<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by E. Zachary Knight</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: So what amendment will be next to go Peter King?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/01495623420/rep-peter-king-says-reporters-should-be-prosecuted-reporting-government-leaks.shtml#c586</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:06:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/01495623420/rep-peter-king-says-reporters-should-be-prosecuted-reporting-government-leaks.shtml#c586</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I like to argue that income taxes are a violation of our 3rd Amendment rights. The 3rd Amendment guarantees the government will not force us to house soldiers in peace time. Taxes we are forced to pay go toward housing soldiers during peace times.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Libertarianism isn't sounding so bad now, huh?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/17083023397/unfortunate-that-russ-feingold-got-swept-out-office-2010-as-his-predictions-have-come-true.shtml#c415</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:02:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/17083023397/unfortunate-that-russ-feingold-got-swept-out-office-2010-as-his-predictions-have-come-true.shtml#c415</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So you would rather have the government placing 24/7 surveillance on you and your home rather than have the government leave you alone as long as you aren't hurting someone else?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Demand Impeachment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130605/20062423332/leaked-document-shows-nsa-is-harvesting-call-data-millions-verizon-subscribers.shtml#c486</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Jun 2013 06:26:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130605/20062423332/leaked-document-shows-nsa-is-harvesting-call-data-millions-verizon-subscribers.shtml#c486</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How about we start with the entire NSA. The whole setup is a violation of the constitutional rights of US citizens.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130531/01293823260/utah-sheriff-claims-copyright-mugshot-photos-to-avoid-releasing-them.shtml#c728</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Jun 2013 11:44:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130531/01293823260/utah-sheriff-claims-copyright-mugshot-photos-to-avoid-releasing-them.shtml#c728</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Perhaps you are not aware of what a scarlet letter is. There was a book about it once. It involved a woman who was caught in an adulterous relationship and was forced to wear a red A on her at all times so that everyone knew she committed adultery. This resulted in her to be ostracized from society.<br />
<br />
Putting someone on a lifetime sex offender registry or labeling them a felon does much the same thing. Felons have trouble getting jobs. Sex offenders have trouble finding housing. Both labeling systems result in undue hardships and ostracizing of the person labeled. <br />
<br />
If ind it hard to understand how a "compassionate society" would endorse either scenario. I find it hard to understand how someone could advocate against a site that publishes mugshots, claiming that it is a form of scarlet lettering, while supporting a "justice" system that does far more damage.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130531/01293823260/utah-sheriff-claims-copyright-mugshot-photos-to-avoid-releasing-them.shtml#c380</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 5 Jun 2013 08:44:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130531/01293823260/utah-sheriff-claims-copyright-mugshot-photos-to-avoid-releasing-them.shtml#c380</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>"A compassionate society does not utilize the scarlet letter," he said"</em><br />
<br />
So is this guy an advocate for ending sex offender registries and felony labeling? If not, he is a hypocrite and needs to rethink his position.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c44</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:12:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c44</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think he may be referring to the constant wave effect happening. The image appears to wave at parts. Some more intensely than others.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10391523084/vp-joe-biden-believes-theres-no-legal-reason-government-cant-slap-sin-tax-violent-media.shtml#c493</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 06:36:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10391523084/vp-joe-biden-believes-theres-no-legal-reason-government-cant-slap-sin-tax-violent-media.shtml#c493</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I do believe that the MPAA filed a brief or two in the Brown vs EMA suit in support of the games industry. If not, they at least showed support of the final Supreme Court ruling.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Bit Upset With Netflix Here</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/16411122954/fight-over-drm-html5-should-represent-last-stand-drm.shtml#c4</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 May 2013 05:57:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/16411122954/fight-over-drm-html5-should-represent-last-stand-drm.shtml#c4</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have had a love/hate relationship with Netflix for many years now. I love the service they provide and the content I can watch. The price is pretty good for what they offer. I have subscribed for many years.<br />
<br />
However, their stance on DRM is the primary focus of the hate part of the relationship. Their insistence on using DRM, driven mostly by their media partners, has prevented me from being able to watch online any content on my primary PC and my HTPC. The reason is that the DRM they use, Microsoft Silverlight, is not compatible with my operating system, Linux. It never has been and never will. <br />
<br />
Lucky for me, some clever users were willing to violate the DMCA and risk fines and jailtime to circumvent the DRM and allow Netflix's Watch Instantly software to run in Linux based PCs. It is absolutely insane that one must risk financial and social ruin to allow people to use services they are already paying for.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130418/19421722759/former-policy-secretary-dhs-uses-boston-bombing-to-point-out-how-eff-aclu-are-wrong-about-surveillance-cispa.shtml#c189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 07:28:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130418/19421722759/former-policy-secretary-dhs-uses-boston-bombing-to-point-out-how-eff-aclu-are-wrong-about-surveillance-cispa.shtml#c189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That is a very good point. The FBI spent all that time creating its own terror plots that it failed to find any real plots. This needs to be shouted from the roof tops.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130418/10170622751/cispa-passes-house-as-288-representatives-dont-want-to-protect-your-privacy.shtml#c369</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:38:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130418/10170622751/cispa-passes-house-as-288-representatives-dont-want-to-protect-your-privacy.shtml#c369</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Really? My Representative has a long and deep history of voting for crap like this yet I still can't get him voted out of office.