<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by Chronno S. Trigger</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c212</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:53:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c212</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Does anyone know of anywhere on their site that says that?  I've been keeping a list of gaming companies that allow monetization of gaming videos, but I want to have a page I can point at.  The surprising one on the list is Blizzard Interactive.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: I don't need your consent .....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c1721</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:47:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c1721</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["No respectable ad agency will buy photos for ads without waivers."<br />
<br />
That's a CYA kind of thing.  Lawsuits are a bitch, even frivolous lawsuits.  I've been in commercials without signing a waver.  In fact, I was recorded without my knowledge and didn't even know about the commercial until it aired.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/17254423102/eric-holder-claims-terrorists-are-involved-ip-theft.shtml#c869</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:05:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/17254423102/eric-holder-claims-terrorists-are-involved-ip-theft.shtml#c869</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Speaking from the point of view of justice (something you may or may not be failure with), it's not AC's job to prove that you're innocent.  It's not my job, nor is it your job.  We, all of us, are not responsible to prove that you're innocent.<br />
<br />
You want to know who is responsible to prove anything?  The Attorney General.  It's his responsibility to prove that you did do something.  And it's his responsibility to prove that terrorists are somehow using something that everyone knows how to get for free to fund their actions.<br />
<br />
This isn't about terrorism.  This, and most things on this blog, is about justice.  And justice isn't just about punishing the guilty, it's about protecting the innocent.  The innocent are far, far more important then the guilty.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/15163123086/did-paul-duffys-wife-admit-that-duffy-was-engaged-interstate-extortion-facebook.shtml#c432</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 09:16:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/15163123086/did-paul-duffys-wife-admit-that-duffy-was-engaged-interstate-extortion-facebook.shtml#c432</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["And I agree with her assessment, BTW."<br />
<br />
I agree as well.  Pornography is legalized prostitution.  The only difference between me and her is I don't think prostitution should be illegal in the first place.  Granted, I am assuming that Julie thinks both porn and prostitution should be illegal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Unions R not needed -- NO, clearly ARE!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/16102022953/canadian-airline-files-4-million-libel-suit-against-22-striking-fuel-workers-over-twitter-account-with-200-followers.shtml#c258</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 20:16:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/16102022953/canadian-airline-files-4-million-libel-suit-against-22-striking-fuel-workers-over-twitter-account-with-200-followers.shtml#c258</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree that unions were useful.  As you said, they got us the 40 hour work week, overtime pay, sick leave, and the like.  They also got us one more thing that you and quite a few others seem to overlook; labor laws.  The 40 hour work week is a law, overtime compensation (not necessarily pay) is a law.<br />
<br />
Today unions seem to be all about taking massive amounts of money from those they supposedly protect (e.g. insanely high union dues) and screwing over anyone and everyone they can (e.g. the Hostess thing).<br />
<br />
There may be legitimate unions, they may even have a place in modern society; but every time I've read about unions or dealt with them, they or on the morally wrong side of the argument.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: No unusual</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/17221923011/streetlight-manifesto-cant-fulfill-pre-orders-because-label-refuses-to-give-them-their-own-records.shtml#c668</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:03:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/17221923011/streetlight-manifesto-cant-fulfill-pre-orders-because-label-refuses-to-give-them-their-own-records.shtml#c668</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[" Funny how you ignore the thing that apparently started the whole mess (Victory not paying its artists, among other misdeeds), and go straight to blaming the band's attempt to bring the label's practices to light"<br />
<br />
Horse With No Name is just following the Star Trek rules of temporal mechanics.  Sometimes effect can precede cause.<br />
<br />
Victory didn't pay Streetlight because Streetlight was going to call Victory out over them not paying what was owed.  You see?<br />
<br />
Yeah, that episode of Voyager didn't make any damn sense to me ether.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Damn you Pavlov</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/16130622982/this-is-my-pencil-this-is-my-gun-one-is-writing-one-is-mandatory-two-day-suspensions.shtml#c635</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 May 2013 11:01:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/16130622982/this-is-my-pencil-this-is-my-gun-one-is-writing-one-is-mandatory-two-day-suspensions.shtml#c635</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Some children would consider it threatening, who are scared about shootings in schools or shootings in the community,"<br />
