<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by Jon Lawrence</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Sooo disappointed</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121101/20074920913/amazon-freaks-out-about-sock-puppet-reviews-deletes-bunch-real-reviews.shtml#c108</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:34:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121101/20074920913/amazon-freaks-out-about-sock-puppet-reviews-deletes-bunch-real-reviews.shtml#c108</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I actually was hoping they were reviews by *real* sock puppets. That's a review I would watch; if perhaps not really listen to...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thank you sir, May I have another?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120206/03573117666/can-we-count-ways-which-lowes-license-agreement-linking-to-its-site-is-insane.shtml#c492</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:54:52 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120206/03573117666/can-we-count-ways-which-lowes-license-agreement-linking-to-its-site-is-insane.shtml#c492</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, I wanted just one more reason to NOT shop at my local Lowes, and that about does it.<br />
<br />
Thanks for helping make my shopping decisions easy!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bring on the Popcorn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120203/06001517649/is-us-meddling-polish-acta-voting.shtml#c75</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:31:32 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120203/06001517649/is-us-meddling-polish-acta-voting.shtml#c75</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[All I need now is a comfy seat and a soda to sit back and watch the comedy unfold.  :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>yeah, weird, neither has my &quot;guild&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120103/11314417262/ea-we-have-never-taken-position-either-way-sopa-pipa.shtml#c248</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:44:51 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120103/11314417262/ea-we-have-never-taken-position-either-way-sopa-pipa.shtml#c248</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As it stands, I can't find any official position from the Producers Guild of America either.  I asked for one on their Twitter stream, no answer yet; but don't expect one.  It would be good to hear if we have one so I can hasten my exit;)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111230/23592317245/hollywood-union-members-sign-petition-asking-mpaa-hollywood-unions-to-stop-supporting-pipasopa.shtml#c663</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 3 Jan 2012 12:37:50 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111230/23592317245/hollywood-union-members-sign-petition-asking-mpaa-hollywood-unions-to-stop-supporting-pipasopa.shtml#c663</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You should believe it.  The communication channels from union leaders to their members is generally awful, and once in a while bubbles up to only slightly bad.  <br />
<br />
I've worked with a lot of IATSE members and they are regularly surprised by things their "leadership" does.<br />
<br />
Also interesting to note that my own industry trade association (not a union), the Producers Guild of America, seems to have taken no public stance on this issue; which makes me wonder if they're using my annual dues to fund lobbying on behalf of SOPA... hm.  <br />
<br />
I better ask.<br />
<br />
(and let's see if anyone there responds: <a href='http://twitter.com/#!/MPGjon/status/154300218865754113' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/#!/MPGjon/status/154300218865754113</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111212/02441617038/problem-worse-than-piracy-ridiculous-structure-online-music-licensing-deals.shtml#c826</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:45:11 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111212/02441617038/problem-worse-than-piracy-ridiculous-structure-online-music-licensing-deals.shtml#c826</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This comment is a little disingenuous; I've licensed a LOT of music for traditional television and film use, and the terms Mike's talking about in my experience have been similar in negotiations.<br />
<br />
If you read the online music agreements at ASCAP or BMI (and that's royalty collecting only), you will see they are indeed structured as Mike points out above.<br />
<br />
Here's the links for yourselves:<br />
<a href='http://www.ascap.com/licensing/digital/reports/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.ascap.com/licensing/digital/reports/</a><br />
<a href='http://www.bmi.com/licensing/entry/549538' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.bmi.com/licensing/entry/549538</a><br />
<br />
Convoluted JUNK.<br />
<br />
Here's a fun one; my favorite - the Gross Revenue reporting form:<br />
<a href='http://www.bmi.com/forms/licensing/newmedia/web_gross_rev_quarterly.pdf' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.bmi.com/forms/licensing/newmedia/web_gross_rev_quarterly.pdf</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Fundamental Problem</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/02544416380/warner-bros-buys-story-that-was-written-reddit-comments-then-tells-author-to-stop-redditing.shtml#c531</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:19:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/02544416380/warner-bros-buys-story-that-was-written-reddit-comments-then-tells-author-to-stop-redditing.shtml#c531</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, and I'll adjust my argument.  Obviously not ALL network and studio execs think/know their business models are in trouble.  <br />
<br />
Some prefer life with their heads in their sand - most have 10, 20 years max until they're out, retired with lots of money or dead; so the longer they can keep their legacy gravy train rolling and then jump off and let the new guys figure it out, the better for them.<br />
<br />
