<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by CD</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130206/10392021893/north-korea-threatens-to-nuke-us-with-copied-video-game-footage.shtml#c105</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:34:32 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130206/10392021893/north-korea-threatens-to-nuke-us-with-copied-video-game-footage.shtml#c105</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wonder if they got HOMEFRONT!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Amazon is in trouble....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130103/16474721574/one-problem-with-ftcgoogle-settlement-implies-fair-use-scraping-is-antitrust-issue.shtml#c40</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 4 Jan 2013 16:26:16 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130103/16474721574/one-problem-with-ftcgoogle-settlement-implies-fair-use-scraping-is-antitrust-issue.shtml#c40</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I guess this means that Amazon is also performing anti-trust scraping when they show products offered by other sites or online stores on their pages.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/10575921075/taliban-spokesman-accidentally-copies-mailing-list-press-release-email.shtml#c104</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:27:45 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/10575921075/taliban-spokesman-accidentally-copies-mailing-list-press-release-email.shtml#c104</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This will go unnoticed. The Government, including the CIA, are too busy having wet daydreams about affairs than caring about terrorist attacks and platter served intel.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120731/11564719898/how-petty-patent-fights-can-get-samsung-upset-that-apple-gets-top-billing-patent-suit.shtml#c189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 1 Aug 2012 06:31:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120731/11564719898/how-petty-patent-fights-can-get-samsung-upset-that-apple-gets-top-billing-patent-suit.shtml#c189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mute point. Now had this been an electronic sign capable of being updated via the internet using a touchscreen that scrolled and snapped back when you get to the end of the page, then someone's going to pay!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: I don't get it...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120716/03353419707/patent-battle-over-speech-devices-real-irreparable-harm-is-child-losing-her-only-voice.shtml#c379</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 15:54:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120716/03353419707/patent-battle-over-speech-devices-real-irreparable-harm-is-child-losing-her-only-voice.shtml#c379</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Who had the other 10% of the iPad market?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120706/12332419607/uk-ministry-defence-close-to-gaining-patent-key-gps-technology-us-not-amused.shtml#c363</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Jul 2012 05:23:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120706/12332419607/uk-ministry-defence-close-to-gaining-patent-key-gps-technology-us-not-amused.shtml#c363</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In order to extradite, they would have to claim copyright infringement on the manuals or something. They could however, claim infringement on another patent and sue to have all GPS devices in the UK banned for sale.  Who says watching Apple and Samsung isn't a learning experience?!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Similar or no?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120214/11372917759/meltwater-partially-wins-one-lawsuit-gets-sued-ap-another-daring-to-aggregate-news.shtml#c32</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:04:44 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120214/11372917759/meltwater-partially-wins-one-lawsuit-gets-sued-ap-another-daring-to-aggregate-news.shtml#c32</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is this not similar to the Belgian Newspaper and Google delisting episode?<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110508/16543114199/belgian-appeals-court-says-google-must-pay-up-linking-to-newspaper-websites.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110508/16543114199/belgian-appeals-court-says-google-must-pay-up-linking-to-newspaper-websites.shtml</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120129/17474617581/nbc-news-doesnt-understand-fair-use-demands-mitt-romney-remove-ads-that-use-tv-news-clips.shtml#c217</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:19:08 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120129/17474617581/nbc-news-doesnt-understand-fair-use-demands-mitt-romney-remove-ads-that-use-tv-news-clips.shtml#c217</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Quick shutdown the campaign website, freeze all assets, and delete the data within a week or two.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120121/16551717500/jonathan-coulton-destroys-rationale-behind-megaupload-seizure-with-single-tweet-follows-up-with-epic-blog-post.shtml#c276</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:00:15 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120121/16551717500/jonathan-coulton-destroys-rationale-behind-megaupload-seizure-with-single-tweet-follows-up-with-epic-blog-post.shtml#c276</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe he should use the RIAA's math and sue them for lost wages. I mean, how could they debunk the numbers that they use to calculate damages for their payouts when they're used against them?!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: It's Simple</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120119/01493317470/what-is-ron-paul-thinking-sues-to-unmask-anonymous-internet-users.shtml#c715</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:27:44 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120119/01493317470/what-is-ron-paul-thinking-sues-to-unmask-anonymous-internet-users.shtml#c715</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your post hit when your ISP ran a test run of the SOPA/PIPA internet scrubber to check for infringing content. Since yours was free of infringement, they posted it two extra times for you to reward your good behavior.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: I think Bruce got our message</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120118/15235517460/best-congressional-response-to-sopa-yet-rep-bruce-braley-takes-to-censored-to-explain-his-censored.shtml#c142</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:19:15 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120118/15235517460/best-congressional-response-to-sopa-yet-rep-bruce-braley-takes-to-censored-to-explain-his-censored.shtml#c142</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why stop? Might as well keep the pressure on. That's what Lobbyists do. We may not have the cash floating around, but constantly making contact forces them into a whole 'squeaky wheel gets the grease' situation.