<br />
I learned something a while ago about phobias.  I have a phobia of bugs, anything with more then four legs freaks me out.  I was able to ignore it until I accepted the fact that I had a phobia.  Now I can't go anywhere near the damn things.  Accepting that I had the fear and using it as an excuse to not do things nurtured the fear and turned it into something much worse.<br />
<br />
The same can be seen when dealing with pets that fear loud noises.  If your dog gets freaked out by thunder and you coddle it, the dog thinks that thunder is truly a thing to be feared (and the barking at the thunder gets worse).  But if you ignore the thunder and treat the dog like normal, the dog learns not to fear the thunder.<br />
<br />
If we over react to children playing with pencils, we teach all children around that anything can be a threat.  This is something they will take into adulthood and affect their lives, their jobs, and their families.  <br />
<br />
This isn't just putting something on these two boy's records, this is teaching everyone in that school that even the smallest thing should be treated with zero understanding, zero forgiveness, and maximum reaction.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: What I really want...I have watched a pedestrian try to walk in front of a 40 ton lorry whilst talking to their wife. However in ju,ping back they tossed the phone into the traffic, and by the time it stopped pin balling between vehicles i</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130503/12261122940/moral-panic-over-google-glass-white-house-petition-asks-to-ban-them-to-prevent-indecent-public-surveillance.shtml#c860</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 6 May 2013 14:27:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130503/12261122940/moral-panic-over-google-glass-white-house-petition-asks-to-ban-them-to-prevent-indecent-public-surveillance.shtml#c860</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As you point out, this is already a risk.  Why ban something because it can be used like this.  Why not just bitch slap them with current reckless driving laws.<br />
<br />
You ban the technology just because it can be abused, you remove the possibility of using it to become a safer driver.  A HUD would help people be safer drivers as they wouldn't have to take their eyes off the road as often.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130428/18232822866/ny-police-chief-ray-kelly-says-boston-bombing-takes-privacy-off-table.shtml#c596</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 2 May 2013 12:49:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130428/18232822866/ny-police-chief-ray-kelly-says-boston-bombing-takes-privacy-off-table.shtml#c596</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["he proudly states that the city has not been attacked by terrorists since the 9/11 tragedy"<br />
<br />
And I have a rock here that keeps away tigers.  Don't believe me?  Do you see any tigers around?  Now what are my offers?  $10 from the large balding man in the white shirt.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/10070222836/mcafee-patents-system-to-detect-prevent-illegal-consumption-content-internet.shtml#c329</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 17:09:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/10070222836/mcafee-patents-system-to-detect-prevent-illegal-consumption-content-internet.shtml#c329</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's a system that detects what address you type into the address bar and give you a warning if that address is associated with a "bad" site?<br />
<br />
Prior Art: Firefox/Chrome.  If you type in an address to a website that has been reported to have malware, it will warn you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130419/15503622772/washington-state-allows-third-parties-to-brand-youthful-offenders-life-low-low-price-only-69-record.shtml#c454</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:40:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130419/15503622772/washington-state-allows-third-parties-to-brand-youthful-offenders-life-low-low-price-only-69-record.shtml#c454</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["and learn what it means to live in society."<br />
<br />
Punishment for eternity over something done during the years that one is scientifically proven to be an idiot?  That's not society, that's barbaric.<br />
<br />
You also have no problems over the public sale of a minor's record without the consent of the guardian or minor?  You are a barbarian.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130417/10475822745/japan-latest-country-to-mistakenly-say-google-is-responsible-autocomplete-results.shtml#c185</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:35:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130417/10475822745/japan-latest-country-to-mistakenly-say-google-is-responsible-autocomplete-results.shtml#c185</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, considering how the algorithm works, there are two possible parties responsible.<br />
<br />
1) The many people who search for that particular combination of words<br />
<br />
2) The person who allegedly really slandered the guy<br />
<br />
Take your pick.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Yet again, The Rich are the problem.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130422/21100822804/nyc-mayor-bloomberg-thinks-boston-bombing-renders-constitution-obsolete.shtml#c1335</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:48:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130422/21100822804/nyc-mayor-bloomberg-thinks-boston-bombing-renders-constitution-obsolete.shtml#c1335</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["if a couple 'nice' ones got tossed in by mistake, well, they don't lose too much sleep over us 99% getting fucked over, i won't lost too much over a couple rich pukes being sacrificed for the good of 99%.."<br />