All good for them; but probably not so good for the long term sustainability of the companies they "lead."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Fundamental Problem</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/02544416380/warner-bros-buys-story-that-was-written-reddit-comments-then-tells-author-to-stop-redditing.shtml#c524</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:13:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/02544416380/warner-bros-buys-story-that-was-written-reddit-comments-then-tells-author-to-stop-redditing.shtml#c524</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nice ad hominem there.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hey, Stephens Media, YOU got any money?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/00523316377/righthaven-still-trying-to-avoid-paying-any-legal-fees-those-it-illegally-sued.shtml#c153</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:11:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/00523316377/righthaven-still-trying-to-avoid-paying-any-legal-fees-those-it-illegally-sued.shtml#c153</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Would be sweet justice to see the judge extend the judgement to reach in and make Stephens Media pay if Righthaven absolutely cannot:)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fundamental Problem</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/02544416380/warner-bros-buys-story-that-was-written-reddit-comments-then-tells-author-to-stop-redditing.shtml#c393</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:25:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111017/02544416380/warner-bros-buys-story-that-was-written-reddit-comments-then-tells-author-to-stop-redditing.shtml#c393</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[THIS is THE fundamental problem with legacy media today.  <br />
<br />
I'm a Producers Guild member - and time and time again, the network and studio execs all know their business model is broken, but can't figure out how to fix it. <br />
<br />
It all boils down to a business that requires 100% lockdown on every bit of IP and creativity; they *will not relinquish or share any lick of control* with content creators.<br />
<br />
This is the #1 reason they will eventually fail.  <br />
<br />
Adapting means giving up some level of control, because they no longer hold *all the keys* to the kingdom of content distribution.  And they are not (yet) willing to cede any level of control, even when doing so could be a big net benefit for them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Positively Winklevossian</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110722/13365015215/one-more-time-with-feeling-winklevii-lose-yet-again.shtml#c125</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:51:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110722/13365015215/one-more-time-with-feeling-winklevii-lose-yet-again.shtml#c125</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Got to use that term today to describe an entitled dbag action by someone.  Gonna start using it a lot.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ephemera = Culture</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110530/22174414466/how-important-is-it-to-preserve-our-digital-heritage.shtml#c150</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 4 Jun 2011 00:13:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110530/22174414466/how-important-is-it-to-preserve-our-digital-heritage.shtml#c150</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow, great question.  <br />
<br />
And while I understand that it's not in LoC's purview nor budget to catalog and archive what IS our ever-evolving digital culture at any given moment, it's a great point to be brought up.<br />
<br />
I actually HAVE my 1995 original GeoCities website (Soho/8499) backed up on a data disc.  It's hilarious, somewhat sad, and accurate to look back on the images and text included as a viable-to-be-cataloged moment in time of digital culture.<br />
<br />
That said, how the heck would one go about that? I have no idea; other than to guess it would take a helluva lot of data storage and money.<br />
<br />
Even worse (and slightly off-topic) is the number of old film &amp; television series we are going to loose, that will never get to be public-domained because the studios and networks *literally* can't find the right paperwork that allows them to create digital copies.  There's a LOT of this media, that is going to disappear.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110424/22422314018/tv-people-realizing-that-internet-is-global.shtml#c203</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 21:52:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110424/22422314018/tv-people-realizing-that-internet-is-global.shtml#c203</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What is this "internationally accepted" ad you speak of? ;)<br />
<br />
It does not exist.  There's a large # of reasons that international sales are just that, sales to territories.  And while money is one of them, regionalization (think, digital personalization) is one of them.  Subtitling, dubbing into other languages, culturally acceptable ad sales materials, etc. are others.<br />
<br />
Now, that's not a defense of the way thing are now, but there really truly *are* things that can and should be "value adds" in regional sales of content in a global market.  <br />
<br />
But generally speaking, regional distribs/resellers (if you will) of content are far further behind the tech curve than we are; so to suggest these newer digital models to the middlemen (who really can add some local value), really threatens their own businesses, and on top of that, they're not technically capable of delivering to their broader audience in ways that provide good experiences to their audience and still satisfies tracking and reporting (at the very least, even forgetting DRM, which the US rightsholders are, of course, unwilling to do) requirements.<br />
<br />
