http://www.techdirt.com/ Easily digestible tech news.... http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1845377172.shtml#c477 Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:25:35 PST http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1845377172.shtml#c477 http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1845377172.shtml#c79 Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:08:34 PST http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1845377172.shtml#c79
I hate when people spam their own websites in comments though, so unless anyone specifically wants to see it, I'm not going to write the name or url.

In any case, total legend. I agree 100%.]]> http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1518117169.shtml#c160 Thu, 3 Dec 2009 05:59:35 PST http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1518117169.shtml#c160
My point was just that we should be careful when discussing the 'three strikes clause' as it technically doesn't exist.

I don't want to give Labour the ability to dismiss our arguments based on 'there is no 3 strikes clause'.]]> http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1518117169.shtml#c121 Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:28:31 PST http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20091202/1518117169.shtml#c121
I thought there was only a power for Mandy to implement 'technical measures' at a later date if necessary.]]>