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120116/11495217418/its-official-wikipedia-to-go-dark-wednesday.shtml#c307</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:09:11 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120116/11495217418/its-official-wikipedia-to-go-dark-wednesday.shtml#c307</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The search engines could respond by filtering all the RIAA and MPAA links in their databases. Reply to questions why it's gone...well there was this guy that said that he owned this line of code in the source of your HTML and it fell under his copyright. So, we had to remove all of your sites that had this comment in them...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: LLC</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120106/00154917294/righthaven-fails-to-show-up-court-as-ordered-when-confronted-says-it-got-confused-over-date.shtml#c659</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:38:00 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120106/00154917294/righthaven-fails-to-show-up-court-as-ordered-when-confronted-says-it-got-confused-over-date.shtml#c659</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I always thought it was Company, but your post made me second guess myself. So I googled "LLC". I don't know which is more credible... Wikipedia or a Government run agency, so I put both. They both say the same thing.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_liability_company' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_liability_company</a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=98277,00.html' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=98277,00.html</a><br />
<br />
I even googled Limited Liability Corporation and all the links were pointing to Limited Liability Company.<br />
<br />
However, your comment pointed me to the similarities between the two, so I'm sure it could be overlooked and then treated as a Corporation anyway.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: LLC</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120106/00154917294/righthaven-fails-to-show-up-court-as-ordered-when-confronted-says-it-got-confused-over-date.shtml#c428</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 07:05:36 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120106/00154917294/righthaven-fails-to-show-up-court-as-ordered-when-confronted-says-it-got-confused-over-date.shtml#c428</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well I did put in a URL but it's not showing underlined....<br />
<br />
pay fees ordered by court links to:<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110927/22251216119/righthaven-desperately-trying-to-avoid-paying-legal-fees.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110927/22251216119/righthaven-desperately-trying-to-avoid-paying-legal-fees.shtml</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>LLC</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120106/00154917294/righthaven-fails-to-show-up-court-as-ordered-when-confronted-says-it-got-confused-over-date.shtml#c406</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 6 Jan 2012 07:04:10 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120106/00154917294/righthaven-fails-to-show-up-court-as-ordered-when-confronted-says-it-got-confused-over-date.shtml#c406</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good thing Righthaven is an LLC and not a Corporation. Otherwise, since the Gov thinks corporations are people, the court could issue a WARRANT for Righthaven.<br />
<br />
Then all we have to do is wait for Righthaven to be caught speeding.  Or maybe they'd use Dog Chapman for bail bond since they cannot <a>pay fees ordered by court</a> and we see them running scared on A&amp;E.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111220/03135817138/myth-that-sopapipa-only-impact-foreign-sites.shtml#c866</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:08:49 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111220/03135817138/myth-that-sopapipa-only-impact-foreign-sites.shtml#c866</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Now with this statement...."<i>No "file hosting", no "video hosting", no "lockers", but an actual host where you decide 100% what is seen when people access your files - and you pay for the hosting.</i>"<br />
<br />
Exactly how will you be able to create either of your examples. Without hosting "FILES" you cannot have a website displayed. What if I want to allow "VIDEO HOSTING" or "STORAGE SPACE"? I get to "<i>...decide 100% what is seen when people access [MY] files - and [I] pay for the hosting.</i>"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: The Scariest Part</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20111209/08380617021/microsoft-reminds-everyone-you-do-not-own-your-software.shtml#c233</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:22:55 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20111209/08380617021/microsoft-reminds-everyone-you-do-not-own-your-software.shtml#c233</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Profanity contained in the image....<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.stevenhumour.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/save-button.jpg' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.stevenhumour.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/save-button.jpg</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Copyright and Patent Everything</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111129/06033116920/eu-advocate-general-functionalities-computer-program-cannot-be-protected-copyright.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:57:29 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111129/06033116920/eu-advocate-general-functionalities-computer-program-cannot-be-protected-copyright.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In addition, a Litigation Tax equal to some percentage of the agreed settlement or award in a case regardless of outcome and paid by the owner. This tax would then have to exempted from costs that can be sued for. Sure you can get attorney fees, but paying for your tax, that's on you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111123/00111116880/another-dns-provider-comes-out-against-sopa.shtml#c391</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:01:42 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111123/00111116880/another-dns-provider-comes-out-against-sopa.shtml#c391</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Only because their phishing emails will not be able to be hidden as easily since they'll have to use IPs instead of one-off domain names in the URLs.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111020/11465616440/tsa-decides-terrorists-must-be-driving-partners-with-tenn-law-enforcement-to-randomly-search-vehicles.shtml#c966</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 11:03:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111020/11465616440/tsa-decides-terrorists-must-be-driving-partners-with-tenn-law-enforcement-to-randomly-search-vehicles.shtml#c966</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Be careful how you word that.... Sounds to me like you just gave consent.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>