<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by crade</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c964</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:36:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c964</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gamers to Gears of War designer:<br />
Let us know how that works out for you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130615/01513723485/copyright-troll-lawsuit-ends-badly-because-very-dumb-defendant-lied-to-court-destroyed-evidence.shtml#c63</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:51:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130615/01513723485/copyright-troll-lawsuit-ends-badly-because-very-dumb-defendant-lied-to-court-destroyed-evidence.shtml#c63</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Really? You are going to delete all my replies to your post that completely proved Mike is right and you were lying??  Why have you done that?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130615/01513723485/copyright-troll-lawsuit-ends-badly-because-very-dumb-defendant-lied-to-court-destroyed-evidence.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:49:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130615/01513723485/copyright-troll-lawsuit-ends-badly-because-very-dumb-defendant-lied-to-court-destroyed-evidence.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bad law comes from bad legistlators and bad judgement.  <br />
Bad cases are a given.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/02053123505/dick-cheneys-crystal-ball-says-that-nsa-surveillance-could-have-stopped-911.shtml#c13</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:39:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/02053123505/dick-cheneys-crystal-ball-says-that-nsa-surveillance-could-have-stopped-911.shtml#c13</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're assuming that he means the gov't may have used the info to stop 9/11..  Perhaps he means the terrorists wouldn't have bothered trying if everyone was already terrorized to that point.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/04161223468/first-french-file-sharer-sentenced-to-disconnection-under-hadopi-judgment-may-be-unenforceable.shtml#c257</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:27:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/04161223468/first-french-file-sharer-sentenced-to-disconnection-under-hadopi-judgment-may-be-unenforceable.shtml#c257</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My thoughts are imho even your article says Hadopi is dead/dying..<br />
<br />
The only thing that made Hadopi different/controversial is the threat of suspending internet, which your article says is going away.  That was the stick.. What else is left?  Three strikes and then more strikes?  The core of Hadopi was the suspension, not the strikes.<br />
<br />
It also says that the Hadopi agency is being disbanded and they are going to dump whats left of it on some existing agency to do in their spare time..  Not exactly what I would call thriving.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/04161223468/first-french-file-sharer-sentenced-to-disconnection-under-hadopi-judgment-may-be-unenforceable.shtml#c168</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:59:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/04161223468/first-french-file-sharer-sentenced-to-disconnection-under-hadopi-judgment-may-be-unenforceable.shtml#c168</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["was fined but innocent"<br />
Not true, he was guilty.  You just don't actually need to infringe on any copyrights or do anything wrong to be guilty.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/04315023339/pianist-storms-off-stage-claims-fans-filming-his-performance-mean-record-labels-wont-give-him-contract.shtml#c413</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 14:11:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/04315023339/pianist-storms-off-stage-claims-fans-filming-his-performance-mean-record-labels-wont-give-him-contract.shtml#c413</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["because music managers had told him: "We're sorry, that has already been on YouTube." "<br />
<br />
I think you misunderstood and they mean your music is nothing special because *other* people have posted a bunch of their own *very similar* to youtube...<br />
<br />
Either that or someone should tell Justin Beiber that his youtube videos will wreck his career.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/13431923427/dear-politicians-exposing-us-dirty-laundry-isnt-aiding-enemy.shtml#c428</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:48:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/13431923427/dear-politicians-exposing-us-dirty-laundry-isnt-aiding-enemy.shtml#c428</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Indeed, it's obviously the civies fault for getting in the way of IRA gunfire.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Oooh, softball! -- Hear Mike ranting about Google's surveillance?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/18283123436/hear-that-deafening-silence-att-verizon-about-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c27</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:30:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/18283123436/hear-that-deafening-silence-att-verizon-about-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c27</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I sincerely hope for his/her sake that he/she is getting paid for it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Oooh, softball! -- Hear Mike ranting about Google's surveillance?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/18283123436/hear-that-deafening-silence-att-verizon-about-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:29:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/18283123436/hear-that-deafening-silence-att-verizon-about-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That would be the part about "Tech Companies loadly denying handing over data" in contrast to the telcos in the article.