<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by David Sanger</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>And what about the Church?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121022/10072320787/italian-scientists-convicted-manslaughter-sentenced-to-6-years-jail-over-earthquake-they-failed-to-predict-properly.shtml#c1378</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 09:28:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121022/10072320787/italian-scientists-convicted-manslaughter-sentenced-to-6-years-jail-over-earthquake-they-failed-to-predict-properly.shtml#c1378</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm surprised they didn't charge the local Catholic Church for not being sufficiently prayerful, or for uttering ineffective prayers.<br />
<br />
Maybe they are next.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Violating a Twitter name</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120615/17334719354/funnyjunks-lawyer-charles-carreon-just-keeps-digging-promises-hell-find-some-law-to-go-after-oatmeals-matt-inman.shtml#c1642</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:11:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120615/17334719354/funnyjunks-lawyer-charles-carreon-just-keeps-digging-promises-hell-find-some-law-to-go-after-oatmeals-matt-inman.shtml#c1642</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Clearly the most egregious and illegal activity was violating his twitter name!!<br />
<br />
Eh, what??]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>was it used</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/18163418570/chilling-effects-copyfraud-blocking-researcher-fair-use-scaring-him-into-staying-quiet-about-it.shtml#c1044</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:26:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120419/18163418570/chilling-effects-copyfraud-blocking-researcher-fair-use-scaring-him-into-staying-quiet-about-it.shtml#c1044</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mike, it is unclear from the article whether the researcher actually ended up publishing the image.<br />
<br />
If not, why the reticence in discussing details?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120313/04501718088/collection-society-to-libraries-no-story-time-kids-unless-you-pay-to-read-aloud.shtml#c819</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:05:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120313/04501718088/collection-society-to-libraries-no-story-time-kids-unless-you-pay-to-read-aloud.shtml#c819</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's probably a market opportunity then for non-SABAM books free from any such restrictions.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>It's a joke</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120309/18103118061/guess-what-copying-still-isnt-stealing.shtml#c4772</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:48:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120309/18103118061/guess-what-copying-still-isnt-stealing.shtml#c4772</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Instead of music consider another medium. Let's say you think of a hilarious joke (like the one about the three nuns in a taxi]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20111229/17291917231/verizon-wireless-paying-online-is-more-convenient-so-now-you-have-to-pay-2-to-do-so.shtml#c19</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:24:54 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20111229/17291917231/verizon-wireless-paying-online-is-more-convenient-so-now-you-have-to-pay-2-to-do-so.shtml#c19</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[well I'll just charge them $3 for the privilege of receiving my payment]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Competition from backlist</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111229/16024817230/us-box-office-revenue-finally-drops-not-because-infringement.shtml#c463</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:39:46 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111229/16024817230/us-box-office-revenue-finally-drops-not-because-infringement.shtml#c463</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ebert mentions "Competition from other forms of delivery" and you add "Competition from other forms of entertaintment."<br />
<br />
More significant I think is competition from all the other movies made in the past. <br />
<br />
You can't see them in theaters, but only via home rentals of some sort. With today's technology we are no longer restricted to seeing just the few films most recently released and being marketed, but can, at our leisure and on our own time, see any of tens of thousands of films.<br />
<br />
I'd gladly have seen 3:10 to Yuma, Unforgiven, Gone With the Wind in theaters last year but they weren't showing anywhere so I watched them on Netflix.<br />
<br />
There aren't enough cinemas to show even a fraction of films people want to watch and this is an inevitable consequence of today's technology.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trademark</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111226/22012517190/righthavencom-domain-auction-has-begun.shtml#c192</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:04:40 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111226/22012517190/righthavencom-domain-auction-has-begun.shtml#c192</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What about the fact that they registered a trademark in the word Righthaven?<br />
<br />
"IC 042. US 100 101. G &amp; S: Searching and retrieving information, sites, and other resources available on computer networks for others. FIRST USE: 20100301. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 20100301"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Movies and Music</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111116/13243616795/thoughts-house-judiciary-committees-hearings-sopa.shtml#c997</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:11:33 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20111116/13243616795/thoughts-house-judiciary-committees-hearings-sopa.shtml#c997</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Although SOPA refers to copyrighted material the motivation behind it is exclusively focused on Hollywood films and big label music.<br />
<br />
Does anyone think for a minute that the Attorney General, or the ISPs or anyone else will be interested in, or capable of, identifying infringements of photographs, poems, fonts, children's drawings, quotations, logos and distinguishing them from licensed usages or fair use? Not a chance.<br />
<br />
This in effect provides for elevated copyright protection for a very small subset of content, films and music, supported and paid for by MPAA and RIAA.<br />
<br />
Not a good idea at all.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>It's a question of price</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110328/22060313665/emperors-new-paywall.shtml#c372</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 20:51:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110328/22060313665/emperors-new-paywall.shtml#c372</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I read the NY Times quite often and enjoy it as one of my news sources along with BBC Reuters the Washington Post and (recently) Al Jazeera, and sohave no problem paying a small amount for doing so with ease. <br />
<br />
$35 a month is way way too high in my opinion. When I found out you could get full digital subscription by subscribing the Weekend Book Review for $1.75 a week I signed up. That's about $7.50 a month, which is more reasonable (the right price, I'd say, would be $4.99 a month)<br />
<br />
They since seem to have disabled the link, but you might still be able to get a subscription.<br />