<br />
It's this kind of thinking that causes the crap you rally against.  Being so willing to sacrifice the innocent to get back at the guilty.  We must stop terrorists so we put up with sexual harassment at the airports.  We want to stop overeating so we must ban all large soda.  We have been slighted by the rich so kill them all.  <br />
<br />
Isn't it this kind of thinking that caused the Dark Ages, the Spanish Inquisition, the Salem Witch Trials, and the Holocaust?  Someone must be punished and to hell with the collateral damage.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Keepin' it classy, minion.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130421/20110722794/red-sox-david-ortiz-unleashes-expletive-during-televised-speech-fcc-says-fk-it.shtml#c451</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:51:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130421/20110722794/red-sox-david-ortiz-unleashes-expletive-during-televised-speech-fcc-says-fk-it.shtml#c451</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Blue didn't use one single "bad" word in his entire post, yet the quote "This is our fucking city, and nobody's going to dictate our freedom." holds infinity more maturity.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What the fuck happened to TechDirt?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130421/20110722794/red-sox-david-ortiz-unleashes-expletive-during-televised-speech-fcc-says-fk-it.shtml#c445</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:49:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130421/20110722794/red-sox-david-ortiz-unleashes-expletive-during-televised-speech-fcc-says-fk-it.shtml#c445</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why should anyone look up scientific research or get expert opinions on the subject?  The Supreme Court says that fining cable channels for fleeting expletives is a violation of the First Amendment.  End of story.  No need to give the other side equal time.  They're wrong and they need to be told in no uncertain terms.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130422/08054722799/google-fined-wi-fi-privacy-violations-grandstanding-german-regulators-not-satisfied.shtml#c466</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:26:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130422/08054722799/google-fined-wi-fi-privacy-violations-grandstanding-german-regulators-not-satisfied.shtml#c466</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They do make them.  I know DD-WRT routers (just google it and you'll find the page) can do it, but it's complicated.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Because GOT CAUGHT EARLY and stopped!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130422/08054722799/google-fined-wi-fi-privacy-violations-grandstanding-german-regulators-not-satisfied.shtml#c212</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:51:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130422/08054722799/google-fined-wi-fi-privacy-violations-grandstanding-german-regulators-not-satisfied.shtml#c212</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Blue, you are a raving lunatic.  I think that's all that needs to be said.  Everyone else can easily see the problems in your arguments, and since you're willfully blind to your own flaws, there's no point in me arguing them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130422/08054722799/google-fined-wi-fi-privacy-violations-grandstanding-german-regulators-not-satisfied.shtml#c108</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 11:24:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130422/08054722799/google-fined-wi-fi-privacy-violations-grandstanding-german-regulators-not-satisfied.shtml#c108</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There are plenty of legitimate reasons to leave WiFi open.  Sharing the connection with friends without having to worry about remembering the key.  Older technology compatibility (don't know if it's just me, but my new access point won't let me use WEP and my old tech won't use WPA).  There's also the fact that WEP and WPA can be cracked easily and it's probably better to focus on internal security.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Like a moth to the flame...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130408/08031822622/when-is-image-manipulated-enough-to-become-original-creation.shtml#c678</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:05:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130408/08031822622/when-is-image-manipulated-enough-to-become-original-creation.shtml#c678</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["There are a lot of pictures of this species around the web, are they sure its the same individual in both pictures?"<br />
<br />
If it's not the same picture, it's the same moth.  But that begs the question, what if it is a different picture, but is the same moth?  Does the copyright claim still exist?<br />
<br />
If I take a picture of a building that looks almost identical to another picture of the same building, is it infringement?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Your headline is an outright lie he said no such thing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130416/11521022726/rep-steve-king-because-boston-bombing-may-have-been-done-immigrant-we-should-block-immigration-reform.shtml#c432</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 13:38:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130416/11521022726/rep-steve-king-because-boston-bombing-may-have-been-done-immigrant-we-should-block-immigration-reform.shtml#c432</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh look, the return of Angry Dude.  Or have you been back and I just missed it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>