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130605/08093123325/president-obamas-patent-plan-may-have-more-teeth-than-you-realize.shtml#c222</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:14:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130605/08093123325/president-obamas-patent-plan-may-have-more-teeth-than-you-realize.shtml#c222</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The problems with software patents are certainly not exclusive to software patents.  They just look worse because of the volume of activity in that area.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: It's a cheap shot, but I can't resist</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/03400323403/sony-e3-look-how-unlike-microsoft-we-are.shtml#c537</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:35:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/03400323403/sony-e3-look-how-unlike-microsoft-we-are.shtml#c537</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I can see people still playing them if they have them..  What I don't understand is how people still buy them.  I still have NHL 2k4 or something for PS2, and it's not a bad game at all, but I don't need to buy a roster update for it for 60$ every year..  I mean, who cares what names are skating around?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/03400323403/sony-e3-look-how-unlike-microsoft-we-are.shtml#c490</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:24:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/03400323403/sony-e3-look-how-unlike-microsoft-we-are.shtml#c490</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Of course, knowing Sony, they will probably change their mind a year or so after everyone buys one and roll out a forced update to lockdown used game sales anyway.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/03400323403/sony-e3-look-how-unlike-microsoft-we-are.shtml#c475</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:22:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/03400323403/sony-e3-look-how-unlike-microsoft-we-are.shtml#c475</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["It might seem a better thing for Sony to simply say they won't allow the kind of used game pocket-picking that MIcrosoft is codifying"<br />
<br />
To me, this does not seem like a better thing.  Certainly it's a better thing for Sony not to provide the ability for or encourage shutting down used games, but imho they should not be saying "if your game has DRM that restricts used game sales, it's not welcome on the PS3" either.  The less controlling they are of the content that runs on their platform, the better I think.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Mental Gymnastics</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/09473723393/clapper-my-answer-to-wydens-beating-your-wife-question-data-surveillance-was-least-untruthful-answer.shtml#c408</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:43:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130610/09473723393/clapper-my-answer-to-wydens-beating-your-wife-question-data-surveillance-was-least-untruthful-answer.shtml#c408</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If thats how he parsed the question, he didn't pick one of the answers anyway, so it would be akin to being asked "have you stopped beating your wife", answering with "I never started", then when you are proven to be lying, saying it was the least untruthful answer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Idiot</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130607/09500123363/president-obama-welcomes-debate-surveillance-that-hes-avoided-years-until-it-was-forced-upon-him.shtml#c207</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:06:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130607/09500123363/president-obama-welcomes-debate-surveillance-that-hes-avoided-years-until-it-was-forced-upon-him.shtml#c207</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[talk is cheap.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Will Mike welcome The Debate On GOOGLE'S Surveillance?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130607/09500123363/president-obama-welcomes-debate-surveillance-that-hes-avoided-years-until-it-was-forced-upon-him.shtml#c186</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:05:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130607/09500123363/president-obama-welcomes-debate-surveillance-that-hes-avoided-years-until-it-was-forced-upon-him.shtml#c186</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't think Mike gets to decide any policies on google's surveillance, but you can "debate" at him until you are blue (now I get it!) to no result if you like.<br />
<br />
You could debate with google all you like too until you finally figure out that they don't decide the rules either, but just play by them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Politician ignores tough issue until forced to acknowledge it</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130607/09500123363/president-obama-welcomes-debate-surveillance-that-hes-avoided-years-until-it-was-forced-upon-him.shtml#c100</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:56:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130607/09500123363/president-obama-welcomes-debate-surveillance-that-hes-avoided-years-until-it-was-forced-upon-him.shtml#c100</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They are in jail.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Idiot</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130607/09500123363/president-obama-welcomes-debate-surveillance-that-hes-avoided-years-until-it-was-forced-upon-him.shtml#c86</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:55:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130607/09500123363/president-obama-welcomes-debate-surveillance-that-hes-avoided-years-until-it-was-forced-upon-him.shtml#c86</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The answer to which should always be:<br />
Yes, so what are you going to do about it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Um funny...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130603/02240523294/dan-brown-video-games-lead-to-violence.shtml#c957</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 6 Jun 2013 12:05:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130603/02240523294/dan-brown-video-games-lead-to-violence.shtml#c957</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Reading may take time, but not as much time as WOW.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>