<br />
As for hacks, the easiest way of all I found was to go to nytimes.com and then instead of clicking on links, do a right-click-copy-link-open-new-window-paste. No ?args. No paywall.<br />
<br />
Even so that's a pain and I chose the $7.50 a month instead.<br />
<br />
I donate $1 + a month to you, Mike, and they write many more stories than you do.<br />
<br />
Making it a highly porous barrier may turn out to be a fair compromise. Traffic will tell.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110308/02354213395/massive-research-report-piracy-emerging-economies-released-debunks-entire-foundation-us-foreign-ip-policy.shtml#c325</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:46:40 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110308/02354213395/massive-research-report-piracy-emerging-economies-released-debunks-entire-foundation-us-foreign-ip-policy.shtml#c325</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Social Science Research Council]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>ten ones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110307/11561113386/ny-times-lawyers-shut-down-blog-promoting-ny-times.shtml#c124</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 7 Mar 2011 13:01:54 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110307/11561113386/ny-times-lawyers-shut-down-blog-promoting-ny-times.shtml#c124</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[nice work he has there. funny that very few of the images are actually NY Times images. Most are artwork or historical]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>More at Volokh</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110301/02345813309/guy-passing-out-pamphlets-front-court-indicted-jury-tampering.shtml#c1102</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Mar 2011 14:37:38 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110301/02345813309/guy-passing-out-pamphlets-front-court-indicted-jury-tampering.shtml#c1102</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's a lengthy discussion over at the law blog<br />
<br />
<a href='http://volokh.com/2011/02/25/suppression-of-jury-nullification-advocates-speech-outside-courthouse/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://volokh.com/2011/02/25/suppression-of-jury-nullification-advocates-speech-outside-courthouse/</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101206/10223012145/netflixs-move-dvds-to-streaming-shows-massive-value-first-sale-doctrine.shtml#c122</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:58:11 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101206/10223012145/netflixs-move-dvds-to-streaming-shows-massive-value-first-sale-doctrine.shtml#c122</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The argument (perhaps from the studios) that it would not be fair for Netflix to buy just one dvd of a movie and then stream it tens of thousands of times, does make some sense.<br />
<br />
But a reasonable solution could be that if they buy (license) say, 10,000 copies at the dvd price, then they can stream up to 10,000 simultaneous showings of a movie.<br />
<br />
It wouldn't be too much of a hardship for viewers to understand that all the available films are being watched at some particular time and Netflix could manage their purchased to meet demand just like they do now with physical dvds.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101203/09510612115/ubisofts-new-drm-vuvuzelas.shtml#c465</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:05:36 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101203/09510612115/ubisofts-new-drm-vuvuzelas.shtml#c465</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So who has the copyright on the vuvu sounds. Surely they are creative, with beat and rhythm?<br />
<br />
Did Ubisoft get licenses from the copyright holders, the vuvu players,  or did they just take the recordings and use them?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Owning color in a specific trademark</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/23213212175/breast-cancer-charity-bullying-other-charities-over-trademark.shtml#c292</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:22:33 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/23213212175/breast-cancer-charity-bullying-other-charities-over-trademark.shtml#c292</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://tess2.uspto.gov/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://tess2.uspto.gov/</a><br />
<br />
Search Term: Susan G Komen<br />
Field: Owner Name and Address<br />
Result Must Contain: All Search Terms<br />
<br />
295 results don't seem to include the color. but lots of phrases.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Trademark license for different product??</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/23213212175/breast-cancer-charity-bullying-other-charities-over-trademark.shtml#c273</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:16:37 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/23213212175/breast-cancer-charity-bullying-other-charities-over-trademark.shtml#c273</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not always. Trademarks are there to avoid confusion for the consumer.<br />
<br />
I am a photographer. If I set up a website called "Red Cross Health Photographs" with a large red cross logo, I would expect customers to be confused and the real Red Cross to have an excellent case against me.<br />
<br />
That said, there is no doubt a trademark owner can be overly agressive is asserting broad rights where there may be little or no real customer confusion.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trademark license for different product??</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/23213212175/breast-cancer-charity-bullying-other-charities-over-trademark.shtml#c186</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 Dec 2010 10:25:59 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101207/23213212175/breast-cancer-charity-bullying-other-charities-over-trademark.shtml#c186</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mike. your suggestion to "license" the trademark to other entities doesn't make sense. It would likely be considered "naked licensing" and they could lose their trademarks:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://definitions.uslegal.com/n/naked-license/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://definitions.uslegal.com/n/naked-license/</a><br />
<br />
"licensing is generally permitted provided that the mark]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101206/11325112148/us-copyright-czar-expect-more-domain-censorship.shtml#c44</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:08:38 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101206/11325112148/us-copyright-czar-expect-more-domain-censorship.shtml#c44</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@Josh plus monitoring Facebook and Flickr for infringements. <br />
<br />
Except for one tiny problem. Aside from fair use, a copyrighted photo online may actually be licensed and there is no way to tell the license terms.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Links</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101122/12544311971/why-murdochs-ipad-only-newspaper-misses-point.shtml#c53</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Sanger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 21:57:35 PST</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101122/12544311971/why-murdochs-ipad-only-newspaper-misses-point.shtml#c53</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well one problem certainly is:<br />
<br />
no print edition + no web edition = no history + no links<br />
<br />
Rather than support creativity, this product makes the creative works disposable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>