<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by Fushta</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c244</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 11:53:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c244</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>I don't know about Kitchen Nightmares, but Hell's Kitchen IS a bunch of out of work actors and family/friends of people on the staff. There is no actual Hell's Kitchen restaurant, it's just part of a TV recording studio.<br />
<br />
That's why some of them seem like they're there just to make a big enough fuss to get themselves on TV, because they are.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
I've always thought this was true. It's like they raid the out-of-work (or over-aged) modeling agencies in LA.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mythbusters: BUSTED</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c603</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 12:53:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c603</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I trust these guys more than the FAA:<br />
<a href='http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/mythbusters-database/cell-phones-interfere-plane-instruments.htm' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/mythbusters/mythbusters-database/cell-phones-interfere-plane-instruments.htm</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lawsuit against FourSquare in...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130102/01504521536/guy-claims-pinterest-is-ripoff-his-failed-unrelated-site.shtml#c46</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jan 2013 12:44:06 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130102/01504521536/guy-claims-pinterest-is-ripoff-his-failed-unrelated-site.shtml#c46</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[3...2...1]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121212/22445321369/funny-how-copyright-holders-only-ramped-up-google-dmca-takedowns-after-sopa-failed.shtml#c75</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:57:07 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121212/22445321369/funny-how-copyright-holders-only-ramped-up-google-dmca-takedowns-after-sopa-failed.shtml#c75</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[While clearly there is a direct relationship between the failure of SOPA to pass and the increase in DMCA takedown requests, there could be another reason.<br /><br />
Perhaps, the rights holders are trying to overwhelm Google by the tenfold increase in takedowns. Kind of a "we'll show them" mentality.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Camera Company Execs, too</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121212/14335021367/italian-prosecutor-still-wants-to-put-google-execs-jail-because-video-uploaded-some-kids.shtml#c68</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:28:20 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121212/14335021367/italian-prosecutor-still-wants-to-put-google-execs-jail-because-video-uploaded-some-kids.shtml#c68</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If the camera company didn't make the camera, then this film would've never been created, and therefore, Google would not be involved. Put the camera company execs in jail instead. Makes about as much sense.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111220/18294817149/guy-who-uploaded-early-version-wolverine-which-appears-not-to-have-hurt-movie-all-gets-1-year-jail.shtml#c1262</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:07:28 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111220/18294817149/guy-who-uploaded-early-version-wolverine-which-appears-not-to-have-hurt-movie-all-gets-1-year-jail.shtml#c1262</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[post hoc ergo propter hoc<br />
<br />
<a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111220/18294817149/guy-who-uploaded-early-version-wolverine-which-appears-not-to-have-hurt-movie-all-gets-1-year-jail.shtml#c1242</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:03:46 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111220/18294817149/guy-who-uploaded-early-version-wolverine-which-appears-not-to-have-hurt-movie-all-gets-1-year-jail.shtml#c1242</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So, let see if I have this. When he took the file from the other computer he erased the original file. Is that correct? I guess that would be stealing, since the studio wouldn't have the original anymore.<br />
<br />
Or maybe, he copies the file, and left the original still on that computer. How is that stealing again? Definition fail on your part.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Our Partial Apologies</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111112/01473916749/finns-norwegians-argue-over-who-owns-northern-lights.shtml#c729</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 06:51:22 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111112/01473916749/finns-norwegians-argue-over-who-owns-northern-lights.shtml#c729</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am only 1/6 Finnish, so on behalf of 16.666666666666666666666666666667% of the Finnish population, I apologize.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>20 Years?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/19234516715/facebook-agrees-to-submit-to-independent-privacy-audits-next-20-years.shtml#c9</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:00:21 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/19234516715/facebook-agrees-to-submit-to-independent-privacy-audits-next-20-years.shtml#c9</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[FB will be around of the next 20 years? Pffft.<br />
<br />
Honestly, though, I don't have a FB account for this very reason (their only reason for being in existence is to trade private data as a commodity).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/13455416712/house-judiciary-committee-refuses-to-hear-wider-tech-industry-concerns-about-sopa.shtml#c1523</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:17:19 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/13455416712/house-judiciary-committee-refuses-to-hear-wider-tech-industry-concerns-about-sopa.shtml#c1523</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's odd that "Anonymous Coward, Nov 10th, 2011 @ 6:54pm" attributes all lost sales to piracy. Take me, for example. Lost sales from me are a result of me not buying movies and music anymore (and I don't infringe/download, either). I spend my money elsewhere, so the tax revenue is unaffected. I would bet there are many more like me that have decided not to support the MPAA and RIAA by buying what they offer.<br />
