, I was added to several by friends (Admittedly, most of them were things I didn't object to being in). I suspect there's an option somewhere in the privacy settings to change that, but I'll be damned if I can find it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130408/10133522624/ea-coo-we-get-votes-worst-company-because-were-awesome-voters-are-homophobes.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:20:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130408/10133522624/ea-coo-we-get-votes-worst-company-because-were-awesome-voters-are-homophobes.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, the won the matchup this year again. 64% to 36% against Bank of America. Clearly it's because people just don't understand how awesome they are.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/16085022605/veoh-still-not-dead-enough-universal-music-asks-court-to-rehear-case-yet-again.shtml#c184</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Apr 2013 08:07:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/16085022605/veoh-still-not-dead-enough-universal-music-asks-court-to-rehear-case-yet-again.shtml#c184</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, it's nice to be able to just buy competition out of the market. Whether they want it or not. /s]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/16085022605/veoh-still-not-dead-enough-universal-music-asks-court-to-rehear-case-yet-again.shtml#c62</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Apr 2013 07:07:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/16085022605/veoh-still-not-dead-enough-universal-music-asks-court-to-rehear-case-yet-again.shtml#c62</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>shifts the burden of online copyright enforcement to content owners</i><br />
<br />
You don't need to read any further than this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:  not that satisfying</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/11110922599/transcript-12-minute-were-done-prenda-hearing-released.shtml#c43</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 5 Apr 2013 13:06:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130405/11110922599/transcript-12-minute-were-done-prenda-hearing-released.shtml#c43</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don't worry. I suspect there will be a sequel.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130402/04333522547/amazon-refuses-to-publish-first-cornish-language-ebook.shtml#c303</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:49:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130402/04333522547/amazon-refuses-to-publish-first-cornish-language-ebook.shtml#c303</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If Amazon has an acceptible use policy, they don't have the responsibility to validate that the content meets it, but they do have the right to. Unless you're suggesting that Amazon as a retailer should be compelled to carry any product someone wants them to. Would you also suggest that any publishers he sent the book to should be compelled to produce the book? If I go to Amazon because I want to sell a flaming, spiked, triple-ended dildo, should they be required to carry that as well? Amazon does not have a requirement to carry any product someone wants to sell on it. Refusing to carry a book that does not meet preexisting publication requirements is not censorship of the book. Seeking to prevent anyone from carrying it is, but that's not what's going on here.<br />
<br />
<br />
Is it bad PR? Maybe. Has Amazon done something terrible? No.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130403/16412622564/copyright-as-censorship-university-threatens-own-faculty-with-copyright-infringement-campus-survey.shtml#c15</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Apr 2013 05:58:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130403/16412622564/copyright-as-censorship-university-threatens-own-faculty-with-copyright-infringement-campus-survey.shtml#c15</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I dunno, you've gotta be pretty creative to ask the questions in such a way as to get the answer you want, instead of the truth.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130402/04333522547/amazon-refuses-to-publish-first-cornish-language-ebook.shtml#c114</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Apr 2013 20:41:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130402/04333522547/amazon-refuses-to-publish-first-cornish-language-ebook.shtml#c114</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm not really sure I can work up any outrage over this. Amazon only has a couple of (admittedly broad and subjective) content restrictions (available at <a href='https://kdp.amazon.com/self-publishing/help?topicId=A2TOZW0SV7IR1U' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://kdp.amazon.com/self-publishing/help?topicId=A2TOZW0SV7IR1U</a> ). If they don't have anyone who can validate that the content meets these requirements, I don't think I have much problem with them choosing not to carry it. They're pretty up front about only supporting a half dozen or so languages, so it's not like they're singling out Cornish.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130329/06083122509/belgium-we-want-to-be-champagne-chocolate.shtml#c147</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:47:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130329/06083122509/belgium-we-want-to-be-champagne-chocolate.shtml#c147</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[First the chocolate. Next, Belgian waffles.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130329/10322622512/nato-cyberwar-manual-says-hackers-must-wear-uniform.shtml#c153</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 1 Apr 2013 10:15:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130329/10322622512/nato-cyberwar-manual-says-hackers-must-wear-uniform.shtml#c153</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>In theory it would also apply to people like drone pilots.</i><br />
<br />
Why not? They're already getting flight pay and their wings like real pilots.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2009/10/airforce_uas_career_100909w/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2009/10/airforce_uas_career_100909w/</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130328/05304422492/ea-labels-president-drm-is-failed-strategy-simcity-didnt-have-any-drm.shtml#c7</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:49:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130328/05304422492/ea-labels-president-drm-is-failed-strategy-simcity-didnt-have-any-drm.shtml#c7</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think you summed up my response to this quite well....<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
wut?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130316/02363422348/righthaven-copyrights-sold-back-to-stephens-media-80k-to-pay-legal-fees.shtml#c20</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:55:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130316/02363422348/righthaven-copyrights-sold-back-to-stephens-media-80k-to-pay-legal-fees.shtml#c20</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So, to make sure I'm getting this right....<br />
<br />
1) Stephens Media decides to get them some of that awesome copyright trolling money.<br />
2) Stephens Media spawns Righthaven.<br />
3) Stephens Media takes their box o' copyright, dumps out all the contents, then sells Righthaven the empty cardboard box.<br />
4) Righthaven brandishes the empty cardboard box in a threatening fashion demanding money.<br />
5) Court says that's fscking retarded, demands Righthaven pay back legal fees.<br />
6) Righthaven puts the empty box over their head and pretends they can't hear.<br />
7) Court takes Righthaven away and starts auctioning it off. Realizes it has no assets except an empty cardboard box.<br />
8) Randazza takes the empty cardboard box and sells it back to Stephens Media for $80k.<br />
<br />
In the end, Stephens Media donates eighty thousand dollars and it's reputation to Randazza for no appreciable gain. Well done.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130312/14452222301/no-sim-city-debacle-doesnt-mean-gamers-need-bill-rights.shtml#c14</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:51:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130312/14452222301/no-sim-city-debacle-doesnt-mean-gamers-need-bill-rights.shtml#c14</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["1. Gamers have the right not to give money to assholes"<br />
<br />
<br />
Sadly, though they have the right, many do not have the ability. They find themselves helplessly compelled to fling money at whatever the newest, shiniest thing is. Feel pity for these poor folk, with their lack of restraint and good sense.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>