Anyway, it's a little thornier than we'd all like it to be for sure.  It will, eventually get sorted out.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Independant film financing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20110420/03063113973/kevin-smiths-red-state-movie-nearing-profitability-even-prior-to-regular-theatrical-release.shtml#c209</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:17:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20110420/03063113973/kevin-smiths-red-state-movie-nearing-profitability-even-prior-to-regular-theatrical-release.shtml#c209</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[To add to this, I've done two indie films this way, with investors in LLC's.  Adam's structure is about standard, though I'll add a bit more detail.<br />
<br />
In indie-land, we'll usually pay back gross receipts minus some minor approved costs like very, very minimal overhead, accounting fees, and union residuals to investors first until they are made whole plus a set return (recoupment for the investors on my last film outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by about 16% over 5 years from 2004-2010, which ain't sayin' much, but hey, at least it didn't *lose* money).<br />
<br />
After making the investors whole "plus," the profit split shifted to a 50/50 with producers and investors (which, was as it turned out, just about um, zero... the film did no more business).  But the deal itself was fair, and scalable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lies!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110414/03054913891/yet-another-study-shows-that-students-inherently-know-that-file-sharing-is-not-theft.shtml#c741</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:59:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110414/03054913891/yet-another-study-shows-that-students-inherently-know-that-file-sharing-is-not-theft.shtml#c741</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>A sentient puddle lay in a shallow depression...</blockquote><br />
<br />
Wow, this is deep.  Heh.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Robots</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110405/17395413792/newspaper-tells-reporters-not-to-engage-with-community.shtml#c49</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:52:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110405/17395413792/newspaper-tells-reporters-not-to-engage-with-community.shtml#c49</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe it'll be good when we have robots reporting facts in stories instead of people reporting "balanced" arguments?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110324/17421513618/hollywood-continues-its-plan-to-kill-netflix.shtml#c970</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:49:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110324/17421513618/hollywood-continues-its-plan-to-kill-netflix.shtml#c970</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[YES, WE ARE!<br />
<br />
Our relationships in general with the Networks and Studios have been painful and acrimonious; there are very few exceptions to this.  <br />
<br />
Many of us would far rather pitch nerds than MBA's.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Consequences?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110324/17421513618/hollywood-continues-its-plan-to-kill-netflix.shtml#c954</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:46:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110324/17421513618/hollywood-continues-its-plan-to-kill-netflix.shtml#c954</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Comment on the back catalog.<br />
<br />
The Studios CANNOT RELEASE much of their back catalog due to the fact they don't even know if their old rights deals allow them to release a lot of it digitally.  <br />
<br />
In particular, they are not sure that the music deals on old tv and films are cleared for digital releases, AND they are not willing to spend the legal $$$ (a lot) to find out.  In many cases, the physical paper rights records simply don't exist anymore.  And if they can't prove they have the rights, they can't get E&amp;O insurance coverage, and if they can't get E&amp;O on the digital releases, they simply won't release it.  It's too big a liability for them.<br />
<br />
I don't think you're going to see a lot of older back-catalog content until it falls into public domain, a very long time from now.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110324/17421513618/hollywood-continues-its-plan-to-kill-netflix.shtml#c946</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:42:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110324/17421513618/hollywood-continues-its-plan-to-kill-netflix.shtml#c946</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You mean this deal: <a href='http://www.deadline.com/2011/03/netflix-to-enter-original-programming-with-mega-deal-for-david-fincher-kevin-spacey-drama-series-house-of-cards/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.deadline.com/2011/03/netflix-to-enter-original-programming-with-mega-deal-for-david-fincher-kevin-spacey-drama-series-house-of-cards/</a><br />
<br />
Yep.  And I have friends who are queuing up to pitch original content series to Netflix like there's no tomorrow.  <br />
<br />
If producers can get better production financing deals, and less pain from a Netflix deal they'll go there in a hurry.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Obvious anti-patent bias, again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110316/23442113522/contract-dispute-reveals-that-intellectual-ventures-paid-consultant-to-get-unions-to-fight-patent-reform.shtml#c257</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Lawrence]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:55:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110316/23442113522/contract-dispute-reveals-that-intellectual-ventures-paid-consultant-to-get-unions-to-fight-patent-reform.shtml#c257</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You mean the workers who, on average, earn less now than they did in 1979? The bottom 80% of working people who's percentage of net wealth has fallen steadily since the 80's?  (http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html)<br />
<br />
While CEO pay has risen over 298% just since 2005?  Hm, I wonder what costs are making us uncompetitive?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>