<br />
One exception to my music purchases: I bought some songs from Trent Reznor directly from his website. Also, Radiohead. See, I guess I do buy music from those that provide a reason to buy. I bet my purchasing directly from the artist are part of your "lost sales" calculation. They aren't lost sales; they are just not being filtered by the RIAA.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: SOPA isn't for parasites of &quot;the wider internet industry&quot;!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/13455416712/house-judiciary-committee-refuses-to-hear-wider-tech-industry-concerns-about-sopa.shtml#c1459</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:00:16 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111110/13455416712/house-judiciary-committee-refuses-to-hear-wider-tech-industry-concerns-about-sopa.shtml#c1459</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Note to self: stop voting for yes men.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111107/01412516653/color-purple-trademarked.shtml#c159</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:50:34 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111107/01412516653/color-purple-trademarked.shtml#c159</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Crayola is boned, along with the Grape Ape and the original Hulk.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111109/09204316694/old-fashioned-pirates-steal-6000-copies-new-call-duty-game.shtml#c147</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 06:17:41 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111109/09204316694/old-fashioned-pirates-steal-6000-copies-new-call-duty-game.shtml#c147</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[*err, fell*]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111109/09204316694/old-fashioned-pirates-steal-6000-copies-new-call-duty-game.shtml#c135</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 06:17:05 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111109/09204316694/old-fashioned-pirates-steal-6000-copies-new-call-duty-game.shtml#c135</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think we are mostly adults here, who recognize sarcasm when we see it. Nobody is glorifying anything. If Mike's joking nature feel on deaf ears for you this time, rest assured, he'll keep trying in future "tongue-in-cheek" posts.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111103/18003116626/mainstream-press-realizing-that-e-parasitesopa-is-ridiculously-broad.shtml#c1997</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 12:01:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111103/18003116626/mainstream-press-realizing-that-e-parasitesopa-is-ridiculously-broad.shtml#c1997</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Also, say goodbye to Facebook. I cannot count how many infringing photos I've seen on peoples' photo galleries. Facebook better get going now, so by the time this bill is in effect, they won't be hosting infringing photos anymore.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: DNS Blocking Analogy</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111103/18003116626/mainstream-press-realizing-that-e-parasitesopa-is-ridiculously-broad.shtml#c1881</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 11:08:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111103/18003116626/mainstream-press-realizing-that-e-parasitesopa-is-ridiculously-broad.shtml#c1881</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Asking Flea Market operators to police their occupants' stalls is like asking the NFL officials to diagnose concussions during the game. How is the Flea Market operator supposed to know what is real/fake?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>DNS Blocking Analogy</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111103/18003116626/mainstream-press-realizing-that-e-parasitesopa-is-ridiculously-broad.shtml#c14</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Nov 2011 06:23:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111103/18003116626/mainstream-press-realizing-that-e-parasitesopa-is-ridiculously-broad.shtml#c14</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Since some pro-SOPA/E-PARASITE people like to relate the digital realm to the real world, I have an analogy to offer.<br />
<br />
Blocking a DNS for a domain that has multiple non-infringing sub-domains just because one site is infringing is like closing down an entire mall because one store is selling counterfeit socks. In what world, be it digital or real, does that make sense?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110927/10013316111/bethesda-turns-down-quake-fight-over-scrolls-name-takes-guaranteed-loss-going-to-court.shtml#c1000</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:58:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110927/10013316111/bethesda-turns-down-quake-fight-over-scrolls-name-takes-guaranteed-loss-going-to-court.shtml#c1000</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[/troll_mode]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110927/10013316111/bethesda-turns-down-quake-fight-over-scrolls-name-takes-guaranteed-loss-going-to-court.shtml#c994</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:57:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110927/10013316111/bethesda-turns-down-quake-fight-over-scrolls-name-takes-guaranteed-loss-going-to-court.shtml#c994</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[*jumps off building*<br /><br />
Thank the maker]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110927/09480916110/can-nypd-back-up-its-claim-confrontation-that-required-pepper-spray-despite-more-video-evidence.shtml#c373</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fushta]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 12:53:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110927/09480916110/can-nypd-back-up-its-claim-confrontation-that-required-pepper-spray-despite-more-video-evidence.shtml#c373</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I believe the barrier is not to keep them in, but instead to designate the "protest area." Did I mention that I think protests are worthless? They try to draw attention to their cause, but most people are apathetic, and won't remember next week.<br /><br />
As for the pepper spraying, maybe the cops were afraid of the trim-haired Wiccan in the prairie skirt. Maybe she was about to cast a spell on their asses, so they had to act. That's the aggression they were anticipating.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>