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130415/14130522712/boston-officials-allegedly-shut-down-mobile-service-boston-to-prevent-remote-detonation.shtml#c143</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:34:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130415/14130522712/boston-officials-allegedly-shut-down-mobile-service-boston-to-prevent-remote-detonation.shtml#c143</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In response to the Boston bombings, police have shut down one of the most useful and commonly used services for victims and those close by to contact family and emergency services. They have shut down the ability for media to communicate easily with one another. Shutting down the cell services of the Boston area will do nothing but spur more panic and frustration at the scene and around those trying to contact loved ones. Imagine being a parent or spouse trying to contact someone you suspect as having been there and getting nothing but a "Your call cannot be connected" message.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Copyright on clothes</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12122122666/fox-sends-cease-desist-letters-to-firefly-fans-selling-jayne-hats-because-money.shtml#c815</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:02:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12122122666/fox-sends-cease-desist-letters-to-firefly-fans-selling-jayne-hats-because-money.shtml#c815</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am aware that they are not unique to the real world. My daughters have owned several pairs of "ruby slippers" but they were never called "Ruby Slippers" in any marketing materials. However, you cannot make a Wizard of Oz movie that includes Ruby slippers because those were a construct of MGM.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Copyright on clothes</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12122122666/fox-sends-cease-desist-letters-to-firefly-fans-selling-jayne-hats-because-money.shtml#c441</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:07:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12122122666/fox-sends-cease-desist-letters-to-firefly-fans-selling-jayne-hats-because-money.shtml#c441</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[While there is no fashion design copyrights, there is movie, and TV copyrights. Those copyrights extend their protection to anything uniquely identifiable to the movie. That is why no one by MGM can make Ruby Slippers or use the exact look for the Scarecrow and Tinman, as an example. That is why Fox thinks it is the only one who can license the rights to sell Jayne hats.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: THIS is what your Ivy League education comes to, Mike?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12122122666/fox-sends-cease-desist-letters-to-firefly-fans-selling-jayne-hats-because-money.shtml#c404</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:05:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12122122666/fox-sends-cease-desist-letters-to-firefly-fans-selling-jayne-hats-because-money.shtml#c404</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I honestly don't get your doublethink. Do you even recognize it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12122122666/fox-sends-cease-desist-letters-to-firefly-fans-selling-jayne-hats-because-money.shtml#c359</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:03:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12122122666/fox-sends-cease-desist-letters-to-firefly-fans-selling-jayne-hats-because-money.shtml#c359</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Calling them "Jayne hats" and making them look exactly like the hat Jayne wore in the series could be copyright infringement. Kind of silly, but that is the world we live in.<br />
<br />
Now, the question then becomes, can you legally recreate and sell the hat without using the term "Jayne"? If people are selling replica's but not referring directly to the show, would Fox be in its right to send a C&amp;D? I wouldn't think so. While the hat had a unique look in the show (did you see any other knitted caps?), it isn't unique in the real world.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Did the university register the copyright on their survey?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130403/16412622564/copyright-as-censorship-university-threatens-own-faculty-with-copyright-infringement-campus-survey.shtml#c407</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:50:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130403/16412622564/copyright-as-censorship-university-threatens-own-faculty-with-copyright-infringement-campus-survey.shtml#c407</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They can still sue over real damages, just not statutory. But since they probably weren't selling the survey or otherwise making money off it, they wouldn't be able to win any kind of award.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130403/16412622564/copyright-as-censorship-university-threatens-own-faculty-with-copyright-infringement-campus-survey.shtml#c367</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:48:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130403/16412622564/copyright-as-censorship-university-threatens-own-faculty-with-copyright-infringement-campus-survey.shtml#c367</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Let me ask you this:<br />
<br />
I set up an HTPC to record shows that come on during hours in which I am away from the TV so that I can watch them at my leisure. <br />
<br />
Just last week, the CPU fried and my HTPC is dead.<br />
<br />
Is it infringement for me to the go to the pirate bay and download the very episodes I recorded, legally, so that I can still watch them?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130403/16412622564/copyright-as-censorship-university-threatens-own-faculty-with-copyright-infringement-campus-survey.shtml#c260</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:44:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130403/16412622564/copyright-as-censorship-university-threatens-own-faculty-with-copyright-infringement-campus-survey.shtml#c260</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I guess you missed the recent story about the author who made a million dollars over night by selling print and movie rights to his books.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130328/16411922505/successful-self-published-ebook-authors-sells-print-movie-rights-1-million-keeps-digital-rights-to-himself.shtml#c101</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 3 Apr 2013 06:36:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130328/16411922505/successful-self-published-ebook-authors-sells-print-movie-rights-1-million-keeps-digital-rights-to-himself.shtml#c101</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For digital the benefit to the author of going with a publisher is nearly non existant. <br />
<br />
As a self published author, you get 70% of whatever you price your book at. As a traditionally published author with a digital release, I think it is around 12-25% of the profit. That is after the 30% the distribution service (Amazon) takes and whatever other expenses the publisher claims. Often this ends up as less than 10% the list price.<br />
<br />
So what do you want, 70% of a $3 book or 10% of a $10 book?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130322/23560222425/copyright-lobby-public-has-no-place-policy-discussions.shtml#c1425</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[E. Zachary Knight]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:47:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130322/23560222425/copyright-lobby-public-has-no-place-policy-discussions.shtml#c1425</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>Mike clearly wants authors to have no exclusive rights whatsoever.</em><br />
<br />
Interesting, he has never said as much publicly or in private.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>