<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by duffmeister</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130321/13345322408/court-finds-meltwaters-news-clipping-service-infringes-ap-copyrights.shtml#c441</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 08:21:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130321/13345322408/court-finds-meltwaters-news-clipping-service-infringes-ap-copyrights.shtml#c441</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Rosebud was a sled.<br />
<br />
Yup, I just ruined a whole movie there..... does that make it important? Are all spoilers now infringement? Interesting thoughts on the implications of this idea if upheld.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130117/02530421711/copyright-is-becoming-guilt-accusation.shtml#c817</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:01:26 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130117/02530421711/copyright-is-becoming-guilt-accusation.shtml#c817</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[sure it does........<br />
<br />
I'm stealing your copyright rights and claiming them as my own, the MPAA and RIAA do this all the time. (Look at all the times they claim to own the rights and actually don't, or over represent their rights.)This is the only way copyright theft can happen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes but...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121018/13484820754/google-to-french-media-we-may-have-to-cut-you-off.shtml#c1282</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:03:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121018/13484820754/google-to-french-media-we-may-have-to-cut-you-off.shtml#c1282</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[so google has sued Macro$uck for Bing?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120815/02032320059/now-nbc-execs-are-just-trolling-claim-they-regret-not-tape-delaying-more-olympics.shtml#c543</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 13:41:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120815/02032320059/now-nbc-execs-are-just-trolling-claim-they-regret-not-tape-delaying-more-olympics.shtml#c543</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["If you actually worked in the field, even for a day, you might understand."<br />
<br />
This is the internet, If you actually worked in the field, even for a day, you might understand.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Plausible deniability?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120724/04221719809/court-says-state-department-can-live-fantasyland-pretend-documents-leaked-wikileaks-are-still-secret.shtml#c421</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:42:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120724/04221719809/court-says-state-department-can-live-fantasyland-pretend-documents-leaked-wikileaks-are-still-secret.shtml#c421</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If they are forgeries how can they prosecute the person who leaked them?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Funnyjunk isn't entirely wrong</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120611/20343419281/oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-how-court-public-opinion-beats-court-baseless-legal-threats.shtml#c97</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:53:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120611/20343419281/oatmeal-v-funnyjunk-how-court-public-opinion-beats-court-baseless-legal-threats.shtml#c97</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If saying something like that in an obviously humorous fashion is defamation, then I am in trouble.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Perfect!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120118/00463817446/anti-sopapipa-protest-songs.shtml#c584</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:00:42 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120118/00463817446/anti-sopapipa-protest-songs.shtml#c584</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://theoatmeal.com/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://theoatmeal.com/</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111227/04112817201/company-caught-downloading-competitors-software-just-has-to-pay-fee-to-buy-one-license.shtml#c559</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:57:26 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111227/04112817201/company-caught-downloading-competitors-software-just-has-to-pay-fee-to-buy-one-license.shtml#c559</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[[citation needed]]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The world is one</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111227/02500817197/why-does-recording-industry-complain-when-its-often-its-own-worst-enemy.shtml#c458</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 08:15:19 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111227/02500817197/why-does-recording-industry-complain-when-its-often-its-own-worst-enemy.shtml#c458</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[forgot to log in again, Well what can you do?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Not your invented &quot;domain censorship&quot;, but actual piracy.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111208/01424117003/court-dismisses-puerto-80-rojadirecta-case-now-doesnt-give-back-domain.shtml#c180</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:47:48 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111208/01424117003/court-dismisses-puerto-80-rojadirecta-case-now-doesnt-give-back-domain.shtml#c180</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was not arguing for or against their actual guilt. I believe they have done no wrong. I was trying to comment upon the refusal of so many against them of letting due process be followed. It seems simple that just allowing both sides the benefits of the process would allow an unshakable ruling to be made. The only reason to deny due process is that you have something to hide and wish to just get it over with. <br />
<br />
It is even due process to allow seizures before trial, but even those rules have been cast aside because the authorities have already decided the guilt of the accused and are seemingly just looking for a way to make their fiction a truth.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Not your invented &quot;domain censorship&quot;, but actual piracy.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111208/01424117003/court-dismisses-puerto-80-rojadirecta-case-now-doesnt-give-back-domain.shtml#c78</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:19:58 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111208/01424117003/court-dismisses-puerto-80-rojadirecta-case-now-doesnt-give-back-domain.shtml#c78</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I still have to wonder why due process is not being followed. Even if they are guilty, (not under the laws of the locality they operate under might I add) cases are normally thrown out if due process is violated as this invalidates court hearings. Lets look at an example in a criminal trial, if a perpetrator of a crime has his rights violated, is it not the case that they are most often released due to technicalities of failure to follow due process? I just want to see justice served and that means everyone follow the rules so that if they are convicted it was because they have been found to have violated the law and were treated within the confines of their rights. I would think anyone who wants to speak out against piracy and infringement would want the cases air tight and strictly following due process so that they can hold those cases up as clear cut examples of what happens when you break the law.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: SOPA needed because Grooveshark is GRIFTING:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111126/15435216901/hypocrites-congress-who-voted-against-net-neutrality-sopapipa.shtml#c535</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:41:49 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111126/15435216901/hypocrites-congress-who-voted-against-net-neutrality-sopapipa.shtml#c535</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So aren't there laws that already cover this? Aren't they being sued under those existing laws?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/22454416687/understanding-anonymous-culture-lulz.shtml#c610</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:24:57 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/22454416687/understanding-anonymous-culture-lulz.shtml#c610</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[FNORD! This comment left intentionally blank.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/22454416687/understanding-anonymous-culture-lulz.shtml#c603</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:20:42 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/22454416687/understanding-anonymous-culture-lulz.shtml#c603</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[All Hail Discordia!<br />
<br />
Rule of 5s]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/23201616688/viacom-exec-everyone-knows-rogue-site-when-they-see-one-except-he-doesnt.shtml#c2990</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:04:52 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/23201616688/viacom-exec-everyone-knows-rogue-site-when-they-see-one-except-he-doesnt.shtml#c2990</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[seems? that doesn't mean it is obvious then does it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well, let's give up on all laws then.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/23201616688/viacom-exec-everyone-knows-rogue-site-when-they-see-one-except-he-doesnt.shtml#c2970</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:03:45 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/23201616688/viacom-exec-everyone-knows-rogue-site-when-they-see-one-except-he-doesnt.shtml#c2970</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What about then entire concept established in law and court cases for prior restraint of speech?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Well, let's give up on all laws then.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/23201616688/viacom-exec-everyone-knows-rogue-site-when-they-see-one-except-he-doesnt.shtml#c2947</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:00:51 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111108/23201616688/viacom-exec-everyone-knows-rogue-site-when-they-see-one-except-he-doesnt.shtml#c2947</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Does not an amendment to a document take precedence over the initial wording? If not why change it? So in that case 1st amendment protections were put in place to curb the power of copyright.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Jobs = Hypocrite</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20111021/16380816459/steve-jobs-was-willing-to-rip-off-everyone-else-was-pissed-about-android-copying-iphone.shtml#c1746</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:17:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20111021/16380816459/steve-jobs-was-willing-to-rip-off-everyone-else-was-pissed-about-android-copying-iphone.shtml#c1746</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyrighting what someone else created is not legal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ugh please</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20111021/16380816459/steve-jobs-was-willing-to-rip-off-everyone-else-was-pissed-about-android-copying-iphone.shtml#c1165</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:08:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20111021/16380816459/steve-jobs-was-willing-to-rip-off-everyone-else-was-pissed-about-android-copying-iphone.shtml#c1165</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Obvious does not equal easy. Ask any programmer. <br />
<br />
There were many failed attempts to do what Jobs did, he just had ability to make it successful. If his design was above reproach why had it changed and/or been improved? I still feel there is so much more that can come out of the platform that in 10 years we will see what Jobs did as a great step forward but still a primitive attempt to make a great tablet/phone. The one thing you can be sure of with technology, it will progress and be based on the ideas that came before it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20111021/16380816459/steve-jobs-was-willing-to-rip-off-everyone-else-was-pissed-about-android-copying-iphone.shtml#c1109</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[duffmeister]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 09:02:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20111021/16380816459/steve-jobs-was-willing-to-rip-off-everyone-else-was-pissed-about-android-copying-iphone.shtml#c1109</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gestures existed in many different areas before of linux for example<br />
<br />
On screen keyboards existed before in key access machines for example<br />
<br />
Orientation changing existed before see the gateway tablet/laptop<br />
<br />
Android / iOS are completely different under the hood for the programming<br />
<br />
An app store existed before see steam for a game app store that existed before<br />
<br />
The basic shape and form of the tablet was predicted in the film 2001 (look for the scene where the guy is having a video chat while eating using a tablet)<br />
<br />
Many of the features of tablets were predicted by the Knight Ridder company in 1994 <br />
<br />
So much of what is being claimed here as innovation was really just seeing what was coming and being the first to incorporate all of the different things into a single device. Is it forward thinking, good business sense, and even raising the bar for the whole industry, yes. Is it innovative, new, or even novel, I don't think so. I hate to bring out a trite quote from Star Trek but "in every revolution there is one man with a vision." He may have been the visionary to combine it first, but it was only a matter of time until someone made the obvious combination of technologies. Does this make Jobs special, no, he was just first.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>